Cargando…
Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
The study examined the effect of reciprocal teaching on students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies, especially among students with learning difficulties. The special focus was to assess how the increase in reading fluency and metacognitive kno...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103 |
_version_ | 1785106274040414208 |
---|---|
author | Juhkam, Maris Jõgi, Anna-Liisa Soodla, Piret Aro, Mikko |
author_facet | Juhkam, Maris Jõgi, Anna-Liisa Soodla, Piret Aro, Mikko |
author_sort | Juhkam, Maris |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study examined the effect of reciprocal teaching on students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies, especially among students with learning difficulties. The special focus was to assess how the increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge during the intervention contributes to the reading comprehension outcome. The sample consisted of 301 Grade 3 students, of whom 77 had learning difficulties. Analyzes of (co)variances were used for estimating the effects of reciprocal teaching on the development of reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge. Multigroup path analysis was used for testing the effect of increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge on reading comprehension. We found reciprocal teaching had a positive effect on reading comprehension, especially for students with learning difficulties. Reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge improved significantly, but similarly in both the intervention and control groups. However, the increase in metacognitive knowledge only contributed to reading comprehension in the intervention group, not in the control group. The study sheds light on the cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms underlying students’ reading comprehension process, emphasizing metacognitive knowledge and especially the systematic practice of reading strategies as key factors in improving reading comprehension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10502224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105022242023-09-16 Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? Juhkam, Maris Jõgi, Anna-Liisa Soodla, Piret Aro, Mikko Front Psychol Psychology The study examined the effect of reciprocal teaching on students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies, especially among students with learning difficulties. The special focus was to assess how the increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge during the intervention contributes to the reading comprehension outcome. The sample consisted of 301 Grade 3 students, of whom 77 had learning difficulties. Analyzes of (co)variances were used for estimating the effects of reciprocal teaching on the development of reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge. Multigroup path analysis was used for testing the effect of increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge on reading comprehension. We found reciprocal teaching had a positive effect on reading comprehension, especially for students with learning difficulties. Reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge improved significantly, but similarly in both the intervention and control groups. However, the increase in metacognitive knowledge only contributed to reading comprehension in the intervention group, not in the control group. The study sheds light on the cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms underlying students’ reading comprehension process, emphasizing metacognitive knowledge and especially the systematic practice of reading strategies as key factors in improving reading comprehension. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10502224/ /pubmed/37720641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103 Text en Copyright © 2023 Juhkam, Jõgi, Soodla and Aro. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Juhkam, Maris Jõgi, Anna-Liisa Soodla, Piret Aro, Mikko Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
title | Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
title_full | Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
title_fullStr | Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
title_short | Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
title_sort | development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juhkammaris developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension AT jogiannaliisa developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension AT soodlapiret developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension AT aromikko developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension |