Cargando…
Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study
BACKGROUND: Studies have documented that utilizing peer feedback can enhance students’ English academic writing skills. Little is known, however, about the effects of incorporating peer feedback to enhance English as a second language (L2) medical students’ academic writing performance. METHODS: Thi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w |
_version_ | 1785090520740003840 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Chenze Zhang, Yao-Wu Li, Albert W. |
author_facet | Wu, Chenze Zhang, Yao-Wu Li, Albert W. |
author_sort | Wu, Chenze |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies have documented that utilizing peer feedback can enhance students’ English academic writing skills. Little is known, however, about the effects of incorporating peer feedback to enhance English as a second language (L2) medical students’ academic writing performance. METHODS: This longitudinal interventional study examines Chinese medical students’ English academic writing skills development via peer feedback in four parallel classes over an 18-week semester between the experimental and control groups (n = 124). RESULTS: Significant increases in the experimental group’s performance in the post-test were found after 18-week instructions (pre- vs. post-test: overall score, p < .001; task response, p < .001; coherence and cohesion, p < .001; lexical resource, p < .001; grammatical range and accuracy, p < .001), and the effects were retained in the delayed post-test 6 weeks later (post- vs. delayed post-test: overall score, p = .561; task response, p = .585; coherence and cohesion, p = .533; lexical resource, p = .796; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .670). Little improvement was found in the control group in the post-test (pre- vs. post-test: overall score, p = .213; task response, p = .275; coherence and cohesion, p = .383; lexical resource, p = .367; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .180) or the delayed post-test (post- vs. delayed post-test: overall score, p = .835; task response, p = .742; coherence and cohesion, p = .901; lexical resource, p = .897; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .695). Between-group comparisons indicate that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the post- and the delayed post-tests, as shown in their overall score and scores on the four components. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating peer feedback into process-oriented medical English writing classroom teaching can effectively enhance Chinese medical students’ English academic writing skills over time, while the traditional product-oriented writing instructions had little help in improving Chinese medical students’ academic writing skills. This longitudinal intervention study develops our understanding of the effectiveness of peer feedback in L2 academic writing pedagogy. It offers instructional implications for L2 writing teachers to teach English academic writing among medical students in China and beyond. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10428647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104286472023-08-17 Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study Wu, Chenze Zhang, Yao-Wu Li, Albert W. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Studies have documented that utilizing peer feedback can enhance students’ English academic writing skills. Little is known, however, about the effects of incorporating peer feedback to enhance English as a second language (L2) medical students’ academic writing performance. METHODS: This longitudinal interventional study examines Chinese medical students’ English academic writing skills development via peer feedback in four parallel classes over an 18-week semester between the experimental and control groups (n = 124). RESULTS: Significant increases in the experimental group’s performance in the post-test were found after 18-week instructions (pre- vs. post-test: overall score, p < .001; task response, p < .001; coherence and cohesion, p < .001; lexical resource, p < .001; grammatical range and accuracy, p < .001), and the effects were retained in the delayed post-test 6 weeks later (post- vs. delayed post-test: overall score, p = .561; task response, p = .585; coherence and cohesion, p = .533; lexical resource, p = .796; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .670). Little improvement was found in the control group in the post-test (pre- vs. post-test: overall score, p = .213; task response, p = .275; coherence and cohesion, p = .383; lexical resource, p = .367; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .180) or the delayed post-test (post- vs. delayed post-test: overall score, p = .835; task response, p = .742; coherence and cohesion, p = .901; lexical resource, p = .897; grammatical range and accuracy, p = .695). Between-group comparisons indicate that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the post- and the delayed post-tests, as shown in their overall score and scores on the four components. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating peer feedback into process-oriented medical English writing classroom teaching can effectively enhance Chinese medical students’ English academic writing skills over time, while the traditional product-oriented writing instructions had little help in improving Chinese medical students’ academic writing skills. This longitudinal intervention study develops our understanding of the effectiveness of peer feedback in L2 academic writing pedagogy. It offers instructional implications for L2 writing teachers to teach English academic writing among medical students in China and beyond. Limitations and suggestions for future studies are discussed. BioMed Central 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10428647/ /pubmed/37587429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wu, Chenze Zhang, Yao-Wu Li, Albert W. Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
title | Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
title_full | Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
title_fullStr | Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
title_short | Peer feedback and Chinese medical students’ English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
title_sort | peer feedback and chinese medical students’ english academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuchenze peerfeedbackandchinesemedicalstudentsenglishacademicwritingdevelopmentalongitudinalinterventionstudy AT zhangyaowu peerfeedbackandchinesemedicalstudentsenglishacademicwritingdevelopmentalongitudinalinterventionstudy AT lialbertw peerfeedbackandchinesemedicalstudentsenglishacademicwritingdevelopmentalongitudinalinterventionstudy |