Cargando…

Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore

BACKGROUND: Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. Multi-level nutrient profiling systems, such as the Choices 5-level criteria, can surmoun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tognon, G, Lee, C, Chan, W K, Ingman, A, Wasserman, M, Hunsberger, M, Lissner, L, Middelham, J, Roodenburg, AJC, Smorenburg, H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595655/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1652
_version_ 1785124919766417408
author Tognon, G
Lee, C
Chan, W K
Ingman, A
Wasserman, M
Hunsberger, M
Lissner, L
Middelham, J
Roodenburg, AJC
Smorenburg, H
author_facet Tognon, G
Lee, C
Chan, W K
Ingman, A
Wasserman, M
Hunsberger, M
Lissner, L
Middelham, J
Roodenburg, AJC
Smorenburg, H
author_sort Tognon, G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. Multi-level nutrient profiling systems, such as the Choices 5-level criteria, can surmount these limitations and support nutrition policies, including the development and enhancement of national front-of-pack labeling systems. Nevertheless, new criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for foods containing non-nutritive sweeteners, must be established. METHODS: This study investigates the comparison of the Choices criteria with the Keyhole logo used in Sweden and the Healthier Choice Symbol employed in Singapore and proposes adaptations to align with food-based dietary guidelines. Additionally, scoping literature reviews on the health effects of non-nutritive sweeteners and international policies guiding their use were conducted. Alignment was evaluated by determining whether foods categorized as healthy by Choices (i.e., classified as level 1 or 2) were also eligible for a national logo in Sweden and Singapore. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that Choices can serve as a foundation for national endorsement of logo criteria. Qualifying criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for non-nutritive sweeteners, were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. KEY MESSAGES: • Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. • The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105956552023-10-25 Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore Tognon, G Lee, C Chan, W K Ingman, A Wasserman, M Hunsberger, M Lissner, L Middelham, J Roodenburg, AJC Smorenburg, H Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. Multi-level nutrient profiling systems, such as the Choices 5-level criteria, can surmount these limitations and support nutrition policies, including the development and enhancement of national front-of-pack labeling systems. Nevertheless, new criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for foods containing non-nutritive sweeteners, must be established. METHODS: This study investigates the comparison of the Choices criteria with the Keyhole logo used in Sweden and the Healthier Choice Symbol employed in Singapore and proposes adaptations to align with food-based dietary guidelines. Additionally, scoping literature reviews on the health effects of non-nutritive sweeteners and international policies guiding their use were conducted. Alignment was evaluated by determining whether foods categorized as healthy by Choices (i.e., classified as level 1 or 2) were also eligible for a national logo in Sweden and Singapore. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that Choices can serve as a foundation for national endorsement of logo criteria. Qualifying criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for non-nutritive sweeteners, were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. KEY MESSAGES: • Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. • The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595655/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1652 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Tognon, G
Lee, C
Chan, W K
Ingman, A
Wasserman, M
Hunsberger, M
Lissner, L
Middelham, J
Roodenburg, AJC
Smorenburg, H
Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
title Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
title_full Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
title_fullStr Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
title_short Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
title_sort comparison of the choices criteria with national logo criteria in sweden and singapore
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595655/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1652
work_keys_str_mv AT tognong comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT leec comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT chanwk comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT ingmana comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT wassermanm comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT hunsbergerm comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT lissnerl comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT middelhamj comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT roodenburgajc comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore
AT smorenburgh comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore