Cargando…

Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat

The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariano, Ermie Jr., Lee, Da Young, Yun, Seung Hyeon, Lee, Juhyun, Lee, Seung Yun, Hur, Sun Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969330
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48
_version_ 1785146410409132032
author Mariano, Ermie Jr.
Lee, Da Young
Yun, Seung Hyeon
Lee, Juhyun
Lee, Seung Yun
Hur, Sun Jin
author_facet Mariano, Ermie Jr.
Lee, Da Young
Yun, Seung Hyeon
Lee, Juhyun
Lee, Seung Yun
Hur, Sun Jin
author_sort Mariano, Ermie Jr.
collection PubMed
description The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106362242023-11-15 Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat Mariano, Ermie Jr. Lee, Da Young Yun, Seung Hyeon Lee, Juhyun Lee, Seung Yun Hur, Sun Jin Food Sci Anim Resour Special Section Reviews The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat. Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2023-11 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10636224/ /pubmed/37969330 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48 Text en © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Section Reviews
Mariano, Ermie Jr.
Lee, Da Young
Yun, Seung Hyeon
Lee, Juhyun
Lee, Seung Yun
Hur, Sun Jin
Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
title Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
title_full Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
title_fullStr Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
title_full_unstemmed Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
title_short Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
title_sort checkmeat: a review on the applicability of conventional meat authentication techniques to cultured meat
topic Special Section Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969330
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48
work_keys_str_mv AT marianoermiejr checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat
AT leedayoung checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat
AT yunseunghyeon checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat
AT leejuhyun checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat
AT leeseungyun checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat
AT hursunjin checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat