Cargando…
Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods
Adulteration of higher priced milks with cheaper ones to obtain extra profit can adversely affect consumer health and the market. In this study, pure buffalo milk (BM), goat milk (GM), camel milk (CM), and their mixtures with 5–50% (vol/vol) cow milk or water were used. Mid-infrared spectroscopy (MI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12203856 |
_version_ | 1785127232004423680 |
---|---|
author | Chu, Chu Wang, Haitong Luo, Xuelu Wen, Peipei Nan, Liangkang Du, Chao Fan, Yikai Gao, Dengying Wang, Dongwei Yang, Zhuo Yang, Guochang Liu, Li Li, Yongqing Hu, Bo Abula, Zunongjiang Zhang, Shujun |
author_facet | Chu, Chu Wang, Haitong Luo, Xuelu Wen, Peipei Nan, Liangkang Du, Chao Fan, Yikai Gao, Dengying Wang, Dongwei Yang, Zhuo Yang, Guochang Liu, Li Li, Yongqing Hu, Bo Abula, Zunongjiang Zhang, Shujun |
author_sort | Chu, Chu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adulteration of higher priced milks with cheaper ones to obtain extra profit can adversely affect consumer health and the market. In this study, pure buffalo milk (BM), goat milk (GM), camel milk (CM), and their mixtures with 5–50% (vol/vol) cow milk or water were used. Mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) combined with modern statistical machine learning was used for the discrimination and quantification of cow milk or water adulteration in BM, GM, and CM. Compared to partial least squares (PLS), modern statistical machine learning—especially support vector machines (SVM), projection pursuit regression (PPR), and Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN)—exhibited superior performance for the detection of adulteration. The best prediction models for the different predictive traits are as follows: The binary classification models developed by SVM resulted in differentiation of CM-cow milk, and GM/CM-water mixtures. PLS resulted in differentiation of BM/GM-cow milk and BM-water mixtures. All of the above models have 100% classification accuracy. SVM was used to develop multi-classification models for identifying the high and low proportions of cow milk in BM, GM, and CM, as well as the high and low proportions of water adulteration in BM and GM, with correct classification rates of 94%, 100%, 100%, 99%, and 100%, respectively. In addition, a PLS-based model was developed for identifying the high and low proportions of water adulteration in CM, with correct classification rates of 100%. A regression model for quantifying cow milk in BM was developed using PCA + BRNN, with RMSEV = 5.42%, and R(V)(2) = 0.88. A regression model for quantifying water adulteration in BM was developed using PCA + PPR, with RMSEV = 1.70%, and R(V)(2) = 0.99. Modern statistical machine learning improved the accuracy of MIRS in predicting BM, GM, and CM adulteration more effectively than PLS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10606090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106060902023-10-28 Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods Chu, Chu Wang, Haitong Luo, Xuelu Wen, Peipei Nan, Liangkang Du, Chao Fan, Yikai Gao, Dengying Wang, Dongwei Yang, Zhuo Yang, Guochang Liu, Li Li, Yongqing Hu, Bo Abula, Zunongjiang Zhang, Shujun Foods Article Adulteration of higher priced milks with cheaper ones to obtain extra profit can adversely affect consumer health and the market. In this study, pure buffalo milk (BM), goat milk (GM), camel milk (CM), and their mixtures with 5–50% (vol/vol) cow milk or water were used. Mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) combined with modern statistical machine learning was used for the discrimination and quantification of cow milk or water adulteration in BM, GM, and CM. Compared to partial least squares (PLS), modern statistical machine learning—especially support vector machines (SVM), projection pursuit regression (PPR), and Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN)—exhibited superior performance for the detection of adulteration. The best prediction models for the different predictive traits are as follows: The binary classification models developed by SVM resulted in differentiation of CM-cow milk, and GM/CM-water mixtures. PLS resulted in differentiation of BM/GM-cow milk and BM-water mixtures. All of the above models have 100% classification accuracy. SVM was used to develop multi-classification models for identifying the high and low proportions of cow milk in BM, GM, and CM, as well as the high and low proportions of water adulteration in BM and GM, with correct classification rates of 94%, 100%, 100%, 99%, and 100%, respectively. In addition, a PLS-based model was developed for identifying the high and low proportions of water adulteration in CM, with correct classification rates of 100%. A regression model for quantifying cow milk in BM was developed using PCA + BRNN, with RMSEV = 5.42%, and R(V)(2) = 0.88. A regression model for quantifying water adulteration in BM was developed using PCA + PPR, with RMSEV = 1.70%, and R(V)(2) = 0.99. Modern statistical machine learning improved the accuracy of MIRS in predicting BM, GM, and CM adulteration more effectively than PLS. MDPI 2023-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10606090/ /pubmed/37893749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12203856 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chu, Chu Wang, Haitong Luo, Xuelu Wen, Peipei Nan, Liangkang Du, Chao Fan, Yikai Gao, Dengying Wang, Dongwei Yang, Zhuo Yang, Guochang Liu, Li Li, Yongqing Hu, Bo Abula, Zunongjiang Zhang, Shujun Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods |
title | Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods |
title_full | Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods |
title_fullStr | Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods |
title_short | Possible Alternatives: Identifying and Quantifying Adulteration in Buffalo, Goat, and Camel Milk Using Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Modern Statistical Machine Learning Methods |
title_sort | possible alternatives: identifying and quantifying adulteration in buffalo, goat, and camel milk using mid-infrared spectroscopy combined with modern statistical machine learning methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12203856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chuchu possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT wanghaitong possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT luoxuelu possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT wenpeipei possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT nanliangkang possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT duchao possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT fanyikai possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT gaodengying possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT wangdongwei possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT yangzhuo possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT yangguochang possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT liuli possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT liyongqing possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT hubo possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT abulazunongjiang possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods AT zhangshujun possiblealternativesidentifyingandquantifyingadulterationinbuffalogoatandcamelmilkusingmidinfraredspectroscopycombinedwithmodernstatisticalmachinelearningmethods |