Cargando…

A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two of the ICU’s most widely used mortality prediction models are the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We aimed to assess the mortality prediction performance of SAPS-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koozi, Hazem, Lidestam, Adina, Lengquist, Maria, Johnsson, Patrik, Frigyesi, Attila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437221149572
_version_ 1785120243114311680
author Koozi, Hazem
Lidestam, Adina
Lengquist, Maria
Johnsson, Patrik
Frigyesi, Attila
author_facet Koozi, Hazem
Lidestam, Adina
Lengquist, Maria
Johnsson, Patrik
Frigyesi, Attila
author_sort Koozi, Hazem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two of the ICU’s most widely used mortality prediction models are the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We aimed to assess the mortality prediction performance of SAPS-3 and SOFA upon ICU admission for sepsis and find a simpler mortality prediction model for these patients to be used in clinical practice and when conducting studies. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients fulfilling the Sepsis-3 criteria admitted to four general ICUs was performed. A simple prognostic model was created using backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression. The area under the curve (AUC) of SAPS-3, SOFA and the simple model was assessed. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred eighty four admissions were included. A simple six-parameter model consisting of age, immunosuppression, Glasgow Coma Scale, body temperature, C-reactive protein and bilirubin had an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.75) for 30-day mortality, which was non-inferior to SAPS-3 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72–0.77) (p = 0.071). SOFA had an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.64–0.70) and was inferior to SAPS-3 (p < 0.001) and our simple model (p = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: SAPS-3 has a lower prognostic value in sepsis than in the general ICU population. SOFA performs less well than SAPS-3. Our simple six-parameter model predicts mortality just as well as SAPS-3 upon ICU admission for sepsis, allowing the design of simple studies and performance monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10572475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105724752023-10-14 A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care Koozi, Hazem Lidestam, Adina Lengquist, Maria Johnsson, Patrik Frigyesi, Attila J Intensive Care Soc Original Articles BACKGROUND: Sepsis is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two of the ICU’s most widely used mortality prediction models are the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We aimed to assess the mortality prediction performance of SAPS-3 and SOFA upon ICU admission for sepsis and find a simpler mortality prediction model for these patients to be used in clinical practice and when conducting studies. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients fulfilling the Sepsis-3 criteria admitted to four general ICUs was performed. A simple prognostic model was created using backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression. The area under the curve (AUC) of SAPS-3, SOFA and the simple model was assessed. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred eighty four admissions were included. A simple six-parameter model consisting of age, immunosuppression, Glasgow Coma Scale, body temperature, C-reactive protein and bilirubin had an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.75) for 30-day mortality, which was non-inferior to SAPS-3 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.72–0.77) (p = 0.071). SOFA had an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.64–0.70) and was inferior to SAPS-3 (p < 0.001) and our simple model (p = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: SAPS-3 has a lower prognostic value in sepsis than in the general ICU population. SOFA performs less well than SAPS-3. Our simple six-parameter model predicts mortality just as well as SAPS-3 upon ICU admission for sepsis, allowing the design of simple studies and performance monitoring. SAGE Publications 2023-02-01 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10572475/ /pubmed/37841294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437221149572 Text en © The Intensive Care Society 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Koozi, Hazem
Lidestam, Adina
Lengquist, Maria
Johnsson, Patrik
Frigyesi, Attila
A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
title A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
title_full A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
title_fullStr A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
title_full_unstemmed A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
title_short A simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
title_sort simple mortality prediction model for sepsis patients in intensive care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17511437221149572
work_keys_str_mv AT koozihazem asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT lidestamadina asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT lengquistmaria asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT johnssonpatrik asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT frigyesiattila asimplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT koozihazem simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT lidestamadina simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT lengquistmaria simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT johnssonpatrik simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare
AT frigyesiattila simplemortalitypredictionmodelforsepsispatientsinintensivecare