Cargando…

Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor

BACKGROUND: Some consumers with celiac disease use personal, point-of-use gluten detection devices to test food. False-positive results may occur due to sampling, matrix effects, and sensor issues. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine if the positive gluten results some users...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Tricia, Rogers, Adrian, Perry, Johnna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad092
_version_ 1785131862695346176
author Thompson, Tricia
Rogers, Adrian
Perry, Johnna
author_facet Thompson, Tricia
Rogers, Adrian
Perry, Johnna
author_sort Thompson, Tricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some consumers with celiac disease use personal, point-of-use gluten detection devices to test food. False-positive results may occur due to sampling, matrix effects, and sensor issues. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine if the positive gluten results some users were obtaining when testing cream cheese and materials of similar consistency were false positives and, if so, what might be causing them to occur. METHODS: Cream cheese, soft cheese, and yogurt were tested for gluten using the Ridascreen Gliadin R7001 sandwich R5 ELISA and the Ridascreen Gliadin R7021 competitive R5 ELISA. Two test portions were taken, extracted, and tested from each homogenized material. Materials were also analyzed for gluten using a NIMA sensor, a personal, point-of-use gluten detection device. Multiple test portion weights were tested beginning at 0.13 to 0.17 g (the ideal weight of the test portion according to the NIMA sensor development team). RESULTS: Using the sandwich R5 ELISA and the competitive R5 ELISA, all materials tested below the lower LOD for gluten. Using a NIMA sensor, as the weight of the test portion tested increased, sensor results went from no gluten found, to gluten found, to no test result. CONCLUSION: The gluten found results using the NIMA sensor are likely false positives that appear to correspond with the weight and volume of the material tested, as well as the viscosity. There is also an apparent disconnect between the gluten found result reported by the sensor and an interpretation of the lateral flow device (LFD) strip result when assessed by eye which should also be taken into account. Ideally, NIMA sensor users should be advised on the weight amount of material to analyze and test portions should be weighed before being used with the NIMA sensor. However, this is not a practical solution when testing in many environments, including restaurants. HIGHLIGHTS: Slight variations in weight and volume of test materials can result in false positive results when testing dairy matrixes for gluten using the Nima sensor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10628963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106289632023-11-08 Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor Thompson, Tricia Rogers, Adrian Perry, Johnna J AOAC Int Short Communication BACKGROUND: Some consumers with celiac disease use personal, point-of-use gluten detection devices to test food. False-positive results may occur due to sampling, matrix effects, and sensor issues. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine if the positive gluten results some users were obtaining when testing cream cheese and materials of similar consistency were false positives and, if so, what might be causing them to occur. METHODS: Cream cheese, soft cheese, and yogurt were tested for gluten using the Ridascreen Gliadin R7001 sandwich R5 ELISA and the Ridascreen Gliadin R7021 competitive R5 ELISA. Two test portions were taken, extracted, and tested from each homogenized material. Materials were also analyzed for gluten using a NIMA sensor, a personal, point-of-use gluten detection device. Multiple test portion weights were tested beginning at 0.13 to 0.17 g (the ideal weight of the test portion according to the NIMA sensor development team). RESULTS: Using the sandwich R5 ELISA and the competitive R5 ELISA, all materials tested below the lower LOD for gluten. Using a NIMA sensor, as the weight of the test portion tested increased, sensor results went from no gluten found, to gluten found, to no test result. CONCLUSION: The gluten found results using the NIMA sensor are likely false positives that appear to correspond with the weight and volume of the material tested, as well as the viscosity. There is also an apparent disconnect between the gluten found result reported by the sensor and an interpretation of the lateral flow device (LFD) strip result when assessed by eye which should also be taken into account. Ideally, NIMA sensor users should be advised on the weight amount of material to analyze and test portions should be weighed before being used with the NIMA sensor. However, this is not a practical solution when testing in many environments, including restaurants. HIGHLIGHTS: Slight variations in weight and volume of test materials can result in false positive results when testing dairy matrixes for gluten using the Nima sensor. Oxford University Press 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10628963/ /pubmed/37549046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad092 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Thompson, Tricia
Rogers, Adrian
Perry, Johnna
Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor
title Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor
title_full Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor
title_fullStr Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor
title_full_unstemmed Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor
title_short Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor
title_sort consumer-led investigation into potential issues that arise when testing dairy matrixes for gluten with the nima sensor
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad092
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsontricia consumerledinvestigationintopotentialissuesthatarisewhentestingdairymatrixesforglutenwiththenimasensor
AT rogersadrian consumerledinvestigationintopotentialissuesthatarisewhentestingdairymatrixesforglutenwiththenimasensor
AT perryjohnna consumerledinvestigationintopotentialissuesthatarisewhentestingdairymatrixesforglutenwiththenimasensor