Cargando…

Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies

Large-scale compound screens are a powerful model system for understanding variability of treatment response and discovering druggable tumor vulnerabilities of hematological malignancies. However, as mostly performed in a monoculture of tumor cells, these assays disregard modulatory effects of the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herbst, Sophie A., Kim, Vladislav, Roider, Tobias, Schitter, Eva C., Bruch, Peter-Martin, Liebers, Nora, Kolb, Carolin, Knoll, Mareike, Lu, Junyan, Dreger, Peter, Müller-Tidow, Carsten, Zenz, Thorsten, Huber, Wolfgang, Dietrich, Sascha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society of Hematology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009652
_version_ 1785117314381774848
author Herbst, Sophie A.
Kim, Vladislav
Roider, Tobias
Schitter, Eva C.
Bruch, Peter-Martin
Liebers, Nora
Kolb, Carolin
Knoll, Mareike
Lu, Junyan
Dreger, Peter
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Zenz, Thorsten
Huber, Wolfgang
Dietrich, Sascha
author_facet Herbst, Sophie A.
Kim, Vladislav
Roider, Tobias
Schitter, Eva C.
Bruch, Peter-Martin
Liebers, Nora
Kolb, Carolin
Knoll, Mareike
Lu, Junyan
Dreger, Peter
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Zenz, Thorsten
Huber, Wolfgang
Dietrich, Sascha
author_sort Herbst, Sophie A.
collection PubMed
description Large-scale compound screens are a powerful model system for understanding variability of treatment response and discovering druggable tumor vulnerabilities of hematological malignancies. However, as mostly performed in a monoculture of tumor cells, these assays disregard modulatory effects of the in vivo microenvironment. It is an open question whether and to what extent coculture with bone marrow stromal cells could improve the biological relevance of drug testing assays over monoculture. Here, we established a high-throughput platform to measure ex vivo sensitivity of 108 primary blood cancer samples to 50 drugs in monoculture and coculture with bone marrow stromal cells. Stromal coculture conferred resistance to 52% of compounds in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 36% of compounds in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including chemotherapeutics, B–cell receptor inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, and Bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitors. Only the JAK inhibitors ruxolitinib and tofacitinib exhibited increased efficacy in AML and CLL stromal coculture. We further confirmed the importance of JAK-STAT signaling for stroma-mediated resistance by showing that stromal cells induce phosphorylation of STAT3 in CLL cells. We genetically characterized the 108 cancer samples and found that drug-gene associations strongly correlated between monoculture and coculture. However, effect sizes were lower in coculture, with more drug-gene associations detected in monoculture than in coculture. Our results justify a 2-step strategy for drug perturbation testing, with large-scale screening performed in monoculture, followed by focused evaluation of potential stroma-mediated resistances in coculture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10558604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The American Society of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105586042023-10-08 Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies Herbst, Sophie A. Kim, Vladislav Roider, Tobias Schitter, Eva C. Bruch, Peter-Martin Liebers, Nora Kolb, Carolin Knoll, Mareike Lu, Junyan Dreger, Peter Müller-Tidow, Carsten Zenz, Thorsten Huber, Wolfgang Dietrich, Sascha Blood Adv Lymphoid Neoplasia Large-scale compound screens are a powerful model system for understanding variability of treatment response and discovering druggable tumor vulnerabilities of hematological malignancies. However, as mostly performed in a monoculture of tumor cells, these assays disregard modulatory effects of the in vivo microenvironment. It is an open question whether and to what extent coculture with bone marrow stromal cells could improve the biological relevance of drug testing assays over monoculture. Here, we established a high-throughput platform to measure ex vivo sensitivity of 108 primary blood cancer samples to 50 drugs in monoculture and coculture with bone marrow stromal cells. Stromal coculture conferred resistance to 52% of compounds in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 36% of compounds in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including chemotherapeutics, B–cell receptor inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, and Bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitors. Only the JAK inhibitors ruxolitinib and tofacitinib exhibited increased efficacy in AML and CLL stromal coculture. We further confirmed the importance of JAK-STAT signaling for stroma-mediated resistance by showing that stromal cells induce phosphorylation of STAT3 in CLL cells. We genetically characterized the 108 cancer samples and found that drug-gene associations strongly correlated between monoculture and coculture. However, effect sizes were lower in coculture, with more drug-gene associations detected in monoculture than in coculture. Our results justify a 2-step strategy for drug perturbation testing, with large-scale screening performed in monoculture, followed by focused evaluation of potential stroma-mediated resistances in coculture. The American Society of Hematology 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10558604/ /pubmed/37352275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009652 Text en © 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Lymphoid Neoplasia
Herbst, Sophie A.
Kim, Vladislav
Roider, Tobias
Schitter, Eva C.
Bruch, Peter-Martin
Liebers, Nora
Kolb, Carolin
Knoll, Mareike
Lu, Junyan
Dreger, Peter
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Zenz, Thorsten
Huber, Wolfgang
Dietrich, Sascha
Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
title Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
title_full Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
title_fullStr Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
title_short Comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
title_sort comparing the value of mono- vs coculture for high-throughput compound screening in hematological malignancies
topic Lymphoid Neoplasia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009652
work_keys_str_mv AT herbstsophiea comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT kimvladislav comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT roidertobias comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT schitterevac comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT bruchpetermartin comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT liebersnora comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT kolbcarolin comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT knollmareike comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT lujunyan comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT dregerpeter comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT mullertidowcarsten comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT zenzthorsten comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT huberwolfgang comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies
AT dietrichsascha comparingthevalueofmonovscocultureforhighthroughputcompoundscreeninginhematologicalmalignancies