Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive. E 900 was evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1990 and agreed with the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 1.5 mg/kg body weig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika, Wölfle, Detlef, Wright, Matthew, Boon, Polly, Tobback, Paul, Giarola, Alessandra, Rincon, Ana Maria, Tard, Alexandra, Moldeus, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649521
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6107
_version_ 1785098523599962112
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Tobback, Paul
Giarola, Alessandra
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Moldeus, Peter
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Tobback, Paul
Giarola, Alessandra
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Moldeus, Peter
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive. E 900 was evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1990 and agreed with the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 1.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day previously established by Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1974. Dimethyl polysiloxane was only absorbed to a very limited extent from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration and the vast majority was excreted unchanged in the faeces. Corneal opacities and other effects on cornea were observed in studies in rats. These effects are considered to be caused by direct contact with the test substance in the feed and/or with the test substance in the faeces and not due to systemic exposure. The Panel considered that oral exposure of dimethyl polysiloxane did not result in any systemic adverse effects in any species and dose tested and there is no concern with respect to genotoxicity of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). From a 26‐month toxicity study in rats, a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1,742 and 2,055 mg dimethyl polysiloxane/kg bw per day for female and male, respectively, was identified. Using the NOAEL 1,742 mg/kg bw per day, the Panel established an ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900 by applying an uncertainty factor of 100. Accordingly, the ADI for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) of 1.5 mg/kg bw per day, established by SCF in 1990, is withdrawn. The exposure estimates for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900. The Panel concluded that there is not a safety concern at the reported uses and use levels for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). The Panel also proposed a number of recommendations for the EU specifications to be amended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10464691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104646912023-08-30 Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Giarola, Alessandra Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive. E 900 was evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1990 and agreed with the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 1.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day previously established by Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1974. Dimethyl polysiloxane was only absorbed to a very limited extent from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration and the vast majority was excreted unchanged in the faeces. Corneal opacities and other effects on cornea were observed in studies in rats. These effects are considered to be caused by direct contact with the test substance in the feed and/or with the test substance in the faeces and not due to systemic exposure. The Panel considered that oral exposure of dimethyl polysiloxane did not result in any systemic adverse effects in any species and dose tested and there is no concern with respect to genotoxicity of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). From a 26‐month toxicity study in rats, a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1,742 and 2,055 mg dimethyl polysiloxane/kg bw per day for female and male, respectively, was identified. Using the NOAEL 1,742 mg/kg bw per day, the Panel established an ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900 by applying an uncertainty factor of 100. Accordingly, the ADI for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) of 1.5 mg/kg bw per day, established by SCF in 1990, is withdrawn. The exposure estimates for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900. The Panel concluded that there is not a safety concern at the reported uses and use levels for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). The Panel also proposed a number of recommendations for the EU specifications to be amended. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10464691/ /pubmed/37649521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6107 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Tobback, Paul
Giarola, Alessandra
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Moldeus, Peter
Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
title Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
title_full Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
title_short Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
title_sort re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (e 900) as a food additive
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649521
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6107
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT younesmaged reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT castlelaurence reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT fowlerpaul reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT furstpeter reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT husøytrine reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT mancomelania reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT menneswim reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT passamontisabina reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT shahromina reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT waalkensberendsendinahendrika reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT boonpolly reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT giarolaalessandra reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive