Cargando…
Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of strength training with free-weight vs. machine equipment is heavily debated. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the data on the effect of free-weight versus machine-based strength training on maximal strength, jump height and hypertrophy. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4 |
_version_ | 1785090015072616448 |
---|---|
author | Haugen, Markus E. Vårvik, Fredrik T. Larsen, Stian Haugen, Arvid S. van den Tillaar, Roland Bjørnsen, Thomas |
author_facet | Haugen, Markus E. Vårvik, Fredrik T. Larsen, Stian Haugen, Arvid S. van den Tillaar, Roland Bjørnsen, Thomas |
author_sort | Haugen, Markus E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of strength training with free-weight vs. machine equipment is heavily debated. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the data on the effect of free-weight versus machine-based strength training on maximal strength, jump height and hypertrophy. METHODS: The review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the systematic search of literature was conducted up to January 1(st), 2023. Studies that directly compared free-weight vs. machine-based strength training for a minimum of 6 weeks in adults (18–60 yrs.) were included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (outcomes: maximal strength [n = 12], jump performance [n = 5], muscle hypertrophy [n = 5]) with a total sample of 1016 participants (789 men, 219 women) were included. Strength in free-weight tests increased significantly more with free-weight training than with machines (SMD: -0.210, CI: -0.391, -0.029, p = 0.023), while strength in machine-based tests tended to increase more with machine training than with free-weights (SMD: 0.291, CI: -0.017, 0.600, p = 0.064). However, no differences were found between modalities in direct comparison (free-weight strength vs. machine strength) for dynamic strength (SMD: 0.084, CI: -0.106, 0.273, p = 0.387), isometric strength (SMD: -0.079, CI: -0.432, 0.273, p = 0.660), countermovement jump (SMD: -0.209, CI: -0.597, 0.179, p = 0.290) and hypertrophy (SMD: -0.055, CI: -0.397, 0.287, p = 0.751). CONCLUSION: No differences were detected in the direct comparison of strength, jump performance and muscle hypertrophy. Current body of evidence indicates that strength changes are specific to the training modality, and the choice between free-weights and machines are down to individual preferences and goals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10426227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104262272023-08-16 Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis Haugen, Markus E. Vårvik, Fredrik T. Larsen, Stian Haugen, Arvid S. van den Tillaar, Roland Bjørnsen, Thomas BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of strength training with free-weight vs. machine equipment is heavily debated. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the data on the effect of free-weight versus machine-based strength training on maximal strength, jump height and hypertrophy. METHODS: The review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the systematic search of literature was conducted up to January 1(st), 2023. Studies that directly compared free-weight vs. machine-based strength training for a minimum of 6 weeks in adults (18–60 yrs.) were included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (outcomes: maximal strength [n = 12], jump performance [n = 5], muscle hypertrophy [n = 5]) with a total sample of 1016 participants (789 men, 219 women) were included. Strength in free-weight tests increased significantly more with free-weight training than with machines (SMD: -0.210, CI: -0.391, -0.029, p = 0.023), while strength in machine-based tests tended to increase more with machine training than with free-weights (SMD: 0.291, CI: -0.017, 0.600, p = 0.064). However, no differences were found between modalities in direct comparison (free-weight strength vs. machine strength) for dynamic strength (SMD: 0.084, CI: -0.106, 0.273, p = 0.387), isometric strength (SMD: -0.079, CI: -0.432, 0.273, p = 0.660), countermovement jump (SMD: -0.209, CI: -0.597, 0.179, p = 0.290) and hypertrophy (SMD: -0.055, CI: -0.397, 0.287, p = 0.751). CONCLUSION: No differences were detected in the direct comparison of strength, jump performance and muscle hypertrophy. Current body of evidence indicates that strength changes are specific to the training modality, and the choice between free-weights and machines are down to individual preferences and goals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4. BioMed Central 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10426227/ /pubmed/37582807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haugen, Markus E. Vårvik, Fredrik T. Larsen, Stian Haugen, Arvid S. van den Tillaar, Roland Bjørnsen, Thomas Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of free-weight vs. machine-based strength training on maximal strength, hypertrophy and jump performance – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00713-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haugenmarkuse effectoffreeweightvsmachinebasedstrengthtrainingonmaximalstrengthhypertrophyandjumpperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT varvikfredrikt effectoffreeweightvsmachinebasedstrengthtrainingonmaximalstrengthhypertrophyandjumpperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT larsenstian effectoffreeweightvsmachinebasedstrengthtrainingonmaximalstrengthhypertrophyandjumpperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haugenarvids effectoffreeweightvsmachinebasedstrengthtrainingonmaximalstrengthhypertrophyandjumpperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vandentillaarroland effectoffreeweightvsmachinebasedstrengthtrainingonmaximalstrengthhypertrophyandjumpperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bjørnsenthomas effectoffreeweightvsmachinebasedstrengthtrainingonmaximalstrengthhypertrophyandjumpperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |