Cargando…

Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing

Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnelley, Martin, Cmielewski, Patricia, Knight, Emma, Carpentieri, Chantelle, McCarron, Alexandra, Rout-Pitt, Nathan, Parsons, David, Farrow, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3
_version_ 1785107202832334848
author Donnelley, Martin
Cmielewski, Patricia
Knight, Emma
Carpentieri, Chantelle
McCarron, Alexandra
Rout-Pitt, Nathan
Parsons, David
Farrow, Nigel
author_facet Donnelley, Martin
Cmielewski, Patricia
Knight, Emma
Carpentieri, Chantelle
McCarron, Alexandra
Rout-Pitt, Nathan
Parsons, David
Farrow, Nigel
author_sort Donnelley, Martin
collection PubMed
description Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the luciferase reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10506910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105069102023-09-20 Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing Donnelley, Martin Cmielewski, Patricia Knight, Emma Carpentieri, Chantelle McCarron, Alexandra Rout-Pitt, Nathan Parsons, David Farrow, Nigel Gene Ther Article Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the luciferase reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10506910/ /pubmed/37165031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Donnelley, Martin
Cmielewski, Patricia
Knight, Emma
Carpentieri, Chantelle
McCarron, Alexandra
Rout-Pitt, Nathan
Parsons, David
Farrow, Nigel
Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
title Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
title_full Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
title_fullStr Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
title_full_unstemmed Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
title_short Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
title_sort repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? it’s all about the timing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3
work_keys_str_mv AT donnelleymartin repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT cmielewskipatricia repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT knightemma repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT carpentierichantelle repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT mccarronalexandra repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT routpittnathan repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT parsonsdavid repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming
AT farrownigel repeatorsingledoselentiviralvectoradministrationtomouselungsitsallaboutthetiming