Cargando…
Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
PURPOSE: Long-acting formulations of the potent antiretroviral prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hold potential as biomedical HIV prevention modalities. Here, we present a rigorous comparison of three animal models, C57BL/6 J mice, beagle dogs, and merino sheep for evaluating TAF implant pharmacok...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03440-6 |
_version_ | 1785089047569367040 |
---|---|
author | Gunawardana, Manjula Remedios-Chan, Mariana Sanchez, Debbie Fanter, Rob Webster, Simon Webster, Paul Moss, John A. Trinh, MyMy Beliveau, Martin Ramirez, Christina M. Marzinke, Mark A. Kuo, Joseph Gallay, Philippe A. Baum, Marc M. |
author_facet | Gunawardana, Manjula Remedios-Chan, Mariana Sanchez, Debbie Fanter, Rob Webster, Simon Webster, Paul Moss, John A. Trinh, MyMy Beliveau, Martin Ramirez, Christina M. Marzinke, Mark A. Kuo, Joseph Gallay, Philippe A. Baum, Marc M. |
author_sort | Gunawardana, Manjula |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Long-acting formulations of the potent antiretroviral prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hold potential as biomedical HIV prevention modalities. Here, we present a rigorous comparison of three animal models, C57BL/6 J mice, beagle dogs, and merino sheep for evaluating TAF implant pharmacokinetics (PKs). METHODS: Implants delivering TAF over a wide range of controlled release rates were tested in vitro and in mice and dogs. Our existing PK model, supported by an intravenous (IV) dosing dog study, was adapted to analyze mechanistic aspects underlying implant TAF delivery. RESULTS: TAF in vitro release in the 0.13 to 9.8 mg d(−1) range with zero order kinetics were attained. Implants with equivalent fabrication parameters released TAF in mice and sheep at rates that were not statistically different, but were 3 times higher in dogs. When two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket, a two-week creep to C(max) was observed in dogs for systemic drug and metabolite concentrations, but not in mice. Co-modeling IV and TAF implant PK data in dogs led to an apparent TAF bioavailability of 9.6 in the single implant groups (compared to the IV group), but only 1.5 when two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current results, we recommend using mice and sheep, with macaques as a complementary species, for preclinical TAF implant evaluation with the caveat that our observations may be specific to the implant technology used here. Our report provides fundamental, translatable insights into multispecies TAF delivery via long-acting implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10421770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104217702023-08-13 Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Gunawardana, Manjula Remedios-Chan, Mariana Sanchez, Debbie Fanter, Rob Webster, Simon Webster, Paul Moss, John A. Trinh, MyMy Beliveau, Martin Ramirez, Christina M. Marzinke, Mark A. Kuo, Joseph Gallay, Philippe A. Baum, Marc M. Pharm Res Original Research Article PURPOSE: Long-acting formulations of the potent antiretroviral prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) hold potential as biomedical HIV prevention modalities. Here, we present a rigorous comparison of three animal models, C57BL/6 J mice, beagle dogs, and merino sheep for evaluating TAF implant pharmacokinetics (PKs). METHODS: Implants delivering TAF over a wide range of controlled release rates were tested in vitro and in mice and dogs. Our existing PK model, supported by an intravenous (IV) dosing dog study, was adapted to analyze mechanistic aspects underlying implant TAF delivery. RESULTS: TAF in vitro release in the 0.13 to 9.8 mg d(−1) range with zero order kinetics were attained. Implants with equivalent fabrication parameters released TAF in mice and sheep at rates that were not statistically different, but were 3 times higher in dogs. When two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket, a two-week creep to C(max) was observed in dogs for systemic drug and metabolite concentrations, but not in mice. Co-modeling IV and TAF implant PK data in dogs led to an apparent TAF bioavailability of 9.6 in the single implant groups (compared to the IV group), but only 1.5 when two implants were placed in the same subcutaneous pocket. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current results, we recommend using mice and sheep, with macaques as a complementary species, for preclinical TAF implant evaluation with the caveat that our observations may be specific to the implant technology used here. Our report provides fundamental, translatable insights into multispecies TAF delivery via long-acting implants. Springer US 2022-11-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10421770/ /pubmed/36418671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03440-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Gunawardana, Manjula Remedios-Chan, Mariana Sanchez, Debbie Fanter, Rob Webster, Simon Webster, Paul Moss, John A. Trinh, MyMy Beliveau, Martin Ramirez, Christina M. Marzinke, Mark A. Kuo, Joseph Gallay, Philippe A. Baum, Marc M. Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis |
title | Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis |
title_full | Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis |
title_short | Preclinical Considerations for Long-acting Delivery of Tenofovir Alafenamide from Subdermal Implants for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis |
title_sort | preclinical considerations for long-acting delivery of tenofovir alafenamide from subdermal implants for hiv pre-exposure prophylaxis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03440-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunawardanamanjula preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT remedioschanmariana preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT sanchezdebbie preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT fanterrob preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT webstersimon preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT websterpaul preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT mossjohna preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT trinhmymy preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT beliveaumartin preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT ramirezchristinam preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT marzinkemarka preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT kuojoseph preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT gallayphilippea preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis AT baummarcm preclinicalconsiderationsforlongactingdeliveryoftenofoviralafenamidefromsubdermalimplantsforhivpreexposureprophylaxis |