Cargando…
Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile
Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are responsible for a significant number of antibiotic-associated diarrheal cases. The standard-of-care antibiotics for C. difficile are limited to fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with the recently obsolete metronidazole recommended if both are unavailable. No...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36796-9 |
_version_ | 1785102694987333632 |
---|---|
author | Johnstone, Michael A. Holman, Matthew A. Self, William T. |
author_facet | Johnstone, Michael A. Holman, Matthew A. Self, William T. |
author_sort | Johnstone, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are responsible for a significant number of antibiotic-associated diarrheal cases. The standard-of-care antibiotics for C. difficile are limited to fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with the recently obsolete metronidazole recommended if both are unavailable. No new antimicrobials have been approved for CDI since fidaxomicin in 2011, despite varying rates of treatment failure among all standard-of-care drugs. Drug repurposing is a rational strategy to generate new antimicrobials out of existing therapeutics approved for other indications. Auranofin is a gold-containing anti-rheumatic drug with antimicrobial activity against C. difficile and other microbes. In a previous report, our group hypothesized that inhibition of selenoprotein biosynthesis was auranofin’s primary mechanism of action against C. difficile. However, in this study, we discovered that C. difficile mutants lacking selenoproteins are still just as sensitive to auranofin as their respective wild-type strains. Moreover, we found that selenite supplementation dampens the activity of auranofin against C. difficile regardless of the presence of selenoproteins, suggesting that selenite’s neutralization of auranofin is not because of compensation for a chemically induced selenium deficiency. Our results clarify the findings of our original study and may aid drug repurposing efforts in discovering the compound’s true mechanism of action against C. difficile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10484987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104849872023-09-09 Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile Johnstone, Michael A. Holman, Matthew A. Self, William T. Sci Rep Article Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are responsible for a significant number of antibiotic-associated diarrheal cases. The standard-of-care antibiotics for C. difficile are limited to fidaxomicin and vancomycin, with the recently obsolete metronidazole recommended if both are unavailable. No new antimicrobials have been approved for CDI since fidaxomicin in 2011, despite varying rates of treatment failure among all standard-of-care drugs. Drug repurposing is a rational strategy to generate new antimicrobials out of existing therapeutics approved for other indications. Auranofin is a gold-containing anti-rheumatic drug with antimicrobial activity against C. difficile and other microbes. In a previous report, our group hypothesized that inhibition of selenoprotein biosynthesis was auranofin’s primary mechanism of action against C. difficile. However, in this study, we discovered that C. difficile mutants lacking selenoproteins are still just as sensitive to auranofin as their respective wild-type strains. Moreover, we found that selenite supplementation dampens the activity of auranofin against C. difficile regardless of the presence of selenoproteins, suggesting that selenite’s neutralization of auranofin is not because of compensation for a chemically induced selenium deficiency. Our results clarify the findings of our original study and may aid drug repurposing efforts in discovering the compound’s true mechanism of action against C. difficile. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10484987/ /pubmed/37679389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36796-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Johnstone, Michael A. Holman, Matthew A. Self, William T. Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile |
title | Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile |
title_full | Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile |
title_fullStr | Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile |
title_full_unstemmed | Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile |
title_short | Inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of Clostridioides difficile |
title_sort | inhibition of selenoprotein synthesis is not the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits growth of clostridioides difficile |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36796-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnstonemichaela inhibitionofselenoproteinsynthesisisnotthemechanismbywhichauranofininhibitsgrowthofclostridioidesdifficile AT holmanmatthewa inhibitionofselenoproteinsynthesisisnotthemechanismbywhichauranofininhibitsgrowthofclostridioidesdifficile AT selfwilliamt inhibitionofselenoproteinsynthesisisnotthemechanismbywhichauranofininhibitsgrowthofclostridioidesdifficile |