Cargando…

Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies

BACKGROUND: The German total diet study (TDS)—BfR MEAL Study—established its food list in 2016 based on food consumption data of children (0.5–<5 years) and adults (14–80 years). The list consists of 356 foods selected for analysis in order to ensure ≥90% coverage of the diet. Recently, new food...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolbaum, Anna Elena, Ptok, Sebastian, Jung, Christian, Libuda, Lars, Lindtner, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00522-4
_version_ 1785113886118117376
author Kolbaum, Anna Elena
Ptok, Sebastian
Jung, Christian
Libuda, Lars
Lindtner, Oliver
author_facet Kolbaum, Anna Elena
Ptok, Sebastian
Jung, Christian
Libuda, Lars
Lindtner, Oliver
author_sort Kolbaum, Anna Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The German total diet study (TDS)—BfR MEAL Study—established its food list in 2016 based on food consumption data of children (0.5–<5 years) and adults (14–80 years). The list consists of 356 foods selected for analysis in order to ensure ≥90% coverage of the diet. Recently, new food consumption data for children (0.5–<6 and 6–<12 years) in Germany became available, which raised the opportunity to evaluate the applicability of the MEAL food list 2016 on new data. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypotheses that the MEAL food list 2016 also covers ≥90% of the diet of the new collected food consumption data, and that the selection of foods from younger children and adults was sufficient to also cover the middle age group (6–<12 years). Strategies for updating the existing food list were assessed. METHODS: Three approaches evaluated the reusability and potential adjustment strategies of the existing food list. Approach 1 applied the existing food list to new food consumption data. Approach 2 allowed the extension of the existing food list to improve coverage of food consumption. Approach 3 set up a new food list based on the new data. RESULTS: The MEAL food list 2016 covered 94% of the overall diet of the new collected food consumption data. The diet of the middle age group was sufficiently covered with 91%. However, coverage on main food group or population subgroup level was <90% in some cases. Approach 3 most accurately identified relevant modifications to the existing food list. 94% of the MEAL food list 2016 could be re-used and 51 new foods were identified as potentially relevant. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that a high investment in the coverage of a TDS food list will lower the effort and the resources to keep data updated in the long-term. IMPACT: There is no established approach to update a TDS food list. This study provides comparative approaches to handle newly collected food consumption data for follow-on TDS activities. The results provide useful information for institutions planning or updating a TDS. Furthermore, new food consumption data for children in Germany recently became available and are here presented for the first time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10541319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105413192023-10-01 Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies Kolbaum, Anna Elena Ptok, Sebastian Jung, Christian Libuda, Lars Lindtner, Oliver J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Article BACKGROUND: The German total diet study (TDS)—BfR MEAL Study—established its food list in 2016 based on food consumption data of children (0.5–<5 years) and adults (14–80 years). The list consists of 356 foods selected for analysis in order to ensure ≥90% coverage of the diet. Recently, new food consumption data for children (0.5–<6 and 6–<12 years) in Germany became available, which raised the opportunity to evaluate the applicability of the MEAL food list 2016 on new data. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypotheses that the MEAL food list 2016 also covers ≥90% of the diet of the new collected food consumption data, and that the selection of foods from younger children and adults was sufficient to also cover the middle age group (6–<12 years). Strategies for updating the existing food list were assessed. METHODS: Three approaches evaluated the reusability and potential adjustment strategies of the existing food list. Approach 1 applied the existing food list to new food consumption data. Approach 2 allowed the extension of the existing food list to improve coverage of food consumption. Approach 3 set up a new food list based on the new data. RESULTS: The MEAL food list 2016 covered 94% of the overall diet of the new collected food consumption data. The diet of the middle age group was sufficiently covered with 91%. However, coverage on main food group or population subgroup level was <90% in some cases. Approach 3 most accurately identified relevant modifications to the existing food list. 94% of the MEAL food list 2016 could be re-used and 51 new foods were identified as potentially relevant. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that a high investment in the coverage of a TDS food list will lower the effort and the resources to keep data updated in the long-term. IMPACT: There is no established approach to update a TDS food list. This study provides comparative approaches to handle newly collected food consumption data for follow-on TDS activities. The results provide useful information for institutions planning or updating a TDS. Furthermore, new food consumption data for children in Germany recently became available and are here presented for the first time. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-02-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10541319/ /pubmed/36725925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00522-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kolbaum, Anna Elena
Ptok, Sebastian
Jung, Christian
Libuda, Lars
Lindtner, Oliver
Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
title Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
title_full Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
title_fullStr Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
title_full_unstemmed Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
title_short Reusability of Germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
title_sort reusability of germany´s total diet study food list upon availability of new food consumption data—comparison of three update strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36725925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00522-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kolbaumannaelena reusabilityofgermanystotaldietstudyfoodlistuponavailabilityofnewfoodconsumptiondatacomparisonofthreeupdatestrategies
AT ptoksebastian reusabilityofgermanystotaldietstudyfoodlistuponavailabilityofnewfoodconsumptiondatacomparisonofthreeupdatestrategies
AT jungchristian reusabilityofgermanystotaldietstudyfoodlistuponavailabilityofnewfoodconsumptiondatacomparisonofthreeupdatestrategies
AT libudalars reusabilityofgermanystotaldietstudyfoodlistuponavailabilityofnewfoodconsumptiondatacomparisonofthreeupdatestrategies
AT lindtneroliver reusabilityofgermanystotaldietstudyfoodlistuponavailabilityofnewfoodconsumptiondatacomparisonofthreeupdatestrategies