Cargando…

Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data

When data is derived under a single or multiple lower limits of quantification (LLOQ), estimation of distribution parameters as well as precision of these estimates appear to be challenging, as the way to account for unquantifiable observations due to LLOQs needs particular attention. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bülow, Tanja, Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter, Heussen, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293640
_version_ 1785130441543516160
author Bülow, Tanja
Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
Heussen, Nicole
author_facet Bülow, Tanja
Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
Heussen, Nicole
author_sort Bülow, Tanja
collection PubMed
description When data is derived under a single or multiple lower limits of quantification (LLOQ), estimation of distribution parameters as well as precision of these estimates appear to be challenging, as the way to account for unquantifiable observations due to LLOQs needs particular attention. The aim of this investigation is to characterize the precision of censored sample maximum likelihood estimates of the mean for normal, exponential and Poisson distribution affected by one or two LLOQs using confidence intervals (CI). In a simulation study, asymptotic and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap CIs for the location parameter mean are compared with respect to coverage proportion and interval width. To enable this examination, we derived analytical expressions of the maximum likelihood location parameter estimate for the assumption of exponentially and Poisson distributed data, where the censored sample method and simple imputation method are used to account for LLOQs. Additionally, we vary the proportion of observations below the LLOQs. When based on the censored sample estimate, the bootstrap CI led to higher coverage proportions and narrower interval width than the asymptotic CI. The results differed by underlying distribution. Under the assumption of normality, the CI’s coverage proportion and width suffered most from high proportions of unquantifiable observations. For exponentially and Poisson distributed data, both CI approaches delivered similar results. To derive the CIs, the point estimates from the censored sample method are preferable, because the point estimate of the simple imputation method leads to higher bias for all investigated distributions. This biased simple imputation estimate impairs the coverage proportion of the respective CI. The bootstrap CI surpassed the asymptotic CIs with respect to coverage proportion for the investigated choice of distributional assumptions. The variety of distributions for which the methods are suitable gives the applicant a widely usable tool to handle LLOQ affected data with appropriate approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10621850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106218502023-11-03 Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data Bülow, Tanja Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole PLoS One Research Article When data is derived under a single or multiple lower limits of quantification (LLOQ), estimation of distribution parameters as well as precision of these estimates appear to be challenging, as the way to account for unquantifiable observations due to LLOQs needs particular attention. The aim of this investigation is to characterize the precision of censored sample maximum likelihood estimates of the mean for normal, exponential and Poisson distribution affected by one or two LLOQs using confidence intervals (CI). In a simulation study, asymptotic and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap CIs for the location parameter mean are compared with respect to coverage proportion and interval width. To enable this examination, we derived analytical expressions of the maximum likelihood location parameter estimate for the assumption of exponentially and Poisson distributed data, where the censored sample method and simple imputation method are used to account for LLOQs. Additionally, we vary the proportion of observations below the LLOQs. When based on the censored sample estimate, the bootstrap CI led to higher coverage proportions and narrower interval width than the asymptotic CI. The results differed by underlying distribution. Under the assumption of normality, the CI’s coverage proportion and width suffered most from high proportions of unquantifiable observations. For exponentially and Poisson distributed data, both CI approaches delivered similar results. To derive the CIs, the point estimates from the censored sample method are preferable, because the point estimate of the simple imputation method leads to higher bias for all investigated distributions. This biased simple imputation estimate impairs the coverage proportion of the respective CI. The bootstrap CI surpassed the asymptotic CIs with respect to coverage proportion for the investigated choice of distributional assumptions. The variety of distributions for which the methods are suitable gives the applicant a widely usable tool to handle LLOQ affected data with appropriate approaches. Public Library of Science 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10621850/ /pubmed/37917602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293640 Text en © 2023 Bülow et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bülow, Tanja
Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter
Heussen, Nicole
Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
title Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
title_full Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
title_fullStr Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
title_full_unstemmed Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
title_short Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
title_sort confidence interval comparison: precision of maximum likelihood estimates in lloq affected data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293640
work_keys_str_mv AT bulowtanja confidenceintervalcomparisonprecisionofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesinlloqaffecteddata
AT hilgersralfdieter confidenceintervalcomparisonprecisionofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesinlloqaffecteddata
AT heussennicole confidenceintervalcomparisonprecisionofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesinlloqaffecteddata