Cargando…

Development and validation of Digi-MEE Instrument measuring online learning environments in medical education

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate Digital Medical Education Environment (Digi-MEE) Instrument for measuring online learning environment in medical education. METHODS: This series of studies involved 696 participants from May 2022 to December 2022. Following scoping review, invited modified e-Delph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naeem, Noor-i-Kiran, Hadie, Siti Nurma Hanim, Ismail, Irwan Mahazir, Yusoff, Muhamad Saiful Bahri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936768
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.6.8430
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate Digital Medical Education Environment (Digi-MEE) Instrument for measuring online learning environment in medical education. METHODS: This series of studies involved 696 participants from May 2022 to December 2022. Following scoping review, invited modified e-Delphi experts developed consensus on the components and related items for measuring online learning environments. A panel of content experts and a group of medical students carried out content and response-process validation to determine Content Validity Index (CVI) and Face Validity Index (FVI) respectively. This was followed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis to determine Digi-MEE’s factorial structure and internal consistency using SPSS version 26.0 and AMOS 26.0. RESULTS: Delphi experts agreed upon nine components with 73 items of initial Digi-MEE version. CVI of Digi-MEE 2.0 was more than 0.90. with FVI of Digi-MEE 3.0 of 0.87. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 46 items with 57.18% variance. Confirmatory factor analysis led to the final Digi-MEE version containing 28 items within nine components with acceptable levels of goodness of fit indices. Overall Cronbach alpha of the final Digi-MEE was more than 0.90, and for the nine components ranged between 0.62 and 0.76. CONCLUSION: Digi-MEE is a promising valid and reliable instrument to evaluate online education environment in medical education. Content, response-process, factorial structure, and internal consistency evidence support the validity of Digi-MEE. Medical schools can use Digi-MEE as an evaluation tool for the continuous quality improvement of online learning environments.