Cargando…
Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography
BACKGROUND: Evidence for policy systems emerging around the world combine the fields of research synthesis, evidence-informed policy and public engagement with research. We conducted this retrospective collective autoethnography to understand the role of academics in developing such systems. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01051-0 |
_version_ | 1785126136240406528 |
---|---|
author | Oliver, Sandy Dickson, Kelly Bangpan, Mukdarut |
author_facet | Oliver, Sandy Dickson, Kelly Bangpan, Mukdarut |
author_sort | Oliver, Sandy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence for policy systems emerging around the world combine the fields of research synthesis, evidence-informed policy and public engagement with research. We conducted this retrospective collective autoethnography to understand the role of academics in developing such systems. METHODS: We constructed a timeline of EPPI Centre work and associated events since 1990. We employed: Transition Theory to reveal emerging and influential innovations; and Transformative Social Innovation theory to track their increasing depth, reach and embeddedness in research and policy organisations. FINDINGS: The EPPI Centre, alongside other small research units, collaborated with national and international organisations at the research-policy interface to incubate, spread and embed new ways of working with evidence and policy. Sustainable change arising from research-policy interactions was less about uptake and embedding of innovations, but more about co-developing and tailoring innovations with organisations to suit their missions and structures for creating new knowledge or using knowledge for decisions. Both spreading and embedding innovation relied on mutual learning that both accommodated and challenged established assumptions and values of collaborating organisations as they adapted to closer ways of working. The incubation, spread and embedding of innovations have been iterative, with new ways of working inspiring further innovation as they spread and embedded. Institutionalising evidence for policy required change in both institutions generating evidence and institutions developing policy. CONCLUSIONS: Key mechanisms for academic contributions to advancing evidence for policy were: contract research focusing attention at the research-policy interface; a willingness to work in unfamiliar fields; inclusive ways of working to move from conflict to consensus; and incentives and opportunities for reflection and consolidating learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10601151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106011512023-10-27 Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography Oliver, Sandy Dickson, Kelly Bangpan, Mukdarut Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Evidence for policy systems emerging around the world combine the fields of research synthesis, evidence-informed policy and public engagement with research. We conducted this retrospective collective autoethnography to understand the role of academics in developing such systems. METHODS: We constructed a timeline of EPPI Centre work and associated events since 1990. We employed: Transition Theory to reveal emerging and influential innovations; and Transformative Social Innovation theory to track their increasing depth, reach and embeddedness in research and policy organisations. FINDINGS: The EPPI Centre, alongside other small research units, collaborated with national and international organisations at the research-policy interface to incubate, spread and embed new ways of working with evidence and policy. Sustainable change arising from research-policy interactions was less about uptake and embedding of innovations, but more about co-developing and tailoring innovations with organisations to suit their missions and structures for creating new knowledge or using knowledge for decisions. Both spreading and embedding innovation relied on mutual learning that both accommodated and challenged established assumptions and values of collaborating organisations as they adapted to closer ways of working. The incubation, spread and embedding of innovations have been iterative, with new ways of working inspiring further innovation as they spread and embedded. Institutionalising evidence for policy required change in both institutions generating evidence and institutions developing policy. CONCLUSIONS: Key mechanisms for academic contributions to advancing evidence for policy were: contract research focusing attention at the research-policy interface; a willingness to work in unfamiliar fields; inclusive ways of working to move from conflict to consensus; and incentives and opportunities for reflection and consolidating learning. BioMed Central 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10601151/ /pubmed/37880785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01051-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Oliver, Sandy Dickson, Kelly Bangpan, Mukdarut Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography |
title | Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography |
title_full | Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography |
title_fullStr | Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography |
title_full_unstemmed | Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography |
title_short | Academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an EPPI Centre collective autoethnography |
title_sort | academic contributions to the development of evidence and policy systems: an eppi centre collective autoethnography |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01051-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliversandy academiccontributionstothedevelopmentofevidenceandpolicysystemsaneppicentrecollectiveautoethnography AT dicksonkelly academiccontributionstothedevelopmentofevidenceandpolicysystemsaneppicentrecollectiveautoethnography AT bangpanmukdarut academiccontributionstothedevelopmentofevidenceandpolicysystemsaneppicentrecollectiveautoethnography |