Cargando…
Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect
INTRODUCTION: The ability to reason about equations in a robust and fluent way requires both instrumental knowledge of symbolic forms, syntax, and operations, as well as relational knowledge of how such formalisms map to meaningful relationships captured within mental models. A recent systematic rev...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116555 |
_version_ | 1785107743508529152 |
---|---|
author | Benson, Ian Marriott, Nigel McCandliss, Bruce D. |
author_facet | Benson, Ian Marriott, Nigel McCandliss, Bruce D. |
author_sort | Benson, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The ability to reason about equations in a robust and fluent way requires both instrumental knowledge of symbolic forms, syntax, and operations, as well as relational knowledge of how such formalisms map to meaningful relationships captured within mental models. A recent systematic review of studies contrasting the Cuisenaire-Gattegno (Cui) curriculum approach vs. traditional rote schooling on equational reasoning has demonstrated the positive efficacy of pedagogies that focus on integrating these two forms of knowledge. METHODS: Here we seek to replicate and extend the most efficacious of these studies (Brownell) by implementing the curriculum to a high degree of fidelity, as well as capturing longitudinal changes within learners via a novel tablet-based assessment of accuracy and fluency with equational reasoning. We examined arithmetic fluency as a function of relational reasoning to equate initial performance across diverse groups and to track changes over four growth assessment points. RESULTS: Results showed that the intervention condition that stressed relational reasoning leads to advances in fluency for addition and subtraction with small numbers. We also showed that this intervention leads to changes in problem solving dispositions toward complex challenges, wherein students in the CUI intervention were more inclined to solve challenging problems relative to those in the control who gave up significantly earlier on multi-step problems. This shift in disposition was associated with higher accuracy on complex equational reasoning problems. A treatment by aptitude interaction emerged for both arithmetic equation reasoning and complex multi-step equational reasoning problems, both of which showed that the intervention had greatest impact for children with lower initial mathematical aptitude. Two years of intervention contrast revealed a large effect (d = 1) for improvements in equational reasoning for the experimental (CUI) group relative to control. DISCUSSION: The strong replication and extension findings substantiate the importance of embedding these teaching aides within the theory grounded curricula that gave rise to them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10509469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105094692023-09-21 Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect Benson, Ian Marriott, Nigel McCandliss, Bruce D. Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The ability to reason about equations in a robust and fluent way requires both instrumental knowledge of symbolic forms, syntax, and operations, as well as relational knowledge of how such formalisms map to meaningful relationships captured within mental models. A recent systematic review of studies contrasting the Cuisenaire-Gattegno (Cui) curriculum approach vs. traditional rote schooling on equational reasoning has demonstrated the positive efficacy of pedagogies that focus on integrating these two forms of knowledge. METHODS: Here we seek to replicate and extend the most efficacious of these studies (Brownell) by implementing the curriculum to a high degree of fidelity, as well as capturing longitudinal changes within learners via a novel tablet-based assessment of accuracy and fluency with equational reasoning. We examined arithmetic fluency as a function of relational reasoning to equate initial performance across diverse groups and to track changes over four growth assessment points. RESULTS: Results showed that the intervention condition that stressed relational reasoning leads to advances in fluency for addition and subtraction with small numbers. We also showed that this intervention leads to changes in problem solving dispositions toward complex challenges, wherein students in the CUI intervention were more inclined to solve challenging problems relative to those in the control who gave up significantly earlier on multi-step problems. This shift in disposition was associated with higher accuracy on complex equational reasoning problems. A treatment by aptitude interaction emerged for both arithmetic equation reasoning and complex multi-step equational reasoning problems, both of which showed that the intervention had greatest impact for children with lower initial mathematical aptitude. Two years of intervention contrast revealed a large effect (d = 1) for improvements in equational reasoning for the experimental (CUI) group relative to control. DISCUSSION: The strong replication and extension findings substantiate the importance of embedding these teaching aides within the theory grounded curricula that gave rise to them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10509469/ /pubmed/37736155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116555 Text en Copyright © 2023 Benson, Marriott and McCandliss. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Benson, Ian Marriott, Nigel McCandliss, Bruce D. Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect |
title | Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect |
title_full | Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect |
title_fullStr | Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect |
title_short | Interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the Cuisenaire-Gattegno curriculum effect |
title_sort | interventions to improve equational reasoning: replication and extension of the cuisenaire-gattegno curriculum effect |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensonian interventionstoimproveequationalreasoningreplicationandextensionofthecuisenairegattegnocurriculumeffect AT marriottnigel interventionstoimproveequationalreasoningreplicationandextensionofthecuisenairegattegnocurriculumeffect AT mccandlissbruced interventionstoimproveequationalreasoningreplicationandextensionofthecuisenairegattegnocurriculumeffect |