Cargando…

The online interactive visual learning improves learning effectiveness and satisfaction of physicians with postgraduate year during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan

BACKGROUNDS: Medical education has shifted from passive forms of teaching to more active learning strategies, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research has discussed the challenges and disadvantages associated with online education, but there is limited documentation on physicians’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Kung-Chen, Huang, Tun-Sung, Lin, Jiunn-Chang, Chiang, Huihua-Kenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04639-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUNDS: Medical education has shifted from passive forms of teaching to more active learning strategies, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research has discussed the challenges and disadvantages associated with online education, but there is limited documentation on physicians’ perceptions of this sudden and unexpected transformation in medical education. This study aimed to determine the effect of online interactive visual learning on physicians’ perceptions of the effectiveness and their satisfaction with this online learning experience. METHODS: We routinely recruited 64 unclassified physicians in the hospital’s postgraduate year (PGY) program between September 2021 and April 2022. PGY physicians received an online interactive visual learning course. Online (Google Form) testing and questionnaires before and after this course evaluated learning performance, learning attitude and satisfaction of these physicians. RESULTS: The interactive online learning tools facilitated the physicians’ active learning processes by reducing their learning burden (burden vs. no burden: 4.69% vs. 68.75%) and increasing their learning interest (interest vs. no interest: 84.38% vs. 3.12%) in the online format. Post-test scores were significantly improved compared with pretest scores (post-test vs. pre-test: 5 vs. 4; p < 0.05) and their imaging recognition was markedly improved from baseline (post-test vs. pre-test: 85.19% vs. 61.11%). Levels of satisfaction correlated positively with the physicians’ learning burden (r(s) = 0.541), learning interest (r(s) = 0.562), and perceived benefits of imaging recognition (post-course: r(s) = 0.508; future: r(s) = 0.563) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our online course with interactive visual learning facilitated PGY physicians’ learning performance, levels of satisfaction, interest, and perceived benefits of online learning. Hospitals and policymakers need to be aware that this learning approach can markedly enhance physicians’ academic outcomes and levels of clinical practice.