Cargando…

Germline (epi)genetics reveals high predisposition in females: a 5-year, nationwide, prospective Wilms tumour cohort

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that Wilms tumours (WT) are caused by underlying genetic (5%–10%) and epigenetic (2%–29%) mechanisms, yet studies covering both aspects are sparse. METHODS: We performed prospective whole-genome sequencing of germline DNA in Danish children diagnosed with WT from 2016 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoltze, Ulrik Kristoffer, Hildonen, Mathis, Hansen, Thomas Van Overeem, Foss-Skiftesvik, Jon, Byrjalsen, Anna, Lundsgaard, Malene, Pignata, Laura, Grønskov, Karen, Tumer, Zeynep, Schmiegelow, Kjeld, Brok, Jesper Sune, Wadt, Karin A W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37019617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2022-108982
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that Wilms tumours (WT) are caused by underlying genetic (5%–10%) and epigenetic (2%–29%) mechanisms, yet studies covering both aspects are sparse. METHODS: We performed prospective whole-genome sequencing of germline DNA in Danish children diagnosed with WT from 2016 to 2021, and linked genotypes to deep phenotypes. RESULTS: Of 24 patients (58% female), 3 (13%, all female) harboured pathogenic germline variants in WT risk genes (FBXW7, WT1 and REST). Only one patient had a family history of WT (3 cases), segregating with the REST variant. Epigenetic testing revealed one (4%) additional patient (female) with uniparental disomy of chromosome 11 and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS). We observed a tendency of higher methylation of the BWS-related imprinting centre 1 in patients with WT than in healthy controls. Three patients (13%, all female) with bilateral tumours and/or features of BWS had higher birth weights (4780 g vs 3575 g; p=0.002). We observed more patients with macrosomia (>4250 g, n=5, all female) than expected (OR 9.98 (95% CI 2.56 to 34.66)). Genes involved in early kidney development were enriched in our constrained gene analysis, including both known (WT1, FBXW7) and candidate (CTNND1, FRMD4A) WT predisposition genes. WT predisposing variants, BWS and/or macrosomia (n=8, all female) were more common in female patients than male patients (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: We find that most females (57%) and 33% of all patients with WT had either a genetic or another indicator of WT predisposition. This emphasises the need for scrutiny when diagnosing patients with WT, as early detection of underlying predisposition may impact treatment, follow-up and genetic counselling.