Cargando…

Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues

OBJECTIVE: A rolling circle amplification (RCA) based commercial methodology using cell-free (cf)DNA to screen for common trisomies became available in 2018. Relevant publications documented high detection but with a higher than expected 1% false positive rate. Preliminary evidence suggested assay v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palomaki, Glenn E, Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M, Fullerton, Donna, Hegde, Madhuri, Conotte, Stéphanie, Saidel, Matthew L, Jani, Jacques C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37194254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413231173315
_version_ 1785131927622123520
author Palomaki, Glenn E
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M
Fullerton, Donna
Hegde, Madhuri
Conotte, Stéphanie
Saidel, Matthew L
Jani, Jacques C
author_facet Palomaki, Glenn E
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M
Fullerton, Donna
Hegde, Madhuri
Conotte, Stéphanie
Saidel, Matthew L
Jani, Jacques C
author_sort Palomaki, Glenn E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A rolling circle amplification (RCA) based commercial methodology using cell-free (cf)DNA to screen for common trisomies became available in 2018. Relevant publications documented high detection but with a higher than expected 1% false positive rate. Preliminary evidence suggested assay variability was an issue. A multi-center collaboration was created to explore this further and examine whether subsequent manufacturer changes were effective. METHODS: Three academic (four devices) and two commercial (two devices) laboratories provided run date, chromosome 21, 18, and 13 run-specific standard deviations, number of samples run, and reagent lot identifications. Temporal trends and between-site/device consistency were explored. Proportions of run standard deviations exceeding pre-specified caps of 0.4%, 0.4% and 0.6% were computed. RESULTS: Overall, 661 RCA runs between April 2019 and July 30, 2022 tested 39,756 samples. In the first 24, subsequent 9, and final 7 months, proportions of capped chromosome 21 runs dropped from 39% to 22% to 6.0%; for chromosome 18, rates were 76%, 36%, and 4.0%. Few chromosome 13 runs were capped using the original 0.60%, but capping at 0.50%, rates were 28%, 16%, and 7.6%. Final rates occurred after reformulated reagents and imaging software modifications were fully implemented across all devices. Revised detection and false positive rates are estimated at 98.4% and 0.3%, respectively. After repeat testing, failure rates may be as low as 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Current RCA-based screening performance estimates are equivalent to those reported for other methods, but with a lower test failure rate after repeat testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106292512023-11-08 Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues Palomaki, Glenn E Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M Fullerton, Donna Hegde, Madhuri Conotte, Stéphanie Saidel, Matthew L Jani, Jacques C J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVE: A rolling circle amplification (RCA) based commercial methodology using cell-free (cf)DNA to screen for common trisomies became available in 2018. Relevant publications documented high detection but with a higher than expected 1% false positive rate. Preliminary evidence suggested assay variability was an issue. A multi-center collaboration was created to explore this further and examine whether subsequent manufacturer changes were effective. METHODS: Three academic (four devices) and two commercial (two devices) laboratories provided run date, chromosome 21, 18, and 13 run-specific standard deviations, number of samples run, and reagent lot identifications. Temporal trends and between-site/device consistency were explored. Proportions of run standard deviations exceeding pre-specified caps of 0.4%, 0.4% and 0.6% were computed. RESULTS: Overall, 661 RCA runs between April 2019 and July 30, 2022 tested 39,756 samples. In the first 24, subsequent 9, and final 7 months, proportions of capped chromosome 21 runs dropped from 39% to 22% to 6.0%; for chromosome 18, rates were 76%, 36%, and 4.0%. Few chromosome 13 runs were capped using the original 0.60%, but capping at 0.50%, rates were 28%, 16%, and 7.6%. Final rates occurred after reformulated reagents and imaging software modifications were fully implemented across all devices. Revised detection and false positive rates are estimated at 98.4% and 0.3%, respectively. After repeat testing, failure rates may be as low as 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Current RCA-based screening performance estimates are equivalent to those reported for other methods, but with a lower test failure rate after repeat testing. SAGE Publications 2023-05-17 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10629251/ /pubmed/37194254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413231173315 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Palomaki, Glenn E
Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M
Fullerton, Donna
Hegde, Madhuri
Conotte, Stéphanie
Saidel, Matthew L
Jani, Jacques C
Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues
title Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues
title_full Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues
title_fullStr Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues
title_full_unstemmed Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues
title_short Cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: Identifying and resolving analytic issues
title_sort cell-free dna-based prenatal screening via rolling circle amplification: identifying and resolving analytic issues
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37194254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413231173315
work_keys_str_mv AT palomakiglenne cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues
AT lambertmesserliangeralynm cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues
AT fullertondonna cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues
AT hegdemadhuri cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues
AT conottestephanie cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues
AT saidelmatthewl cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues
AT janijacquesc cellfreednabasedprenatalscreeningviarollingcircleamplificationidentifyingandresolvinganalyticissues