Cargando…

Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics

Adaptive therapies that alternate between drug applications and drug-free vacations can exploit competition between sensitive and resistant cells to maximize the time to progression. However, optimal dosing schedules depend on the properties of metastases, which are often not directly measurable in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallaher, Jill, Strobl, Maximilian, West, Jeffrey, Gatenby, Robert, Zhang, Jingsong, Robertson-Tessi, Mark, Anderson, Alexander R.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2558
_version_ 1785089903311192064
author Gallaher, Jill
Strobl, Maximilian
West, Jeffrey
Gatenby, Robert
Zhang, Jingsong
Robertson-Tessi, Mark
Anderson, Alexander R.A.
author_facet Gallaher, Jill
Strobl, Maximilian
West, Jeffrey
Gatenby, Robert
Zhang, Jingsong
Robertson-Tessi, Mark
Anderson, Alexander R.A.
author_sort Gallaher, Jill
collection PubMed
description Adaptive therapies that alternate between drug applications and drug-free vacations can exploit competition between sensitive and resistant cells to maximize the time to progression. However, optimal dosing schedules depend on the properties of metastases, which are often not directly measurable in clinical practice. Here, we proposed a framework for estimating features of metastases through tumor response dynamics during the first adaptive therapy treatment cycle. Longitudinal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in 16 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing adaptive androgen deprivation treatment were analyzed to investigate relationships between cycle dynamics and clinical variables such as Gleason score, the change in the number of metastases over a cycle, and the total number of cycles over the course of treatment. The first cycle of adaptive therapy, which consists of a response period (applying therapy until 50% PSA reduction), and a regrowth period (removing treatment until reaching initial PSA levels), delineated several features of the computational metastatic system: larger metastases had longer cycles; a higher proportion of drug-resistant cells slowed the cycles; and a faster cell turnover rate sped up drug response time and slowed regrowth time. The number of metastases did not affect cycle times, as response dynamics were dominated by the largest tumors rather than the aggregate. In addition, systems with higher intermetastasis heterogeneity responded better to continuous therapy and correlated with dynamics from patients with high or low Gleason scores. Conversely, systems with higher intrametastasis heterogeneity responded better to adaptive therapy and correlated with dynamics from patients with intermediate Gleason scores. SIGNIFICANCE: Multiscale mathematical modeling combined with biomarker dynamics during adaptive therapy helps identify underlying features of metastatic cancer to inform treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10425736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104257362023-08-16 Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics Gallaher, Jill Strobl, Maximilian West, Jeffrey Gatenby, Robert Zhang, Jingsong Robertson-Tessi, Mark Anderson, Alexander R.A. Cancer Res Computational Cancer Biology and Technology Adaptive therapies that alternate between drug applications and drug-free vacations can exploit competition between sensitive and resistant cells to maximize the time to progression. However, optimal dosing schedules depend on the properties of metastases, which are often not directly measurable in clinical practice. Here, we proposed a framework for estimating features of metastases through tumor response dynamics during the first adaptive therapy treatment cycle. Longitudinal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in 16 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing adaptive androgen deprivation treatment were analyzed to investigate relationships between cycle dynamics and clinical variables such as Gleason score, the change in the number of metastases over a cycle, and the total number of cycles over the course of treatment. The first cycle of adaptive therapy, which consists of a response period (applying therapy until 50% PSA reduction), and a regrowth period (removing treatment until reaching initial PSA levels), delineated several features of the computational metastatic system: larger metastases had longer cycles; a higher proportion of drug-resistant cells slowed the cycles; and a faster cell turnover rate sped up drug response time and slowed regrowth time. The number of metastases did not affect cycle times, as response dynamics were dominated by the largest tumors rather than the aggregate. In addition, systems with higher intermetastasis heterogeneity responded better to continuous therapy and correlated with dynamics from patients with high or low Gleason scores. Conversely, systems with higher intrametastasis heterogeneity responded better to adaptive therapy and correlated with dynamics from patients with intermediate Gleason scores. SIGNIFICANCE: Multiscale mathematical modeling combined with biomarker dynamics during adaptive therapy helps identify underlying features of metastatic cancer to inform treatment decisions. American Association for Cancer Research 2023-08-15 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10425736/ /pubmed/37205789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2558 Text en ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Computational Cancer Biology and Technology
Gallaher, Jill
Strobl, Maximilian
West, Jeffrey
Gatenby, Robert
Zhang, Jingsong
Robertson-Tessi, Mark
Anderson, Alexander R.A.
Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics
title Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics
title_full Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics
title_fullStr Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics
title_short Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics
title_sort intermetastatic and intrametastatic heterogeneity shapes adaptive therapy cycling dynamics
topic Computational Cancer Biology and Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2558
work_keys_str_mv AT gallaherjill intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics
AT stroblmaximilian intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics
AT westjeffrey intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics
AT gatenbyrobert intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics
AT zhangjingsong intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics
AT robertsontessimark intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics
AT andersonalexanderra intermetastaticandintrametastaticheterogeneityshapesadaptivetherapycyclingdynamics