Cargando…
Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive
The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive. E 900 was evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1990 and agreed with the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 1.5 mg/kg body weig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6107 |
_version_ | 1785098523599962112 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Giarola, Alessandra Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Giarola, Alessandra Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive. E 900 was evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1990 and agreed with the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 1.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day previously established by Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1974. Dimethyl polysiloxane was only absorbed to a very limited extent from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration and the vast majority was excreted unchanged in the faeces. Corneal opacities and other effects on cornea were observed in studies in rats. These effects are considered to be caused by direct contact with the test substance in the feed and/or with the test substance in the faeces and not due to systemic exposure. The Panel considered that oral exposure of dimethyl polysiloxane did not result in any systemic adverse effects in any species and dose tested and there is no concern with respect to genotoxicity of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). From a 26‐month toxicity study in rats, a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1,742 and 2,055 mg dimethyl polysiloxane/kg bw per day for female and male, respectively, was identified. Using the NOAEL 1,742 mg/kg bw per day, the Panel established an ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900 by applying an uncertainty factor of 100. Accordingly, the ADI for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) of 1.5 mg/kg bw per day, established by SCF in 1990, is withdrawn. The exposure estimates for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900. The Panel concluded that there is not a safety concern at the reported uses and use levels for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). The Panel also proposed a number of recommendations for the EU specifications to be amended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10464691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104646912023-08-30 Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Giarola, Alessandra Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive. E 900 was evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) in 1990 and agreed with the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 1.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day previously established by Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1974. Dimethyl polysiloxane was only absorbed to a very limited extent from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration and the vast majority was excreted unchanged in the faeces. Corneal opacities and other effects on cornea were observed in studies in rats. These effects are considered to be caused by direct contact with the test substance in the feed and/or with the test substance in the faeces and not due to systemic exposure. The Panel considered that oral exposure of dimethyl polysiloxane did not result in any systemic adverse effects in any species and dose tested and there is no concern with respect to genotoxicity of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). From a 26‐month toxicity study in rats, a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1,742 and 2,055 mg dimethyl polysiloxane/kg bw per day for female and male, respectively, was identified. Using the NOAEL 1,742 mg/kg bw per day, the Panel established an ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900 by applying an uncertainty factor of 100. Accordingly, the ADI for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) of 1.5 mg/kg bw per day, established by SCF in 1990, is withdrawn. The exposure estimates for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI of 17 mg/kg bw per day for E 900. The Panel concluded that there is not a safety concern at the reported uses and use levels for dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900). The Panel also proposed a number of recommendations for the EU specifications to be amended. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10464691/ /pubmed/37649521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6107 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Giarola, Alessandra Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive |
title | Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive |
title_full | Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive |
title_fullStr | Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive |
title_full_unstemmed | Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive |
title_short | Re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (E 900) as a food additive |
title_sort | re‐evaluation of dimethyl polysiloxane (e 900) as a food additive |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT younesmaged reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT castlelaurence reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT fowlerpaul reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT furstpeter reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT husøytrine reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT mancomelania reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT menneswim reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT passamontisabina reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT shahromina reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT waalkensberendsendinahendrika reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT boonpolly reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT giarolaalessandra reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT tardalexandra reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofdimethylpolysiloxanee900asafoodadditive |