Cargando…

Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic required the University of Arizona R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy’s Self-Care Therapeutics course to be taught as a synchronous, live online course. The course has traditionally utilized a flipped-classroom to increase student engagement and improve learning perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cornelison, Bernadette, Zerr, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04581-x
_version_ 1785098236164308992
author Cornelison, Bernadette
Zerr, Beth
author_facet Cornelison, Bernadette
Zerr, Beth
author_sort Cornelison, Bernadette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic required the University of Arizona R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy’s Self-Care Therapeutics course to be taught as a synchronous, live online course. The course has traditionally utilized a flipped-classroom to increase student engagement and improve learning performance. The goal of this study is to compare student performance in a flipped-classroom self-care therapeutics course taught to students attending class on-campus versus online via web-conferencing. METHODS: This study assessed examination performance of 118 students that took the class on-campus in 2019 and 125 students that took the class online in 2020. Course design was similar between the two cohorts, with each completing assigned pre-reading, an associated short multiple-choice quiz, in-class small group discussions and in-class large group faculty-led debrief. Both cohorts took pre-class quizzes and three examinations to assess their knowledge. Exam, quiz, overall class performance, and student experience was compared for the 2019 on-campus attending cohort and the 2020 online attending cohort. RESULTS: No statistical differences were seen in the overall exam performance, the final course score, and the student experience between cohorts. Statistical differences (p = 0.02) were found between cohorts for the overall quiz performance, with the on-campus attending cohort performing slightly better than the online attending cohort (mean score of 88% compared to 84.4%). CONCLUSION: Examination performance was similar for students taking a flipped-classroom course online and on-campus. Further research using data from multiple courses or from the same cohort, randomized, is needed to improve the internal and external validity of these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10463454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104634542023-08-30 Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely Cornelison, Bernadette Zerr, Beth BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic required the University of Arizona R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy’s Self-Care Therapeutics course to be taught as a synchronous, live online course. The course has traditionally utilized a flipped-classroom to increase student engagement and improve learning performance. The goal of this study is to compare student performance in a flipped-classroom self-care therapeutics course taught to students attending class on-campus versus online via web-conferencing. METHODS: This study assessed examination performance of 118 students that took the class on-campus in 2019 and 125 students that took the class online in 2020. Course design was similar between the two cohorts, with each completing assigned pre-reading, an associated short multiple-choice quiz, in-class small group discussions and in-class large group faculty-led debrief. Both cohorts took pre-class quizzes and three examinations to assess their knowledge. Exam, quiz, overall class performance, and student experience was compared for the 2019 on-campus attending cohort and the 2020 online attending cohort. RESULTS: No statistical differences were seen in the overall exam performance, the final course score, and the student experience between cohorts. Statistical differences (p = 0.02) were found between cohorts for the overall quiz performance, with the on-campus attending cohort performing slightly better than the online attending cohort (mean score of 88% compared to 84.4%). CONCLUSION: Examination performance was similar for students taking a flipped-classroom course online and on-campus. Further research using data from multiple courses or from the same cohort, randomized, is needed to improve the internal and external validity of these findings. BioMed Central 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10463454/ /pubmed/37608266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04581-x Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cornelison, Bernadette
Zerr, Beth
Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
title Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
title_full Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
title_fullStr Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
title_short Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
title_sort comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04581-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cornelisonbernadette comparisonofpharmacystudentperformanceinaselfcaretherapeuticscourseconductedasaflippedclassroomoncampusandremotely
AT zerrbeth comparisonofpharmacystudentperformanceinaselfcaretherapeuticscourseconductedasaflippedclassroomoncampusandremotely