Cargando…

Individual transcriptomic response to strength training for patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), the most common form of adult-onset muscular dystrophy, is caused by a CTG expansion resulting in significant transcriptomic dysregulation that leads to muscle weakness and wasting. While strength training is clinically beneficial in DM1, molecular effects had not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davey, Emily E., Légaré, Cécilia, Planco, Lori, Shaughnessy, Sharon, Lennon, Claudia D., Roussel, Marie-Pier, Shorrock, Hannah K., Hung, Man, Cleary, John Douglas, Duchesne, Elise, Berglund, J. Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Clinical Investigation 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.163856
Descripción
Sumario:Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), the most common form of adult-onset muscular dystrophy, is caused by a CTG expansion resulting in significant transcriptomic dysregulation that leads to muscle weakness and wasting. While strength training is clinically beneficial in DM1, molecular effects had not been studied. To determine whether training rescued transcriptomic defects, RNA-Seq was performed on vastus lateralis samples from 9 male patients with DM1 before and after a 12-week strength-training program and 6 male controls who did not undergo training. Differential gene expression and alternative splicing analysis were correlated with the one-repetition maximum strength evaluation method (leg extension, leg press, hip abduction, and squat). While training program–induced improvements in splicing were similar among most individuals, rescued splicing events varied considerably between individuals. Gene expression improvements were highly varied between individuals, and the percentage of differentially expressed genes rescued after training were strongly correlated with strength improvements. Evaluating transcriptome changes individually revealed responses to the training not evident from grouped analysis, likely due to disease heterogeneity and individual exercise response differences. Our analyses indicate that transcriptomic changes are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with DM1 undergoing training and that these changes are often specific to the individual and should be analyzed accordingly.