Cargando…
Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data
When data is derived under a single or multiple lower limits of quantification (LLOQ), estimation of distribution parameters as well as precision of these estimates appear to be challenging, as the way to account for unquantifiable observations due to LLOQs needs particular attention. The aim of thi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293640 |
_version_ | 1785130441543516160 |
---|---|
author | Bülow, Tanja Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole |
author_facet | Bülow, Tanja Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole |
author_sort | Bülow, Tanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | When data is derived under a single or multiple lower limits of quantification (LLOQ), estimation of distribution parameters as well as precision of these estimates appear to be challenging, as the way to account for unquantifiable observations due to LLOQs needs particular attention. The aim of this investigation is to characterize the precision of censored sample maximum likelihood estimates of the mean for normal, exponential and Poisson distribution affected by one or two LLOQs using confidence intervals (CI). In a simulation study, asymptotic and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap CIs for the location parameter mean are compared with respect to coverage proportion and interval width. To enable this examination, we derived analytical expressions of the maximum likelihood location parameter estimate for the assumption of exponentially and Poisson distributed data, where the censored sample method and simple imputation method are used to account for LLOQs. Additionally, we vary the proportion of observations below the LLOQs. When based on the censored sample estimate, the bootstrap CI led to higher coverage proportions and narrower interval width than the asymptotic CI. The results differed by underlying distribution. Under the assumption of normality, the CI’s coverage proportion and width suffered most from high proportions of unquantifiable observations. For exponentially and Poisson distributed data, both CI approaches delivered similar results. To derive the CIs, the point estimates from the censored sample method are preferable, because the point estimate of the simple imputation method leads to higher bias for all investigated distributions. This biased simple imputation estimate impairs the coverage proportion of the respective CI. The bootstrap CI surpassed the asymptotic CIs with respect to coverage proportion for the investigated choice of distributional assumptions. The variety of distributions for which the methods are suitable gives the applicant a widely usable tool to handle LLOQ affected data with appropriate approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10621850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106218502023-11-03 Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data Bülow, Tanja Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole PLoS One Research Article When data is derived under a single or multiple lower limits of quantification (LLOQ), estimation of distribution parameters as well as precision of these estimates appear to be challenging, as the way to account for unquantifiable observations due to LLOQs needs particular attention. The aim of this investigation is to characterize the precision of censored sample maximum likelihood estimates of the mean for normal, exponential and Poisson distribution affected by one or two LLOQs using confidence intervals (CI). In a simulation study, asymptotic and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap CIs for the location parameter mean are compared with respect to coverage proportion and interval width. To enable this examination, we derived analytical expressions of the maximum likelihood location parameter estimate for the assumption of exponentially and Poisson distributed data, where the censored sample method and simple imputation method are used to account for LLOQs. Additionally, we vary the proportion of observations below the LLOQs. When based on the censored sample estimate, the bootstrap CI led to higher coverage proportions and narrower interval width than the asymptotic CI. The results differed by underlying distribution. Under the assumption of normality, the CI’s coverage proportion and width suffered most from high proportions of unquantifiable observations. For exponentially and Poisson distributed data, both CI approaches delivered similar results. To derive the CIs, the point estimates from the censored sample method are preferable, because the point estimate of the simple imputation method leads to higher bias for all investigated distributions. This biased simple imputation estimate impairs the coverage proportion of the respective CI. The bootstrap CI surpassed the asymptotic CIs with respect to coverage proportion for the investigated choice of distributional assumptions. The variety of distributions for which the methods are suitable gives the applicant a widely usable tool to handle LLOQ affected data with appropriate approaches. Public Library of Science 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10621850/ /pubmed/37917602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293640 Text en © 2023 Bülow et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bülow, Tanja Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter Heussen, Nicole Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data |
title | Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data |
title_full | Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data |
title_fullStr | Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data |
title_full_unstemmed | Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data |
title_short | Confidence interval comparison: Precision of maximum likelihood estimates in LLOQ affected data |
title_sort | confidence interval comparison: precision of maximum likelihood estimates in lloq affected data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bulowtanja confidenceintervalcomparisonprecisionofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesinlloqaffecteddata AT hilgersralfdieter confidenceintervalcomparisonprecisionofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesinlloqaffecteddata AT heussennicole confidenceintervalcomparisonprecisionofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesinlloqaffecteddata |