Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews

Mostrar otras versiones (3)

Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolaski, Kat, Logan, Lynne Romeiser, Ioannidis, John P.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Methodology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282594
http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00139

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282594
http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00139

Ejemplares similares