Cargando…
Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
Increased expression of the human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in tumors promotes tumor cell survival and diminishes the survival of patients. Cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) transition mutations (C250T or C228T) in the hTERT promoter create binding sites for transcription factors, which enha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13091308 |
_version_ | 1785110994677137408 |
---|---|
author | Conrad, James W. Sowers, Mark L. Yap, Dianne Y. Cherryhomes, Ellie Pettitt, B. Montgomery Khanipov, Kamil Sowers, Lawrence C. |
author_facet | Conrad, James W. Sowers, Mark L. Yap, Dianne Y. Cherryhomes, Ellie Pettitt, B. Montgomery Khanipov, Kamil Sowers, Lawrence C. |
author_sort | Conrad, James W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increased expression of the human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in tumors promotes tumor cell survival and diminishes the survival of patients. Cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) transition mutations (C250T or C228T) in the hTERT promoter create binding sites for transcription factors, which enhance transcription. The G-rich strand of the hTERT promoter can form G-quadruplex structures, whereas the C-rich strand can form an i-motif in which multiple cytosine residues are protonated. We considered the possibility that i-motif formation might promote cytosine deamination to uracil and C-to-T mutations. We computationally probed the accessibility of cytosine residues in an i-motif to attack by water. We experimentally examined regions of the C-rich strand to form i-motifs using pH-dependent UV and CD spectra. We then incubated the C-rich strand with and without the G-rich complementary strand DNA under various conditions, followed by deep sequencing. Surprisingly, deamination rates did not vary substantially across the 46 cytosines examined, and the two mutation hotspots were not deamination hotspots. The appearance of mutational hotspots in tumors is more likely the result of the selection of sequences with increased promoter binding affinity and hTERT expression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10526324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105263242023-09-28 Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand Conrad, James W. Sowers, Mark L. Yap, Dianne Y. Cherryhomes, Ellie Pettitt, B. Montgomery Khanipov, Kamil Sowers, Lawrence C. Biomolecules Article Increased expression of the human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in tumors promotes tumor cell survival and diminishes the survival of patients. Cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) transition mutations (C250T or C228T) in the hTERT promoter create binding sites for transcription factors, which enhance transcription. The G-rich strand of the hTERT promoter can form G-quadruplex structures, whereas the C-rich strand can form an i-motif in which multiple cytosine residues are protonated. We considered the possibility that i-motif formation might promote cytosine deamination to uracil and C-to-T mutations. We computationally probed the accessibility of cytosine residues in an i-motif to attack by water. We experimentally examined regions of the C-rich strand to form i-motifs using pH-dependent UV and CD spectra. We then incubated the C-rich strand with and without the G-rich complementary strand DNA under various conditions, followed by deep sequencing. Surprisingly, deamination rates did not vary substantially across the 46 cytosines examined, and the two mutation hotspots were not deamination hotspots. The appearance of mutational hotspots in tumors is more likely the result of the selection of sequences with increased promoter binding affinity and hTERT expression. MDPI 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10526324/ /pubmed/37759708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13091308 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Conrad, James W. Sowers, Mark L. Yap, Dianne Y. Cherryhomes, Ellie Pettitt, B. Montgomery Khanipov, Kamil Sowers, Lawrence C. Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand |
title | Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand |
title_full | Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand |
title_fullStr | Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand |
title_full_unstemmed | Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand |
title_short | Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand |
title_sort | transition mutations in the htert promoter are unrelated to potential i-motif formation in the c-rich strand |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13091308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conradjamesw transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand AT sowersmarkl transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand AT yapdianney transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand AT cherryhomesellie transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand AT pettittbmontgomery transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand AT khanipovkamil transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand AT sowerslawrencec transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand |