Cargando…

Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning

BACKGROUND: As digital learning becomes more prevalent and important in health professions education, learning technologists play increasingly central roles in designing and delivering learning materials. However, little is understood about the process by which learning technologists have integrated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Siew Ping, Jumat, Muhammad Raihan, Cleland, Jennifer Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04728-w
_version_ 1785115347371687936
author Han, Siew Ping
Jumat, Muhammad Raihan
Cleland, Jennifer Anne
author_facet Han, Siew Ping
Jumat, Muhammad Raihan
Cleland, Jennifer Anne
author_sort Han, Siew Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As digital learning becomes more prevalent and important in health professions education, learning technologists play increasingly central roles in designing and delivering learning materials. However, little is understood about the process by which learning technologists have integrated into the existing teaching and learning ecosystem, and it seems that they remain marginal and undervalued. Our aim in this paper was therefore to examine the process of interprofessional co-development of course materials as experienced by educators and learning technologists. METHODS: Our approach was qualitative, using individual semi-structured interviews (conducted between July 2021 to May 2022) to explore the working relationship between faculty and learning technologists. Transcripts were analysed abductively. RESULTS: We found that the attitudes of both faculty and learning technologists towards collaborating to drive digital adoption in health professions education fell into two main themes: “embrace” and “replace” – and “conflict”, which we present as a third theme. Our results revealed that faculty did not take an active and agentic role in developing their digital practices in respect of education delivery. Learning technologists positioned themselves as a resource to support faculty’s knowledge and skill gap in digital competence. There was an obvious power differential between the two groups: learning technologists lacked agency and seemed in the position of servants to faculty masters. This created barriers to effective collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: By examining the process of co-development of course materials by faculty and learning technologists, we open up a space to examine the social, relational and organisational complexities associated with interprofessional collaboration in digital health professions education. Our study also has important implications for guiding educational policy to better position learning technologists to effectively collaborate with faculty and realise the potential of digital health professions education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04728-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10548781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105487812023-10-05 Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning Han, Siew Ping Jumat, Muhammad Raihan Cleland, Jennifer Anne BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: As digital learning becomes more prevalent and important in health professions education, learning technologists play increasingly central roles in designing and delivering learning materials. However, little is understood about the process by which learning technologists have integrated into the existing teaching and learning ecosystem, and it seems that they remain marginal and undervalued. Our aim in this paper was therefore to examine the process of interprofessional co-development of course materials as experienced by educators and learning technologists. METHODS: Our approach was qualitative, using individual semi-structured interviews (conducted between July 2021 to May 2022) to explore the working relationship between faculty and learning technologists. Transcripts were analysed abductively. RESULTS: We found that the attitudes of both faculty and learning technologists towards collaborating to drive digital adoption in health professions education fell into two main themes: “embrace” and “replace” – and “conflict”, which we present as a third theme. Our results revealed that faculty did not take an active and agentic role in developing their digital practices in respect of education delivery. Learning technologists positioned themselves as a resource to support faculty’s knowledge and skill gap in digital competence. There was an obvious power differential between the two groups: learning technologists lacked agency and seemed in the position of servants to faculty masters. This created barriers to effective collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: By examining the process of co-development of course materials by faculty and learning technologists, we open up a space to examine the social, relational and organisational complexities associated with interprofessional collaboration in digital health professions education. Our study also has important implications for guiding educational policy to better position learning technologists to effectively collaborate with faculty and realise the potential of digital health professions education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04728-w. BioMed Central 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10548781/ /pubmed/37794342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04728-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Han, Siew Ping
Jumat, Muhammad Raihan
Cleland, Jennifer Anne
Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
title Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
title_full Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
title_fullStr Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
title_full_unstemmed Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
title_short Interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
title_sort interprofessional collaboration (or lack thereof) between faculty and learning technologists in the creation of digital learning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04728-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hansiewping interprofessionalcollaborationorlackthereofbetweenfacultyandlearningtechnologistsinthecreationofdigitallearning
AT jumatmuhammadraihan interprofessionalcollaborationorlackthereofbetweenfacultyandlearningtechnologistsinthecreationofdigitallearning
AT clelandjenniferanne interprofessionalcollaborationorlackthereofbetweenfacultyandlearningtechnologistsinthecreationofdigitallearning