Cargando…

Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands

This paper proposes novel compliant mechanisms for constructing hand prostheses based on soft robotics. Two models of prosthetic hands are developed in this work. Three mechanical evaluations are performed to determine the suitability of the two designs for carrying out activities of daily living (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramos, Orion, de Arco, Laura, Cifuentes, Carlos A., Moazen, Mehran, Wurdemann, Helge, Múnera, Marcela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.985901
_version_ 1785126482871320576
author Ramos, Orion
de Arco, Laura
Cifuentes, Carlos A.
Moazen, Mehran
Wurdemann, Helge
Múnera, Marcela
author_facet Ramos, Orion
de Arco, Laura
Cifuentes, Carlos A.
Moazen, Mehran
Wurdemann, Helge
Múnera, Marcela
author_sort Ramos, Orion
collection PubMed
description This paper proposes novel compliant mechanisms for constructing hand prostheses based on soft robotics. Two models of prosthetic hands are developed in this work. Three mechanical evaluations are performed to determine the suitability of the two designs for carrying out activities of daily living (ADLs). The first test measures the grip force that the prosthesis can generate on objects. The second determines the energy required and dissipated from the prosthesis to operate. The third test identifies the maximum traction force that the prosthesis can support. The tests showed that the PrHand1 prosthesis has a maximum grip force of 23.38 ± 1.5 N, the required energy is 0.76 ± 0.13 J, and the dissipated energy is 0.21 ± 0.17 J. It supports a traction force of 173.31 ± 5.7 N. The PrHand2 prosthesis has a maximum grip force of 36.13 ± 2.3 N, the required energy is 1.28 ± 0.13 J, the dissipated energy is 0.96 ± 0.12 J, and it supports a traction force of 78.48 ± 0 N. In conclusion, the PrHand1 prosthesis has a better performance in terms of energy and tensile force supported. The difference between the energy and traction force results is related to two design features of the PrHand2: fully silicone-coated fingers and a unifying mechanism that requires more force on the tendons to close the prosthesis. The grip force of the PrHand2 prosthesis was more robust than the PrHand1 due to its silicone coating, which allowed for an improved grip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106028922023-10-28 Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands Ramos, Orion de Arco, Laura Cifuentes, Carlos A. Moazen, Mehran Wurdemann, Helge Múnera, Marcela Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology This paper proposes novel compliant mechanisms for constructing hand prostheses based on soft robotics. Two models of prosthetic hands are developed in this work. Three mechanical evaluations are performed to determine the suitability of the two designs for carrying out activities of daily living (ADLs). The first test measures the grip force that the prosthesis can generate on objects. The second determines the energy required and dissipated from the prosthesis to operate. The third test identifies the maximum traction force that the prosthesis can support. The tests showed that the PrHand1 prosthesis has a maximum grip force of 23.38 ± 1.5 N, the required energy is 0.76 ± 0.13 J, and the dissipated energy is 0.21 ± 0.17 J. It supports a traction force of 173.31 ± 5.7 N. The PrHand2 prosthesis has a maximum grip force of 36.13 ± 2.3 N, the required energy is 1.28 ± 0.13 J, the dissipated energy is 0.96 ± 0.12 J, and it supports a traction force of 78.48 ± 0 N. In conclusion, the PrHand1 prosthesis has a better performance in terms of energy and tensile force supported. The difference between the energy and traction force results is related to two design features of the PrHand2: fully silicone-coated fingers and a unifying mechanism that requires more force on the tendons to close the prosthesis. The grip force of the PrHand2 prosthesis was more robust than the PrHand1 due to its silicone coating, which allowed for an improved grip. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10602892/ /pubmed/37901838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.985901 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ramos, de Arco, Cifuentes, Moazen, Wurdemann and Múnera. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Ramos, Orion
de Arco, Laura
Cifuentes, Carlos A.
Moazen, Mehran
Wurdemann, Helge
Múnera, Marcela
Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
title Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
title_full Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
title_fullStr Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
title_short Mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
title_sort mechanical assessment of novel compliant mechanisms for underactuated prosthetic hands
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.985901
work_keys_str_mv AT ramosorion mechanicalassessmentofnovelcompliantmechanismsforunderactuatedprosthetichands
AT dearcolaura mechanicalassessmentofnovelcompliantmechanismsforunderactuatedprosthetichands
AT cifuentescarlosa mechanicalassessmentofnovelcompliantmechanismsforunderactuatedprosthetichands
AT moazenmehran mechanicalassessmentofnovelcompliantmechanismsforunderactuatedprosthetichands
AT wurdemannhelge mechanicalassessmentofnovelcompliantmechanismsforunderactuatedprosthetichands
AT muneramarcela mechanicalassessmentofnovelcompliantmechanismsforunderactuatedprosthetichands