Cargando…
Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, doctoral student education in the biomedical sciences relies on didactic coursework to build a foundation of scientific knowledge and an apprenticeship model of training in the laboratory of an established investigator. Recent recommendations for revision of graduate train...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7 |
_version_ | 1785090495939084288 |
---|---|
author | Schaller, Michael D. Gencheva, Marieta Gunther, Michael R. Weed, Scott A. |
author_facet | Schaller, Michael D. Gencheva, Marieta Gunther, Michael R. Weed, Scott A. |
author_sort | Schaller, Michael D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditionally, doctoral student education in the biomedical sciences relies on didactic coursework to build a foundation of scientific knowledge and an apprenticeship model of training in the laboratory of an established investigator. Recent recommendations for revision of graduate training include the utilization of graduate student competencies to assess progress and the introduction of novel curricula focused on development of skills, rather than accumulation of facts. Evidence demonstrates that active learning approaches are effective. Several facets of active learning are components of problem-based learning (PBL), which is a teaching modality where student learning is self-directed toward solving problems in a relevant context. These concepts were combined and incorporated in creating a new introductory graduate course designed to develop scientific skills (student competencies) in matriculating doctoral students using a PBL format. METHODS: Evaluation of course effectiveness was measured using the principals of the Kirkpatrick Four Level Model of Evaluation. At the end of each course offering, students completed evaluation surveys on the course and instructors to assess their perceptions of training effectiveness. Pre- and post-tests assessing students’ proficiency in experimental design were used to measure student learning. RESULTS: The analysis of the outcomes of the course suggests the training is effective in improving experimental design. The course was well received by the students as measured by student evaluations (Kirkpatrick Model Level 1). Improved scores on post-tests indicate that the students learned from the experience (Kirkpatrick Model Level 2). A template is provided for the implementation of similar courses at other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: This problem-based learning course appears effective in training newly matriculated graduate students in the required skills for designing experiments to test specific hypotheses, enhancing student preparation prior to initiation of their dissertation research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10428545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104285452023-08-17 Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning Schaller, Michael D. Gencheva, Marieta Gunther, Michael R. Weed, Scott A. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Traditionally, doctoral student education in the biomedical sciences relies on didactic coursework to build a foundation of scientific knowledge and an apprenticeship model of training in the laboratory of an established investigator. Recent recommendations for revision of graduate training include the utilization of graduate student competencies to assess progress and the introduction of novel curricula focused on development of skills, rather than accumulation of facts. Evidence demonstrates that active learning approaches are effective. Several facets of active learning are components of problem-based learning (PBL), which is a teaching modality where student learning is self-directed toward solving problems in a relevant context. These concepts were combined and incorporated in creating a new introductory graduate course designed to develop scientific skills (student competencies) in matriculating doctoral students using a PBL format. METHODS: Evaluation of course effectiveness was measured using the principals of the Kirkpatrick Four Level Model of Evaluation. At the end of each course offering, students completed evaluation surveys on the course and instructors to assess their perceptions of training effectiveness. Pre- and post-tests assessing students’ proficiency in experimental design were used to measure student learning. RESULTS: The analysis of the outcomes of the course suggests the training is effective in improving experimental design. The course was well received by the students as measured by student evaluations (Kirkpatrick Model Level 1). Improved scores on post-tests indicate that the students learned from the experience (Kirkpatrick Model Level 2). A template is provided for the implementation of similar courses at other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: This problem-based learning course appears effective in training newly matriculated graduate students in the required skills for designing experiments to test specific hypotheses, enhancing student preparation prior to initiation of their dissertation research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7. BioMed Central 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10428545/ /pubmed/37587476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Schaller, Michael D. Gencheva, Marieta Gunther, Michael R. Weed, Scott A. Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
title | Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
title_full | Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
title_fullStr | Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
title_short | Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
title_sort | training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schallermichaeld trainingdoctoralstudentsincriticalthinkingandexperimentaldesignusingproblembasedlearning AT genchevamarieta trainingdoctoralstudentsincriticalthinkingandexperimentaldesignusingproblembasedlearning AT gunthermichaelr trainingdoctoralstudentsincriticalthinkingandexperimentaldesignusingproblembasedlearning AT weedscotta trainingdoctoralstudentsincriticalthinkingandexperimentaldesignusingproblembasedlearning |