Cargando…

Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand

Increased expression of the human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in tumors promotes tumor cell survival and diminishes the survival of patients. Cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) transition mutations (C250T or C228T) in the hTERT promoter create binding sites for transcription factors, which enha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, James W., Sowers, Mark L., Yap, Dianne Y., Cherryhomes, Ellie, Pettitt, B. Montgomery, Khanipov, Kamil, Sowers, Lawrence C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13091308
_version_ 1785110994677137408
author Conrad, James W.
Sowers, Mark L.
Yap, Dianne Y.
Cherryhomes, Ellie
Pettitt, B. Montgomery
Khanipov, Kamil
Sowers, Lawrence C.
author_facet Conrad, James W.
Sowers, Mark L.
Yap, Dianne Y.
Cherryhomes, Ellie
Pettitt, B. Montgomery
Khanipov, Kamil
Sowers, Lawrence C.
author_sort Conrad, James W.
collection PubMed
description Increased expression of the human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in tumors promotes tumor cell survival and diminishes the survival of patients. Cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) transition mutations (C250T or C228T) in the hTERT promoter create binding sites for transcription factors, which enhance transcription. The G-rich strand of the hTERT promoter can form G-quadruplex structures, whereas the C-rich strand can form an i-motif in which multiple cytosine residues are protonated. We considered the possibility that i-motif formation might promote cytosine deamination to uracil and C-to-T mutations. We computationally probed the accessibility of cytosine residues in an i-motif to attack by water. We experimentally examined regions of the C-rich strand to form i-motifs using pH-dependent UV and CD spectra. We then incubated the C-rich strand with and without the G-rich complementary strand DNA under various conditions, followed by deep sequencing. Surprisingly, deamination rates did not vary substantially across the 46 cytosines examined, and the two mutation hotspots were not deamination hotspots. The appearance of mutational hotspots in tumors is more likely the result of the selection of sequences with increased promoter binding affinity and hTERT expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10526324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105263242023-09-28 Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand Conrad, James W. Sowers, Mark L. Yap, Dianne Y. Cherryhomes, Ellie Pettitt, B. Montgomery Khanipov, Kamil Sowers, Lawrence C. Biomolecules Article Increased expression of the human telomere reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in tumors promotes tumor cell survival and diminishes the survival of patients. Cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) transition mutations (C250T or C228T) in the hTERT promoter create binding sites for transcription factors, which enhance transcription. The G-rich strand of the hTERT promoter can form G-quadruplex structures, whereas the C-rich strand can form an i-motif in which multiple cytosine residues are protonated. We considered the possibility that i-motif formation might promote cytosine deamination to uracil and C-to-T mutations. We computationally probed the accessibility of cytosine residues in an i-motif to attack by water. We experimentally examined regions of the C-rich strand to form i-motifs using pH-dependent UV and CD spectra. We then incubated the C-rich strand with and without the G-rich complementary strand DNA under various conditions, followed by deep sequencing. Surprisingly, deamination rates did not vary substantially across the 46 cytosines examined, and the two mutation hotspots were not deamination hotspots. The appearance of mutational hotspots in tumors is more likely the result of the selection of sequences with increased promoter binding affinity and hTERT expression. MDPI 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10526324/ /pubmed/37759708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13091308 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Conrad, James W.
Sowers, Mark L.
Yap, Dianne Y.
Cherryhomes, Ellie
Pettitt, B. Montgomery
Khanipov, Kamil
Sowers, Lawrence C.
Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
title Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
title_full Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
title_fullStr Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
title_full_unstemmed Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
title_short Transition Mutations in the hTERT Promoter Are Unrelated to Potential i-motif Formation in the C-Rich Strand
title_sort transition mutations in the htert promoter are unrelated to potential i-motif formation in the c-rich strand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10526324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13091308
work_keys_str_mv AT conradjamesw transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand
AT sowersmarkl transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand
AT yapdianney transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand
AT cherryhomesellie transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand
AT pettittbmontgomery transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand
AT khanipovkamil transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand
AT sowerslawrencec transitionmutationsinthehtertpromoterareunrelatedtopotentialimotifformationinthecrichstrand