Reasons for missing evidence in rehabilitation meta-analyses: a cross-sectional meta-research study

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are the best evidence for informing on intervention effectiveness. Their results, however, can be biased due to omitted evidence in the quantitative analyses. We aimed to assess the proportion of randomized controlled trials omitted from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazzarini, Stefano Giuseppe, Stella Yousif, Marzia, Bargeri, Silvia, Castellini, Greta, Gianola, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37865743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02064-7

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37865743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02064-7

Ejemplares similares