Cargando…

Optimized glycemic control of type 2 diabetes with reinforcement learning: a proof-of-concept trial

The personalized titration and optimization of insulin regimens for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) are resource-demanding healthcare tasks. Here we propose a model-based reinforcement learning (RL) framework (called RL-DITR), which learns the optimal insulin regimen by analyzing glycemic state r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Guangyu, Liu, Xiaohong, Ying, Zhen, Yang, Guoxing, Chen, Zhiwei, Liu, Zhiwen, Zhang, Min, Yan, Hongmei, Lu, Yuxing, Gao, Yuanxu, Xue, Kanmin, Li, Xiaoying, Chen, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02552-9
Descripción
Sumario:The personalized titration and optimization of insulin regimens for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) are resource-demanding healthcare tasks. Here we propose a model-based reinforcement learning (RL) framework (called RL-DITR), which learns the optimal insulin regimen by analyzing glycemic state rewards through patient model interactions. When evaluated during the development phase for managing hospitalized patients with T2D, RL-DITR achieved superior insulin titration optimization (mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.10 ± 0.03 U) compared to other deep learning models and standard clinical methods. We performed a stepwise clinical validation of the artificial intelligence system from simulation to deployment, demonstrating better performance in glycemic control in inpatients compared to junior and intermediate-level physicians through quantitative (MAE of 1.18 ± 0.09 U) and qualitative metrics from a blinded review. Additionally, we conducted a single-arm, patient-blinded, proof-of-concept feasibility trial in 16 patients with T2D. The primary outcome was difference in mean daily capillary blood glucose during the trial, which decreased from 11.1 (±3.6) to 8.6 (±2.4) mmol L(−1) (P < 0.01), meeting the pre-specified endpoint. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia with ketosis occurred. These preliminary results warrant further investigation in larger, more diverse clinical studies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05409391.