Cargando…

Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan

OBJECTIVE: In Japan, educational materials on the home care of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were developed owing to limited access to medical care during the pandemic. This study quantitatively evaluated the understandability, actionability, natural flow, and readability of 87 materials publi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furukawa, Emi, Okuhara, Tsuyoshi, Okada, Hiroko, Sawada, Naomi, Kiuchi, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06570-1
_version_ 1785126145770913792
author Furukawa, Emi
Okuhara, Tsuyoshi
Okada, Hiroko
Sawada, Naomi
Kiuchi, Takahiro
author_facet Furukawa, Emi
Okuhara, Tsuyoshi
Okada, Hiroko
Sawada, Naomi
Kiuchi, Takahiro
author_sort Furukawa, Emi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In Japan, educational materials on the home care of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were developed owing to limited access to medical care during the pandemic. This study quantitatively evaluated the understandability, actionability, natural flow, and readability of 87 materials published by local governments in Japan for patients with COVID-19. Their understandability and actionability were rated using the Japanese version of the Patient Education Material Evaluation Tool for Printed Materials (PEMAT-P). Natural flow and readability were rated using Global Quality Score (GQS) and jReadability, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 87 materials, 55 (62.1%) were understandable and 33 (37.9%) were actionable according to the PEMAT-P. Regarding understandability, the materials used medical terms without providing definitions and lacked summaries. Regarding actionability, the materials did not demonstrate explicit steps or utilize visual aids to help the readers take action. The mean (SD) of GQS was 3.44 (0.98), indicating a moderate level of naturalness and comprehensiveness of the materials. The mean (SD) score for readability was 2.4 (0.6), indicating a “lower advanced” level. However, challenges regarding the materials’ plain language remained, such as defining medical terms, summarizing the content for understandability, and using charts and tables that encourage patients to act. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06570-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10601193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106011932023-10-27 Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan Furukawa, Emi Okuhara, Tsuyoshi Okada, Hiroko Sawada, Naomi Kiuchi, Takahiro BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: In Japan, educational materials on the home care of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were developed owing to limited access to medical care during the pandemic. This study quantitatively evaluated the understandability, actionability, natural flow, and readability of 87 materials published by local governments in Japan for patients with COVID-19. Their understandability and actionability were rated using the Japanese version of the Patient Education Material Evaluation Tool for Printed Materials (PEMAT-P). Natural flow and readability were rated using Global Quality Score (GQS) and jReadability, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 87 materials, 55 (62.1%) were understandable and 33 (37.9%) were actionable according to the PEMAT-P. Regarding understandability, the materials used medical terms without providing definitions and lacked summaries. Regarding actionability, the materials did not demonstrate explicit steps or utilize visual aids to help the readers take action. The mean (SD) of GQS was 3.44 (0.98), indicating a moderate level of naturalness and comprehensiveness of the materials. The mean (SD) score for readability was 2.4 (0.6), indicating a “lower advanced” level. However, challenges regarding the materials’ plain language remained, such as defining medical terms, summarizing the content for understandability, and using charts and tables that encourage patients to act. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06570-1. BioMed Central 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10601193/ /pubmed/37880802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06570-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Furukawa, Emi
Okuhara, Tsuyoshi
Okada, Hiroko
Sawada, Naomi
Kiuchi, Takahiro
Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan
title Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan
title_full Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan
title_fullStr Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan
title_short Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan
title_sort evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with covid-19 in japan
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06570-1
work_keys_str_mv AT furukawaemi evaluatingunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlineeducationmaterialsforhomecarepatientswithcovid19injapan
AT okuharatsuyoshi evaluatingunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlineeducationmaterialsforhomecarepatientswithcovid19injapan
AT okadahiroko evaluatingunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlineeducationmaterialsforhomecarepatientswithcovid19injapan
AT sawadanaomi evaluatingunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlineeducationmaterialsforhomecarepatientswithcovid19injapan
AT kiuchitakahiro evaluatingunderstandabilityandactionabilityofonlineeducationmaterialsforhomecarepatientswithcovid19injapan