Cargando…
Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution
The risk of severe adverse events related to thiopurine therapy can be reduced by personalizing dosing based on TPMT and NUDT15 genetic polymorphisms. However, the optimal genetic testing platform has not yet been established. In this study, we report on the TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes and phenotypes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13539 |
_version_ | 1785091524155932672 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Kelsey J. Grusauskas, Victoria Gloe, Lucy Duong, Benjamin Q. Gresh, Renee C. Kolb, E. Anders Bansal, Manisha Bechtel, Allison S. Nagasubramanian, Ramamoorthy Kirwin, Susan M. Blake, Kathryn V. Seligson, Nathan D. |
author_facet | Cook, Kelsey J. Grusauskas, Victoria Gloe, Lucy Duong, Benjamin Q. Gresh, Renee C. Kolb, E. Anders Bansal, Manisha Bechtel, Allison S. Nagasubramanian, Ramamoorthy Kirwin, Susan M. Blake, Kathryn V. Seligson, Nathan D. |
author_sort | Cook, Kelsey J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The risk of severe adverse events related to thiopurine therapy can be reduced by personalizing dosing based on TPMT and NUDT15 genetic polymorphisms. However, the optimal genetic testing platform has not yet been established. In this study, we report on the TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes and phenotypes generated from 320 patients from a multicenter pediatric healthcare system using both Sanger sequencing and polymerase chain reaction genotyping (hereafter: genotyping) methods to determine the appropriateness of genotyping in our patient population. Sanger sequencing identified variant TPMT alleles including *3A (8, 3.2% of alleles), *3C (4, 1.6%), and *2 (1, 0.4%), and NUDT15 alleles including *2 (5, 3.6%) and *3 (1, 0.7%). For genotyped patients, variants identified in TPMT included *3A (12, 3.1%), *3C (4, 1%), *2 (2, 0.5%), and *8 (1, 0.25%), whereas NUDT15 included *4 (2, 1.9%) and *2 or *3 (1, 1%). Between Sanger sequencing and genotyping, no significant difference in allele, genotype, or phenotype frequency was identified for either TPMT or NUDT15. All patients who were tested using Sanger sequencing would have been accurately phenotyped for either TPMT (124/124), NUDT15 (69/69), or both genes (68/68) if they were assayed using the genotyping method. Considering 193 total TPMT and NUDT15 Sanger Sequencing tests reviewed, all tests would have resulted in an appropriate clinical recommendation if the test had instead been conducted using the comparison genotyping platforms. These results suggest that, in this study population, genotyping would be sufficient to provide accurate phenotype calls and clinical recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10432880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104328802023-08-18 Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution Cook, Kelsey J. Grusauskas, Victoria Gloe, Lucy Duong, Benjamin Q. Gresh, Renee C. Kolb, E. Anders Bansal, Manisha Bechtel, Allison S. Nagasubramanian, Ramamoorthy Kirwin, Susan M. Blake, Kathryn V. Seligson, Nathan D. Clin Transl Sci Research The risk of severe adverse events related to thiopurine therapy can be reduced by personalizing dosing based on TPMT and NUDT15 genetic polymorphisms. However, the optimal genetic testing platform has not yet been established. In this study, we report on the TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes and phenotypes generated from 320 patients from a multicenter pediatric healthcare system using both Sanger sequencing and polymerase chain reaction genotyping (hereafter: genotyping) methods to determine the appropriateness of genotyping in our patient population. Sanger sequencing identified variant TPMT alleles including *3A (8, 3.2% of alleles), *3C (4, 1.6%), and *2 (1, 0.4%), and NUDT15 alleles including *2 (5, 3.6%) and *3 (1, 0.7%). For genotyped patients, variants identified in TPMT included *3A (12, 3.1%), *3C (4, 1%), *2 (2, 0.5%), and *8 (1, 0.25%), whereas NUDT15 included *4 (2, 1.9%) and *2 or *3 (1, 1%). Between Sanger sequencing and genotyping, no significant difference in allele, genotype, or phenotype frequency was identified for either TPMT or NUDT15. All patients who were tested using Sanger sequencing would have been accurately phenotyped for either TPMT (124/124), NUDT15 (69/69), or both genes (68/68) if they were assayed using the genotyping method. Considering 193 total TPMT and NUDT15 Sanger Sequencing tests reviewed, all tests would have resulted in an appropriate clinical recommendation if the test had instead been conducted using the comparison genotyping platforms. These results suggest that, in this study population, genotyping would be sufficient to provide accurate phenotype calls and clinical recommendations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10432880/ /pubmed/37415296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13539 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Cook, Kelsey J. Grusauskas, Victoria Gloe, Lucy Duong, Benjamin Q. Gresh, Renee C. Kolb, E. Anders Bansal, Manisha Bechtel, Allison S. Nagasubramanian, Ramamoorthy Kirwin, Susan M. Blake, Kathryn V. Seligson, Nathan D. Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
title | Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
title_full | Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
title_fullStr | Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
title_short | Comparison of variants in TPMT and NUDT15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
title_sort | comparison of variants in tpmt and nudt15 between sequencing and genotyping methods in a multistate pediatric institution |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookkelseyj comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT grusauskasvictoria comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT gloelucy comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT duongbenjaminq comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT greshreneec comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT kolbeanders comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT bansalmanisha comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT bechtelallisons comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT nagasubramanianramamoorthy comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT kirwinsusanm comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT blakekathrynv comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution AT seligsonnathand comparisonofvariantsintpmtandnudt15betweensequencingandgenotypingmethodsinamultistatepediatricinstitution |