Cargando…

Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef

Although food irradiation is deemed safe and endorsed by health-related organizations worldwide, consumers are reluctant to accept the technology. Yet, consumer acceptance is critical as food irradiation has significant potential for increasing the safety and availability of food globally. To commun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parrella, Jean A., Leggette, Holli R., Lu, Peng, Wingenbach, Gary, Baker, Matt, Murano, Elsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685078
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12173146
_version_ 1785103058389172224
author Parrella, Jean A.
Leggette, Holli R.
Lu, Peng
Wingenbach, Gary
Baker, Matt
Murano, Elsa
author_facet Parrella, Jean A.
Leggette, Holli R.
Lu, Peng
Wingenbach, Gary
Baker, Matt
Murano, Elsa
author_sort Parrella, Jean A.
collection PubMed
description Although food irradiation is deemed safe and endorsed by health-related organizations worldwide, consumers are reluctant to accept the technology. Yet, consumer acceptance is critical as food irradiation has significant potential for increasing the safety and availability of food globally. To communicate about food irradiation, science communicators should understand the psychology behind consumers’ decision making related to irradiated foods. Using empirical research, we developed a theoretical model and used structural equation modeling to determine how nine variables affect consumers’ behavioral intentions toward irradiated ground beef. We purchased a national quota sample from Qualtrics and surveyed N = 1102 U.S. consumers. The model explained 60.3% of the variance in consumers’ attitudes toward food irradiation and 55.4% of their behavioral intentions toward irradiated ground beef. Attitude had the largest positive, total effect on consumers’ behavioral intentions, which was followed by subjective social norm and perceived benefit. Perceived risk had the largest negative, total effect on behavioral intentions. Attitude mediated the effect of subjective social norm, perceived benefit, perceived risk, objective knowledge, and food technology neophobia. Environmental concern and health consciousness did not significantly affect behavioral intention. Science communicators should develop messaging strategies that seek to improve consumer acceptance with these factors in mind.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10486656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104866562023-09-09 Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef Parrella, Jean A. Leggette, Holli R. Lu, Peng Wingenbach, Gary Baker, Matt Murano, Elsa Foods Article Although food irradiation is deemed safe and endorsed by health-related organizations worldwide, consumers are reluctant to accept the technology. Yet, consumer acceptance is critical as food irradiation has significant potential for increasing the safety and availability of food globally. To communicate about food irradiation, science communicators should understand the psychology behind consumers’ decision making related to irradiated foods. Using empirical research, we developed a theoretical model and used structural equation modeling to determine how nine variables affect consumers’ behavioral intentions toward irradiated ground beef. We purchased a national quota sample from Qualtrics and surveyed N = 1102 U.S. consumers. The model explained 60.3% of the variance in consumers’ attitudes toward food irradiation and 55.4% of their behavioral intentions toward irradiated ground beef. Attitude had the largest positive, total effect on consumers’ behavioral intentions, which was followed by subjective social norm and perceived benefit. Perceived risk had the largest negative, total effect on behavioral intentions. Attitude mediated the effect of subjective social norm, perceived benefit, perceived risk, objective knowledge, and food technology neophobia. Environmental concern and health consciousness did not significantly affect behavioral intention. Science communicators should develop messaging strategies that seek to improve consumer acceptance with these factors in mind. MDPI 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10486656/ /pubmed/37685078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12173146 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Parrella, Jean A.
Leggette, Holli R.
Lu, Peng
Wingenbach, Gary
Baker, Matt
Murano, Elsa
Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef
title Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef
title_full Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef
title_fullStr Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef
title_short Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef
title_sort evaluating factors explaining u.s. consumers’ behavioral intentions toward irradiated ground beef
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685078
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12173146
work_keys_str_mv AT parrellajeana evaluatingfactorsexplainingusconsumersbehavioralintentionstowardirradiatedgroundbeef
AT leggettehollir evaluatingfactorsexplainingusconsumersbehavioralintentionstowardirradiatedgroundbeef
AT lupeng evaluatingfactorsexplainingusconsumersbehavioralintentionstowardirradiatedgroundbeef
AT wingenbachgary evaluatingfactorsexplainingusconsumersbehavioralintentionstowardirradiatedgroundbeef
AT bakermatt evaluatingfactorsexplainingusconsumersbehavioralintentionstowardirradiatedgroundbeef
AT muranoelsa evaluatingfactorsexplainingusconsumersbehavioralintentionstowardirradiatedgroundbeef