Cargando…

Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective

This mixed methods sequential explanatory study identified and explained the features of engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion that help low-achieving students make significant progress. Triangulated data were collected from MOOC learners’ (n = 335) scores in two reading assessments, their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Wei, Liu, Jia, Xu, Xiaoshu, Kolletar-Zhu, Kimberly, Zhang, Yunfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293668
_version_ 1785133017620021248
author Wei, Wei
Liu, Jia
Xu, Xiaoshu
Kolletar-Zhu, Kimberly
Zhang, Yunfeng
author_facet Wei, Wei
Liu, Jia
Xu, Xiaoshu
Kolletar-Zhu, Kimberly
Zhang, Yunfeng
author_sort Wei, Wei
collection PubMed
description This mixed methods sequential explanatory study identified and explained the features of engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion that help low-achieving students make significant progress. Triangulated data were collected from MOOC learners’ (n = 335) scores in two reading assessments, their posts to the embedded online discussion forum, and their self-reflection learning journals. Based on learning progress between pre- and post-assessment tasks, MOOC learners are divided into three groups: 1) little, 2) moderate, and 3) significant progress. According to a statistical analysis of the quantified posts, surprisingly, the low-scoring students from the pre-test who demonstrated significant progress later engaged in significantly fewer peer-peer and peer-teacher interactions in the online discussion forum. Guided by self-efficacy literature, the reflective journals of these learners suggested that 1) learner-content interactions may help them advance learning and obtain new information and linguistic knowledge from the peer-made learning materials in the discussion forum; 2) they did not share and exchange ideas and answers with their peers. Instead, they prefer learning from others’ discussions and wish to get quick feedback and suggestions on their contributions to the discussion forum; and 3) peer-peer and peer-teacher interactions were proposed as two solutions to regulate their online learning experience as they lack self-discipline and time-management skills. Implications include teachers’ continuous support to encourage low-achieving students to learn peer-generated content and quick feedback on their contributions to the discussion forum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106355352023-11-10 Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective Wei, Wei Liu, Jia Xu, Xiaoshu Kolletar-Zhu, Kimberly Zhang, Yunfeng PLoS One Research Article This mixed methods sequential explanatory study identified and explained the features of engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion that help low-achieving students make significant progress. Triangulated data were collected from MOOC learners’ (n = 335) scores in two reading assessments, their posts to the embedded online discussion forum, and their self-reflection learning journals. Based on learning progress between pre- and post-assessment tasks, MOOC learners are divided into three groups: 1) little, 2) moderate, and 3) significant progress. According to a statistical analysis of the quantified posts, surprisingly, the low-scoring students from the pre-test who demonstrated significant progress later engaged in significantly fewer peer-peer and peer-teacher interactions in the online discussion forum. Guided by self-efficacy literature, the reflective journals of these learners suggested that 1) learner-content interactions may help them advance learning and obtain new information and linguistic knowledge from the peer-made learning materials in the discussion forum; 2) they did not share and exchange ideas and answers with their peers. Instead, they prefer learning from others’ discussions and wish to get quick feedback and suggestions on their contributions to the discussion forum; and 3) peer-peer and peer-teacher interactions were proposed as two solutions to regulate their online learning experience as they lack self-discipline and time-management skills. Implications include teachers’ continuous support to encourage low-achieving students to learn peer-generated content and quick feedback on their contributions to the discussion forum. Public Library of Science 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10635535/ /pubmed/37943846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293668 Text en © 2023 Wei et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Wei
Liu, Jia
Xu, Xiaoshu
Kolletar-Zhu, Kimberly
Zhang, Yunfeng
Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective
title Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective
title_full Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective
title_fullStr Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective
title_full_unstemmed Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective
title_short Effective interactive engagement strategies for MOOC forum discussion: A self-efficacy perspective
title_sort effective interactive engagement strategies for mooc forum discussion: a self-efficacy perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293668
work_keys_str_mv AT weiwei effectiveinteractiveengagementstrategiesformoocforumdiscussionaselfefficacyperspective
AT liujia effectiveinteractiveengagementstrategiesformoocforumdiscussionaselfefficacyperspective
AT xuxiaoshu effectiveinteractiveengagementstrategiesformoocforumdiscussionaselfefficacyperspective
AT kolletarzhukimberly effectiveinteractiveengagementstrategiesformoocforumdiscussionaselfefficacyperspective
AT zhangyunfeng effectiveinteractiveengagementstrategiesformoocforumdiscussionaselfefficacyperspective