Cargando…
Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore
BACKGROUND: Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. Multi-level nutrient profiling systems, such as the Choices 5-level criteria, can surmoun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595655/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1652 |
_version_ | 1785124919766417408 |
---|---|
author | Tognon, G Lee, C Chan, W K Ingman, A Wasserman, M Hunsberger, M Lissner, L Middelham, J Roodenburg, AJC Smorenburg, H |
author_facet | Tognon, G Lee, C Chan, W K Ingman, A Wasserman, M Hunsberger, M Lissner, L Middelham, J Roodenburg, AJC Smorenburg, H |
author_sort | Tognon, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. Multi-level nutrient profiling systems, such as the Choices 5-level criteria, can surmount these limitations and support nutrition policies, including the development and enhancement of national front-of-pack labeling systems. Nevertheless, new criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for foods containing non-nutritive sweeteners, must be established. METHODS: This study investigates the comparison of the Choices criteria with the Keyhole logo used in Sweden and the Healthier Choice Symbol employed in Singapore and proposes adaptations to align with food-based dietary guidelines. Additionally, scoping literature reviews on the health effects of non-nutritive sweeteners and international policies guiding their use were conducted. Alignment was evaluated by determining whether foods categorized as healthy by Choices (i.e., classified as level 1 or 2) were also eligible for a national logo in Sweden and Singapore. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that Choices can serve as a foundation for national endorsement of logo criteria. Qualifying criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for non-nutritive sweeteners, were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. KEY MESSAGES: • Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. • The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10595655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105956552023-10-25 Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore Tognon, G Lee, C Chan, W K Ingman, A Wasserman, M Hunsberger, M Lissner, L Middelham, J Roodenburg, AJC Smorenburg, H Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. Multi-level nutrient profiling systems, such as the Choices 5-level criteria, can surmount these limitations and support nutrition policies, including the development and enhancement of national front-of-pack labeling systems. Nevertheless, new criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for foods containing non-nutritive sweeteners, must be established. METHODS: This study investigates the comparison of the Choices criteria with the Keyhole logo used in Sweden and the Healthier Choice Symbol employed in Singapore and proposes adaptations to align with food-based dietary guidelines. Additionally, scoping literature reviews on the health effects of non-nutritive sweeteners and international policies guiding their use were conducted. Alignment was evaluated by determining whether foods categorized as healthy by Choices (i.e., classified as level 1 or 2) were also eligible for a national logo in Sweden and Singapore. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that Choices can serve as a foundation for national endorsement of logo criteria. Qualifying criteria for plant-based meat and dairy alternatives, as well as for non-nutritive sweeteners, were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. KEY MESSAGES: • Food-based dietary guidelines often do not consider processed food products and typically do not address the rising popularity of plant-based meat and dairy alternatives or non-nutritive sweeteners. • The Choices 5-level criteria can support stimulating and restrictive nutrition policies and facilitate a desirable transition to a healthier, more plant-based diet. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595655/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1652 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Displays Tognon, G Lee, C Chan, W K Ingman, A Wasserman, M Hunsberger, M Lissner, L Middelham, J Roodenburg, AJC Smorenburg, H Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore |
title | Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore |
title_full | Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore |
title_short | Comparison of the Choices criteria with national logo criteria in Sweden and Singapore |
title_sort | comparison of the choices criteria with national logo criteria in sweden and singapore |
topic | Poster Displays |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595655/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tognong comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT leec comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT chanwk comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT ingmana comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT wassermanm comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT hunsbergerm comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT lissnerl comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT middelhamj comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT roodenburgajc comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore AT smorenburgh comparisonofthechoicescriteriawithnationallogocriteriainswedenandsingapore |