Cargando…
A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two of the ICU’s most widely used mortality prediction models are the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We aimed to assess the mortality prediction performance of SAPS-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437221149572 |
_version_ | 1785120243114311680 |
---|---|
author | Koozi, Hazem Lidestam, Adina Lengquist, Maria Johnsson, Patrik Frigyesi, Attila |
author_facet | Koozi, Hazem Lidestam, Adina Lengquist, Maria Johnsson, Patrik Frigyesi, Attila |
author_sort | Koozi, Hazem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sepsis is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two of the ICU’s most widely used mortality prediction models are the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We aimed to assess the mortality prediction performance of SAPS-3 and SOFA upon ICU admission for sepsis and find a simpler mortality prediction model for these patients to be used in clinical practice and when conducting studies. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients fulfilling the Sepsis-3 criteria admitted to four general ICUs was performed. A simple prognostic model was created using backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression. The area under the curve (AUC) of SAPS-3, SOFA and the simple model was assessed. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred eighty four admissions were included. A simple six-parameter model consisting of age, immunosuppression, Glasgow Coma Scale, body temperature, C-reactive protein and bilirubin had an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.75) for 30-day mortality, which was non-inferior to SAPS-3 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72–0.77) (p = 0.071). SOFA had an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.64–0.70) and was inferior to SAPS-3 (p < 0.001) and our simple model (p = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: SAPS-3 has a lower prognostic value in sepsis than in the general ICU population. SOFA performs less well than SAPS-3. Our simple six-parameter model predicts mortality just as well as SAPS-3 upon ICU admission for sepsis, allowing the design of simple studies and performance monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10572475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105724752023-10-14 A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care Koozi, Hazem Lidestam, Adina Lengquist, Maria Johnsson, Patrik Frigyesi, Attila J Intensive Care Soc Original Articles BACKGROUND: Sepsis is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two of the ICU’s most widely used mortality prediction models are the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We aimed to assess the mortality prediction performance of SAPS-3 and SOFA upon ICU admission for sepsis and find a simpler mortality prediction model for these patients to be used in clinical practice and when conducting studies. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients fulfilling the Sepsis-3 criteria admitted to four general ICUs was performed. A simple prognostic model was created using backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression. The area under the curve (AUC) of SAPS-3, SOFA and the simple model was assessed. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred eighty four admissions were included. A simple six-parameter model consisting of age, immunosuppression, Glasgow Coma Scale, body temperature, C-reactive protein and bilirubin had an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.75) for 30-day mortality, which was non-inferior to SAPS-3 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72–0.77) (p = 0.071). SOFA had an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.64–0.70) and was inferior to SAPS-3 (p < 0.001) and our simple model (p = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: SAPS-3 has a lower prognostic value in sepsis than in the general ICU population. SOFA performs less well than SAPS-3. Our simple six-parameter model predicts mortality just as well as SAPS-3 upon ICU admission for sepsis, allowing the design of simple studies and performance monitoring. SAGE Publications 2023-02-01 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10572475/ /pubmed/37841294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437221149572 Text en © The Intensive Care Society 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Koozi, Hazem Lidestam, Adina Lengquist, Maria Johnsson, Patrik Frigyesi, Attila A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
title | A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
title_full | A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
title_fullStr | A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
title_full_unstemmed | A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
title_short | A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
title_sort | simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437221149572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koozihazem asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT lidestamadina asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT lengquistmaria asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT johnssonpatrik asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT frigyesiattila asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT koozihazem simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT lidestamadina simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT lengquistmaria simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT johnssonpatrik simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare AT frigyesiattila simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare |