Design, Synthesis, ADME, and Anticancer Studies of Newer N-Aryl-5-(3,4,5-Trifluorophenyl)-1,3,4-Oxadiazol-2-Amines: An Insight into Experimental and Theoretical Investigations

[Image: see text] In continuance of our investigation into the anticancer activity of oxadiazoles, we report here the preparation of 10 new 1,3,4-oxadiazole analogues using the scaffold hopping technique. We have prepared the oxadiazoles having a common pharmacophoric structure (oxadiazole linked aryl nucleus) as seen in the reported anticancer agents IMC-038525 (tubulin inhibitor), IMC-094332 (tubulin inhibitor), and FATB (isosteric replacement of the S of thiadiazole with the O of oxadiazole). All of the oxadiazole analogues were predicted for their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profiles and toxicity studies. All of the compounds were found to follow Lipinski’s rule of 5 with a safe toxicity profile (Class IV compound) against immunotoxicity, mutagenicity, and toxicity. All of the compounds were synthesized and characterized using spectral data, followed by their anticancer activity tested in a single-dose assay at 10 μM as reported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI US) Protocol against nearly 59 cancer cell lines obtained from nine panels, including non-small-cell lung, ovarian, breast, central nervous system (CNS), colon, leukemia, prostate, and cancer melanoma. N-(2,4-Dimethylphenyl)-5-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine (6h) displayed significant anticancer activity against SNB-19, OVCAR-8, and NCI-H40 with percent growth inhibitions (PGIs) of 86.61, 85.26, and 75.99 and moderate anticancer activity against HOP-92, SNB-75, ACHN, NCI/ADR-RES, 786-O, A549/ATCC, HCT-116, MDA-MB-231, and SF-295 with PGIs of 67.55, 65.46, 59.09, 59.02, 57.88, 56.88, 56.53, 56.4, and 51.88, respectively. The compound 6h also registered better anticancer activity than Imatinib against CNS, ovarian, renal, breast, prostate, and melanoma cancers with average PGIs of 56.18, 40.41, 36.36, 27.61, 22.61, and 10.33, respectively. Molecular docking against tubulin, one of the appealing cancer targets, demonstrated an efficient binding within the binding site of combretastatin A4. The ligand 6h (docking score = −8.144 kcal/mol) interacted π-cationically with the residue Lys352 (with the oxadiazole ring). Furthermore, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation studies in complex with the tubulin-combretastatin A4 protein and ligand 6h were performed to examine the dynamic stability and conformational behavior.