Cargando…

Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair

Oncogene amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a pervasive driver event in cancer, yet our understanding of how ecDNA forms is limited. Here, we couple a CRISPR-based method for induction of ecDNA with extensive characterization of newly formed ecDNA to examine ecDNA biogenesis. We find t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, John C., Wong, Ivy Tsz-Lo, Daniel, Bence, Jones, Matthew G., Yost, Kathryn E., Hung, King L., Curtis, Ellis J., Mischel, Paul S., Chang, Howard Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.22.563489
_version_ 1785146231037624320
author Rose, John C.
Wong, Ivy Tsz-Lo
Daniel, Bence
Jones, Matthew G.
Yost, Kathryn E.
Hung, King L.
Curtis, Ellis J.
Mischel, Paul S.
Chang, Howard Y.
author_facet Rose, John C.
Wong, Ivy Tsz-Lo
Daniel, Bence
Jones, Matthew G.
Yost, Kathryn E.
Hung, King L.
Curtis, Ellis J.
Mischel, Paul S.
Chang, Howard Y.
author_sort Rose, John C.
collection PubMed
description Oncogene amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a pervasive driver event in cancer, yet our understanding of how ecDNA forms is limited. Here, we couple a CRISPR-based method for induction of ecDNA with extensive characterization of newly formed ecDNA to examine ecDNA biogenesis. We find that DNA circularization is efficient, irrespective of 3D genome context, with formation of a 1 Mb and 1.8 Mb ecDNA both reaching 15%. We show non-homologous end joining and microhomology mediated end joining both contribute to ecDNA formation, while inhibition of DNA-PKcs and ATM have opposing impacts on ecDNA formation. EcDNA and the corresponding chromosomal excision scar form at significantly different rates and respond differently to DNA-PKcs and ATM inhibition. Taken together, our results support a model of ecDNA formation in which double strand break ends dissociate from their legitimate ligation partners prior to joining of illegitimate ends to form the ecDNA and excision scar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10634728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106347282023-11-13 Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair Rose, John C. Wong, Ivy Tsz-Lo Daniel, Bence Jones, Matthew G. Yost, Kathryn E. Hung, King L. Curtis, Ellis J. Mischel, Paul S. Chang, Howard Y. bioRxiv Article Oncogene amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a pervasive driver event in cancer, yet our understanding of how ecDNA forms is limited. Here, we couple a CRISPR-based method for induction of ecDNA with extensive characterization of newly formed ecDNA to examine ecDNA biogenesis. We find that DNA circularization is efficient, irrespective of 3D genome context, with formation of a 1 Mb and 1.8 Mb ecDNA both reaching 15%. We show non-homologous end joining and microhomology mediated end joining both contribute to ecDNA formation, while inhibition of DNA-PKcs and ATM have opposing impacts on ecDNA formation. EcDNA and the corresponding chromosomal excision scar form at significantly different rates and respond differently to DNA-PKcs and ATM inhibition. Taken together, our results support a model of ecDNA formation in which double strand break ends dissociate from their legitimate ligation partners prior to joining of illegitimate ends to form the ecDNA and excision scar. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10634728/ /pubmed/37961138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.22.563489 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Rose, John C.
Wong, Ivy Tsz-Lo
Daniel, Bence
Jones, Matthew G.
Yost, Kathryn E.
Hung, King L.
Curtis, Ellis J.
Mischel, Paul S.
Chang, Howard Y.
Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair
title Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair
title_full Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair
title_fullStr Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair
title_full_unstemmed Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair
title_short Disparate pathways for extrachromosomal DNA biogenesis and genomic DNA repair
title_sort disparate pathways for extrachromosomal dna biogenesis and genomic dna repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.22.563489
work_keys_str_mv AT rosejohnc disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT wongivytszlo disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT danielbence disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT jonesmatthewg disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT yostkathryne disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT hungkingl disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT curtisellisj disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT mischelpauls disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair
AT changhowardy disparatepathwaysforextrachromosomaldnabiogenesisandgenomicdnarepair