Cargando…

Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes

INTRODUCTION: The association of plant-based dietary patterns with health outcomes has traditionally been assessed without considering nutritional value. The plant-based dietary index (PDI), first published in 2016, overcomes this limitation with both a healthful PDI (hPDI) and an unhealthful PDI (u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenfeld, Richard M., Juszczak, Hailey M., Wong, Michele A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1211535
_version_ 1785094608958521344
author Rosenfeld, Richard M.
Juszczak, Hailey M.
Wong, Michele A.
author_facet Rosenfeld, Richard M.
Juszczak, Hailey M.
Wong, Michele A.
author_sort Rosenfeld, Richard M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The association of plant-based dietary patterns with health outcomes has traditionally been assessed without considering nutritional value. The plant-based dietary index (PDI), first published in 2016, overcomes this limitation with both a healthful PDI (hPDI) and an unhealthful PDI (uPDI), based on the quality of plant foods consumed plus the frequency of animal foods. We sought to summarize the breadth of research using the hPDI and uPDI to gain insight into how the quality of plant-based dietary patterns might be associated with health outcomes. METHODS: Scoping review of studies that used the PDI, hPDI, or uPDI to report associations with health outcomes. Multiple databases were searched from 2010 through April 2023 with 2 authors independently assessing eligibility and extracting data. In addition to assessing the association of the indices to health outcomes, we determined the frequency of concordant or discordant findings for hPDI versus PDI and for hPDI versus uPDI. RESULTS: We included 95 articles (54% longitudinal, 37% cross-sectional, and 9% case–control) with a median sample size of 3,646. Higher hPDI levels were associated with favorable health outcomes in 36% of comparisons (most often for obesity, mortality, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric disorders), compared to 25% for the PDI and only 2% for the uPDI. Conversely, higher levels of the uPDI were associated with unfavorable health outcomes in 33% of comparisons, in contrast to under 1% for the hPDI and 2% for the PDI. When the hPDI association to an outcome was discordant with the uPDI or PDI, the significance and directionality always favored the hPDI over the uPDI, and nearly always favored the hPDI over the PDI. DISCUSSION: Dietary indices that account for the quality of plant foods can show health benefits that might be missed by a generic plant-based index. A greater focus on the quality of plant foods could improve nutrition guidelines, raise awareness about the benefits of adding unrefined plant foods to the diet, and empower consumers to make incremental additions of such foods to displace unhealthy foods. We anticipate increasing use of indices that address food quality in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104479112023-08-25 Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes Rosenfeld, Richard M. Juszczak, Hailey M. Wong, Michele A. Front Nutr Nutrition INTRODUCTION: The association of plant-based dietary patterns with health outcomes has traditionally been assessed without considering nutritional value. The plant-based dietary index (PDI), first published in 2016, overcomes this limitation with both a healthful PDI (hPDI) and an unhealthful PDI (uPDI), based on the quality of plant foods consumed plus the frequency of animal foods. We sought to summarize the breadth of research using the hPDI and uPDI to gain insight into how the quality of plant-based dietary patterns might be associated with health outcomes. METHODS: Scoping review of studies that used the PDI, hPDI, or uPDI to report associations with health outcomes. Multiple databases were searched from 2010 through April 2023 with 2 authors independently assessing eligibility and extracting data. In addition to assessing the association of the indices to health outcomes, we determined the frequency of concordant or discordant findings for hPDI versus PDI and for hPDI versus uPDI. RESULTS: We included 95 articles (54% longitudinal, 37% cross-sectional, and 9% case–control) with a median sample size of 3,646. Higher hPDI levels were associated with favorable health outcomes in 36% of comparisons (most often for obesity, mortality, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric disorders), compared to 25% for the PDI and only 2% for the uPDI. Conversely, higher levels of the uPDI were associated with unfavorable health outcomes in 33% of comparisons, in contrast to under 1% for the hPDI and 2% for the PDI. When the hPDI association to an outcome was discordant with the uPDI or PDI, the significance and directionality always favored the hPDI over the uPDI, and nearly always favored the hPDI over the PDI. DISCUSSION: Dietary indices that account for the quality of plant foods can show health benefits that might be missed by a generic plant-based index. A greater focus on the quality of plant foods could improve nutrition guidelines, raise awareness about the benefits of adding unrefined plant foods to the diet, and empower consumers to make incremental additions of such foods to displace unhealthy foods. We anticipate increasing use of indices that address food quality in future research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10447911/ /pubmed/37637943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1211535 Text en Copyright © 2023 Rosenfeld, Juszczak and Wong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Rosenfeld, Richard M.
Juszczak, Hailey M.
Wong, Michele A.
Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
title Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
title_full Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
title_fullStr Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
title_short Scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
title_sort scoping review of the association of plant-based diet quality with health outcomes
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1211535
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenfeldrichardm scopingreviewoftheassociationofplantbaseddietqualitywithhealthoutcomes
AT juszczakhaileym scopingreviewoftheassociationofplantbaseddietqualitywithhealthoutcomes
AT wongmichelea scopingreviewoftheassociationofplantbaseddietqualitywithhealthoutcomes