Cargando…
Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
Millipedes are key players in recycling leaf litter into soil in tropical ecosystems. To elucidate their gut microbiota, we collected millipedes from different municipalities of Puerto Rico. Here we aim to benchmark which method is best for metagenomic skimming of this highly complex millipede micro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Biological Methods
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937256 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2023.376 |
_version_ | 1785131466438475776 |
---|---|
author | Geli-Cruz, Orlando J. Santos-Flores, Carlos J. Cafaro, Matias J. Ropelewski, Alex Van Dam, Alex R. |
author_facet | Geli-Cruz, Orlando J. Santos-Flores, Carlos J. Cafaro, Matias J. Ropelewski, Alex Van Dam, Alex R. |
author_sort | Geli-Cruz, Orlando J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Millipedes are key players in recycling leaf litter into soil in tropical ecosystems. To elucidate their gut microbiota, we collected millipedes from different municipalities of Puerto Rico. Here we aim to benchmark which method is best for metagenomic skimming of this highly complex millipede microbiome. We sequenced the gut DNA with Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ (ONT) MinION sequencer, then analyzed the data using MEGAN-LR, Kraken2 protein mode, Kraken2 nucleotide mode, GraphMap, and Minimap2 to classify these long ONT reads. From our two samples, we obtained a total of 87,110 and 99,749 ONT reads, respectively. Kraken2 nucleotide mode classified the most reads compared to all other methods at the phylum and class taxonomic level, classifying 75% of the reads in the two samples, the other methods failed to assign enough reads to either phylum or class to yield asymptotes in the taxa rarefaction curves indicating that they required more sequencing depth to fully classify this community. The community is hyper diverse with all methods classifying 20–50 phyla in the two samples. There was significant overlap in the reads used and phyla classified between the five methods benchmarked. Our results suggest that Kraken2 nucleotide mode is the most appropriate tool for the application of metagenomic skimming of this highly complex community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10627078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Journal of Biological Methods |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106270782023-11-07 Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology Geli-Cruz, Orlando J. Santos-Flores, Carlos J. Cafaro, Matias J. Ropelewski, Alex Van Dam, Alex R. J Biol Methods Benchmarks Millipedes are key players in recycling leaf litter into soil in tropical ecosystems. To elucidate their gut microbiota, we collected millipedes from different municipalities of Puerto Rico. Here we aim to benchmark which method is best for metagenomic skimming of this highly complex millipede microbiome. We sequenced the gut DNA with Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ (ONT) MinION sequencer, then analyzed the data using MEGAN-LR, Kraken2 protein mode, Kraken2 nucleotide mode, GraphMap, and Minimap2 to classify these long ONT reads. From our two samples, we obtained a total of 87,110 and 99,749 ONT reads, respectively. Kraken2 nucleotide mode classified the most reads compared to all other methods at the phylum and class taxonomic level, classifying 75% of the reads in the two samples, the other methods failed to assign enough reads to either phylum or class to yield asymptotes in the taxa rarefaction curves indicating that they required more sequencing depth to fully classify this community. The community is hyper diverse with all methods classifying 20–50 phyla in the two samples. There was significant overlap in the reads used and phyla classified between the five methods benchmarked. Our results suggest that Kraken2 nucleotide mode is the most appropriate tool for the application of metagenomic skimming of this highly complex community. Journal of Biological Methods 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10627078/ /pubmed/37937256 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2023.376 Text en © 2013-2023 The Journal of Biological Methods, All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Benchmarks Geli-Cruz, Orlando J. Santos-Flores, Carlos J. Cafaro, Matias J. Ropelewski, Alex Van Dam, Alex R. Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology |
title | Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology |
title_full | Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology |
title_short | Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology |
title_sort | benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via oxford nanopore sequencing technology |
topic | Benchmarks |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937256 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2023.376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gelicruzorlandoj benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology AT santosflorescarlosj benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology AT cafaromatiasj benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology AT ropelewskialex benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology AT vandamalexr benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology |