Cargando…
Reasons for missing evidence in rehabilitation meta-analyses: a cross-sectional meta-research study
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are the best evidence for informing on intervention effectiveness. Their results, however, can be biased due to omitted evidence in the quantitative analyses. We aimed to assess the proportion of randomized controlled trials omitted from...
Autores principales: | Lazzarini, Stefano Giuseppe, Stella Yousif, Marzia, Bargeri, Silvia, Castellini, Greta, Gianola, Silvia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37865743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02064-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What is the landscape of evidence about the safety of physical agents used in physical medicine and rehabilitation? A scoping review
por: Bargeri, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The Effectiveness of Behavioral Interventions in Adults with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder during Clinical Rehabilitation: A Rapid Review
por: Gimigliano, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Gianola, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted?
por: Gianola, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: the need to present minimal important differences units in meta-analyses
por: Gianola, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)