Cargando…

Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis

PURPOSE: Long-acting formulations of the potent antiretroviral prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hold potential as biomedical HIV prevention modalities. Here, we present a rigorous comparison of three animal models, C57BL/6 J mice, beagle dogs, and merino sheep for evaluating TAF implant pharmacok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunawardana, Manjula, Remedios-Chan, Mariana, Sanchez, Debbie, Fanter, Rob, Webster, Simon, Webster, Paul, Moss, John A., Trinh, MyMy, Beliveau, Martin, Ramirez, Christina M., Marzinke, Mark A., Kuo, Joseph, Gallay, Philippe A., Baum, Marc M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03440-6
_version_ 1785089047569367040
author Gunawardana, Manjula
Remedios-Chan, Mariana
Sanchez, Debbie
Fanter, Rob
Webster, Simon
Webster, Paul
Moss, John A.
Trinh, MyMy
Beliveau, Martin
Ramirez, Christina M.
Marzinke, Mark A.
Kuo, Joseph
Gallay, Philippe A.
Baum, Marc M.
author_facet Gunawardana, Manjula
Remedios-Chan, Mariana
Sanchez, Debbie
Fanter, Rob
Webster, Simon
Webster, Paul
Moss, John A.
Trinh, MyMy
Beliveau, Martin
Ramirez, Christina M.
Marzinke, Mark A.
Kuo, Joseph
Gallay, Philippe A.
Baum, Marc M.
author_sort Gunawardana, Manjula
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Long-acting formulations of the potent antiretroviral prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hold potential as biomedical HIV prevention modalities. Here, we present a rigorous comparison of three animal models, C57BL/6 J mice, beagle dogs, and merino sheep for evaluating TAF implant pharmacokinetics (PKs). METHODS: Implants delivering TAF over a wide range of controlled release rates were tested in vitro and in mice and dogs. Our existing PK model, supported by an intravenous (IV) dosing dog study, was adapted to analyze mechanistic aspects underlying implant TAF delivery. RESULTS: TAF in vitro release in the 0.13 to 9.8 mg d(−1) range with zero order kinetics were attained. Implants with equivalent fabrication parameters released TAF in mice and sheep at rates that were not statistically different, but were 3 times higher in dogs. When two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket, a two-week creep to C(max) was observed in dogs for systemic drug and metabolite concentrations, but not in mice. Co-modeling IV and TAF implant PK data in dogs led to an apparent TAF bioavailability of 9.6 in the single implant groups (compared to the IV group), but only 1.5 when two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current results, we recommend using mice and sheep, with macaques as a complementary species, for preclinical TAF implant evaluation with the caveat that our observations may be specific to the implant technology used here. Our report provides fundamental, translatable insights into multispecies TAF delivery via long-acting implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10421770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104217702023-08-13 Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Gunawardana, Manjula Remedios-Chan, Mariana Sanchez, Debbie Fanter, Rob Webster, Simon Webster, Paul Moss, John A. Trinh, MyMy Beliveau, Martin Ramirez, Christina M. Marzinke, Mark A. Kuo, Joseph Gallay, Philippe A. Baum, Marc M. Pharm Res Original Research Article PURPOSE: Long-acting formulations of the potent antiretroviral prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hold potential as biomedical HIV prevention modalities. Here, we present a rigorous comparison of three animal models, C57BL/6 J mice, beagle dogs, and merino sheep for evaluating TAF implant pharmacokinetics (PKs). METHODS: Implants delivering TAF over a wide range of controlled release rates were tested in vitro and in mice and dogs. Our existing PK model, supported by an intravenous (IV) dosing dog study, was adapted to analyze mechanistic aspects underlying implant TAF delivery. RESULTS: TAF in vitro release in the 0.13 to 9.8 mg d(−1) range with zero order kinetics were attained. Implants with equivalent fabrication parameters released TAF in mice and sheep at rates that were not statistically different, but were 3 times higher in dogs. When two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket, a two-week creep to C(max) was observed in dogs for systemic drug and metabolite concentrations, but not in mice. Co-modeling IV and TAF implant PK data in dogs led to an apparent TAF bioavailability of 9.6 in the single implant groups (compared to the IV group), but only 1.5 when two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current results, we recommend using mice and sheep, with macaques as a complementary species, for preclinical TAF implant evaluation with the caveat that our observations may be specific to the implant technology used here. Our report provides fundamental, translatable insights into multispecies TAF delivery via long-acting implants. Springer US 2022-11-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10421770/ /pubmed/36418671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03440-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Gunawardana, Manjula
Remedios-Chan, Mariana
Sanchez, Debbie
Fanter, Rob
Webster, Simon
Webster, Paul
Moss, John A.
Trinh, MyMy
Beliveau, Martin
Ramirez, Christina M.
Marzinke, Mark A.
Kuo, Joseph
Gallay, Philippe A.
Baum, Marc M.
Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
title Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
title_full Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
title_fullStr Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
title_short Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
title_sort preclinical considerations for long-acting delivery of tenofovir alafenamide from subdermal implants for hiv pre-exposure prophylaxis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03440-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gunawardanamanjula preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT remedioschanmariana preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT sanchezdebbie preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT fanterrob preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT webstersimon preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT websterpaul preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT mossjohna preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT trinhmymy preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT beliveaumartin preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT ramirezchristinam preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT marzinkemarka preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT kuojoseph preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT gallayphilippea preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis
AT baummarcm preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis