Cargando…
Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969330 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48 |
_version_ | 1785146410409132032 |
---|---|
author | Mariano, Ermie Jr. Lee, Da Young Yun, Seung Hyeon Lee, Juhyun Lee, Seung Yun Hur, Sun Jin |
author_facet | Mariano, Ermie Jr. Lee, Da Young Yun, Seung Hyeon Lee, Juhyun Lee, Seung Yun Hur, Sun Jin |
author_sort | Mariano, Ermie Jr. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10636224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106362242023-11-15 Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat Mariano, Ermie Jr. Lee, Da Young Yun, Seung Hyeon Lee, Juhyun Lee, Seung Yun Hur, Sun Jin Food Sci Anim Resour Special Section Reviews The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat. Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2023-11 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10636224/ /pubmed/37969330 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48 Text en © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Section Reviews Mariano, Ermie Jr. Lee, Da Young Yun, Seung Hyeon Lee, Juhyun Lee, Seung Yun Hur, Sun Jin Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat |
title | Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat
Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat |
title_full | Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat
Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat |
title_fullStr | Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat
Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat |
title_full_unstemmed | Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat
Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat |
title_short | Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat
Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat |
title_sort | checkmeat: a review on the applicability of conventional meat
authentication techniques to cultured meat |
topic | Special Section Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969330 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marianoermiejr checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat AT leedayoung checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat AT yunseunghyeon checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat AT leejuhyun checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat AT leeseungyun checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat AT hursunjin checkmeatareviewontheapplicabilityofconventionalmeatauthenticationtechniquestoculturedmeat |