Cargando…

Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology

Millipedes are key players in recycling leaf litter into soil in tropical ecosystems. To elucidate their gut microbiota, we collected millipedes from different municipalities of Puerto Rico. Here we aim to benchmark which method is best for metagenomic skimming of this highly complex millipede micro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geli-Cruz, Orlando J., Santos-Flores, Carlos J., Cafaro, Matias J., Ropelewski, Alex, Van Dam, Alex R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Biological Methods 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937256
http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2023.376
_version_ 1785131466438475776
author Geli-Cruz, Orlando J.
Santos-Flores, Carlos J.
Cafaro, Matias J.
Ropelewski, Alex
Van Dam, Alex R.
author_facet Geli-Cruz, Orlando J.
Santos-Flores, Carlos J.
Cafaro, Matias J.
Ropelewski, Alex
Van Dam, Alex R.
author_sort Geli-Cruz, Orlando J.
collection PubMed
description Millipedes are key players in recycling leaf litter into soil in tropical ecosystems. To elucidate their gut microbiota, we collected millipedes from different municipalities of Puerto Rico. Here we aim to benchmark which method is best for metagenomic skimming of this highly complex millipede microbiome. We sequenced the gut DNA with Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ (ONT) MinION sequencer, then analyzed the data using MEGAN-LR, Kraken2 protein mode, Kraken2 nucleotide mode, GraphMap, and Minimap2 to classify these long ONT reads. From our two samples, we obtained a total of 87,110 and 99,749 ONT reads, respectively. Kraken2 nucleotide mode classified the most reads compared to all other methods at the phylum and class taxonomic level, classifying 75% of the reads in the two samples, the other methods failed to assign enough reads to either phylum or class to yield asymptotes in the taxa rarefaction curves indicating that they required more sequencing depth to fully classify this community. The community is hyper diverse with all methods classifying 20–50 phyla in the two samples. There was significant overlap in the reads used and phyla classified between the five methods benchmarked. Our results suggest that Kraken2 nucleotide mode is the most appropriate tool for the application of metagenomic skimming of this highly complex community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10627078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Journal of Biological Methods
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106270782023-11-07 Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology Geli-Cruz, Orlando J. Santos-Flores, Carlos J. Cafaro, Matias J. Ropelewski, Alex Van Dam, Alex R. J Biol Methods Benchmarks Millipedes are key players in recycling leaf litter into soil in tropical ecosystems. To elucidate their gut microbiota, we collected millipedes from different municipalities of Puerto Rico. Here we aim to benchmark which method is best for metagenomic skimming of this highly complex millipede microbiome. We sequenced the gut DNA with Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ (ONT) MinION sequencer, then analyzed the data using MEGAN-LR, Kraken2 protein mode, Kraken2 nucleotide mode, GraphMap, and Minimap2 to classify these long ONT reads. From our two samples, we obtained a total of 87,110 and 99,749 ONT reads, respectively. Kraken2 nucleotide mode classified the most reads compared to all other methods at the phylum and class taxonomic level, classifying 75% of the reads in the two samples, the other methods failed to assign enough reads to either phylum or class to yield asymptotes in the taxa rarefaction curves indicating that they required more sequencing depth to fully classify this community. The community is hyper diverse with all methods classifying 20–50 phyla in the two samples. There was significant overlap in the reads used and phyla classified between the five methods benchmarked. Our results suggest that Kraken2 nucleotide mode is the most appropriate tool for the application of metagenomic skimming of this highly complex community. Journal of Biological Methods 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10627078/ /pubmed/37937256 http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2023.376 Text en © 2013-2023 The Journal of Biological Methods, All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle Benchmarks
Geli-Cruz, Orlando J.
Santos-Flores, Carlos J.
Cafaro, Matias J.
Ropelewski, Alex
Van Dam, Alex R.
Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
title Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
title_full Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
title_fullStr Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
title_short Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology
title_sort benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via oxford nanopore sequencing technology
topic Benchmarks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937256
http://dx.doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2023.376
work_keys_str_mv AT gelicruzorlandoj benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology
AT santosflorescarlosj benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology
AT cafaromatiasj benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology
AT ropelewskialex benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology
AT vandamalexr benchmarkingassemblyfreenanoporereadmapperstoclassifycomplexmillipedegutmicrobiotaviaoxfordnanoporesequencingtechnology