Cargando…
Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research
Selective mutism (SM) is an anxiety disorder (prevalence 1–2%), characterized by the consistent absence of speaking in specific situations (e.g., in school), while adequately speaking in other situations (e.g., at home). SM can have a debilitating impact on the psychosocial and academic functioning...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01907-2 |
_version_ | 1785112214232891392 |
---|---|
author | Rodrigues Pereira, Chaya Ensink, Judith B. M. Güldner†, Max G. Lindauer, Ramón J. L. De Jonge, Maretha V. Utens, Elisabeth M. W. J. |
author_facet | Rodrigues Pereira, Chaya Ensink, Judith B. M. Güldner†, Max G. Lindauer, Ramón J. L. De Jonge, Maretha V. Utens, Elisabeth M. W. J. |
author_sort | Rodrigues Pereira, Chaya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective mutism (SM) is an anxiety disorder (prevalence 1–2%), characterized by the consistent absence of speaking in specific situations (e.g., in school), while adequately speaking in other situations (e.g., at home). SM can have a debilitating impact on the psychosocial and academic functioning in childhood. The use of psychometrically sound and cross-culturally valid instruments is urgently needed. The aim of this paper is to identify and review the available assessment instruments for screening or diagnosing the core SM symptomatology. We conducted a systematic search in 6 databases. We identified 1469 studies from the last decade and investigated the measures having been used in a diagnostic assessment of SM. Studies were included if original data on the assessment or treatment of SM were reported. It was found that 38% of published studies on SM reporting original data did not report the use of any standardized or objective measure to investigate the core symptomatology. The results showed that many different questionnaires, interviews and observational instruments were used, many of these only once. The Selective Mutism Questionnaire (SMQ), Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS) and School Speech Questionnaire (SSQ) were used most often. Psychometric data on these instruments are emerging. Beyond these commonly used instruments, more recent developed instruments, such as the Frankfurt Scale of SM (FSSM) and the Teacher Telephone Interview for SM (TTI-SM), are described, as well as several interesting observational measures. The strengths and weaknesses of the instruments are discussed and recommendations are made for their use in clinical practice and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10533577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105335772023-09-29 Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research Rodrigues Pereira, Chaya Ensink, Judith B. M. Güldner†, Max G. Lindauer, Ramón J. L. De Jonge, Maretha V. Utens, Elisabeth M. W. J. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Review Selective mutism (SM) is an anxiety disorder (prevalence 1–2%), characterized by the consistent absence of speaking in specific situations (e.g., in school), while adequately speaking in other situations (e.g., at home). SM can have a debilitating impact on the psychosocial and academic functioning in childhood. The use of psychometrically sound and cross-culturally valid instruments is urgently needed. The aim of this paper is to identify and review the available assessment instruments for screening or diagnosing the core SM symptomatology. We conducted a systematic search in 6 databases. We identified 1469 studies from the last decade and investigated the measures having been used in a diagnostic assessment of SM. Studies were included if original data on the assessment or treatment of SM were reported. It was found that 38% of published studies on SM reporting original data did not report the use of any standardized or objective measure to investigate the core symptomatology. The results showed that many different questionnaires, interviews and observational instruments were used, many of these only once. The Selective Mutism Questionnaire (SMQ), Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS) and School Speech Questionnaire (SSQ) were used most often. Psychometric data on these instruments are emerging. Beyond these commonly used instruments, more recent developed instruments, such as the Frankfurt Scale of SM (FSSM) and the Teacher Telephone Interview for SM (TTI-SM), are described, as well as several interesting observational measures. The strengths and weaknesses of the instruments are discussed and recommendations are made for their use in clinical practice and research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10533577/ /pubmed/34853909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01907-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Rodrigues Pereira, Chaya Ensink, Judith B. M. Güldner†, Max G. Lindauer, Ramón J. L. De Jonge, Maretha V. Utens, Elisabeth M. W. J. Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
title | Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
title_full | Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
title_short | Diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
title_sort | diagnosing selective mutism: a critical review of measures for clinical practice and research |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34853909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01907-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguespereirachaya diagnosingselectivemutismacriticalreviewofmeasuresforclinicalpracticeandresearch AT ensinkjudithbm diagnosingselectivemutismacriticalreviewofmeasuresforclinicalpracticeandresearch AT guldnermaxg diagnosingselectivemutismacriticalreviewofmeasuresforclinicalpracticeandresearch AT lindauerramonjl diagnosingselectivemutismacriticalreviewofmeasuresforclinicalpracticeandresearch AT dejongemarethav diagnosingselectivemutismacriticalreviewofmeasuresforclinicalpracticeandresearch AT utenselisabethmwj diagnosingselectivemutismacriticalreviewofmeasuresforclinicalpracticeandresearch |