Cargando…
Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization
Rapidly producing drug-like antibody therapeutics for lead molecule discovery and candidate optimization is typically accomplished by large-scale transient gene expression technologies (TGE) with cultivated mammalian cells. The TGE methodologies have been extensively developed over the past three de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37606437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antib12030053 |
_version_ | 1785093789500571648 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Jing Yan, Guoying Grace Cluckey, David Meade, Caryl Ruth, Margaret Sorm, Rhady Tam, Amy S. Lim, Sean Petridis, Constantine Lin, Laura D’Antona, Aaron M. Zhong, Xiaotian |
author_facet | Zhou, Jing Yan, Guoying Grace Cluckey, David Meade, Caryl Ruth, Margaret Sorm, Rhady Tam, Amy S. Lim, Sean Petridis, Constantine Lin, Laura D’Antona, Aaron M. Zhong, Xiaotian |
author_sort | Zhou, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapidly producing drug-like antibody therapeutics for lead molecule discovery and candidate optimization is typically accomplished by large-scale transient gene expression technologies (TGE) with cultivated mammalian cells. The TGE methodologies have been extensively developed over the past three decades, yet produce significantly lower yields than the stable cell line approach, facing the technical challenge of achieving universal high expression titers for a broad range of antibodies and therapeutics modalities. In this study, we explored various parameters for antibody production in the TGE cell host Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) with the transfection reagents ExpiFectamine(TM) and polyethylenimine. We discovered that there are significant differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) cells with regards to DNA complex formation time and ratio, complex formation buffers, DNA complex uptake trafficking routes, responses to dimethyl sulfoxide and cell cycle inhibitors, as well as light-chain isotype expression preferences. This investigation mechanistically dissected the TGE processes and provided a new direction for future transient antibody production optimization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10443273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104432732023-08-23 Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization Zhou, Jing Yan, Guoying Grace Cluckey, David Meade, Caryl Ruth, Margaret Sorm, Rhady Tam, Amy S. Lim, Sean Petridis, Constantine Lin, Laura D’Antona, Aaron M. Zhong, Xiaotian Antibodies (Basel) Article Rapidly producing drug-like antibody therapeutics for lead molecule discovery and candidate optimization is typically accomplished by large-scale transient gene expression technologies (TGE) with cultivated mammalian cells. The TGE methodologies have been extensively developed over the past three decades, yet produce significantly lower yields than the stable cell line approach, facing the technical challenge of achieving universal high expression titers for a broad range of antibodies and therapeutics modalities. In this study, we explored various parameters for antibody production in the TGE cell host Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) with the transfection reagents ExpiFectamine(TM) and polyethylenimine. We discovered that there are significant differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) cells with regards to DNA complex formation time and ratio, complex formation buffers, DNA complex uptake trafficking routes, responses to dimethyl sulfoxide and cell cycle inhibitors, as well as light-chain isotype expression preferences. This investigation mechanistically dissected the TGE processes and provided a new direction for future transient antibody production optimization. MDPI 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10443273/ /pubmed/37606437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antib12030053 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Jing Yan, Guoying Grace Cluckey, David Meade, Caryl Ruth, Margaret Sorm, Rhady Tam, Amy S. Lim, Sean Petridis, Constantine Lin, Laura D’Antona, Aaron M. Zhong, Xiaotian Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization |
title | Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization |
title_full | Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization |
title_fullStr | Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization |
title_short | Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293F(TM) and ExpiCHO-S(TM) Cells for Transient Antibody Production Optimization |
title_sort | exploring parametric and mechanistic differences between expi293f(tm) and expicho-s(tm) cells for transient antibody production optimization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37606437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antib12030053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoujing exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT yanguoyinggrace exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT cluckeydavid exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT meadecaryl exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT ruthmargaret exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT sormrhady exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT tamamys exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT limsean exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT petridisconstantine exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT linlaura exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT dantonaaaronm exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization AT zhongxiaotian exploringparametricandmechanisticdifferencesbetweenexpi293ftmandexpichostmcellsfortransientantibodyproductionoptimization |