Cargando…

Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate

Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for folic acid/folate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turck, Dominique, Bohn, Torsten, Castenmiller, Jacqueline, de Henauw, Stefaan, Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico, Knutsen, Helle Katrine, Maciuk, Alexandre, Mangelsdorf, Inge, McArdle, Harry J., Pentieva, Kristina, Siani, Alfonso, Thies, Frank, Tsabouri, Sophia, Vinceti, Marco, Crous‐Bou, Marta, Molloy, Anne, Ciccolallo, Laura, de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès, Fabiani, Lucia, Horvath, Zsuzsanna, Karavasiloglou, Nena, Naska, Androniki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965303
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353
_version_ 1785146814461116416
author Turck, Dominique
Bohn, Torsten
Castenmiller, Jacqueline
de Henauw, Stefaan
Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
Maciuk, Alexandre
Mangelsdorf, Inge
McArdle, Harry J.
Pentieva, Kristina
Siani, Alfonso
Thies, Frank
Tsabouri, Sophia
Vinceti, Marco
Crous‐Bou, Marta
Molloy, Anne
Ciccolallo, Laura
de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès
Fabiani, Lucia
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Karavasiloglou, Nena
Naska, Androniki
author_facet Turck, Dominique
Bohn, Torsten
Castenmiller, Jacqueline
de Henauw, Stefaan
Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
Maciuk, Alexandre
Mangelsdorf, Inge
McArdle, Harry J.
Pentieva, Kristina
Siani, Alfonso
Thies, Frank
Tsabouri, Sophia
Vinceti, Marco
Crous‐Bou, Marta
Molloy, Anne
Ciccolallo, Laura
de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès
Fabiani, Lucia
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Karavasiloglou, Nena
Naska, Androniki
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for folic acid/folate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to assess evidence on priority adverse health effects of excess intake of folate (including folic acid and the other authorised forms, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts), namely risk of cobalamin‐dependent neuropathy, cognitive decline among people with low cobalamin status, and colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. The evidence is insufficient to conclude on a positive and causal relationship between the dietary intake of folate and impaired cognitive function, risk of colorectal and prostate cancer. The risk of progression of neurological symptoms in cobalamin‐deficient patients is considered as the critical effect to establish an UL for folic acid. No new evidence has been published that could improve the characterisation of the dose–response between folic acid intake and resolution of megaloblastic anaemia in cobalamin‐deficient individuals. The ULs for folic acid previously established by the Scientific Committee on Food are retained for all population groups, i.e. 1000 μg/day for adults, including pregnant and lactating women, 200 μg/day for children aged 1–3 years, 300 μg/day for 4–6 years, 400 μg/day for 7–10 years, 600 μg/day for 11–14 years and 800 μg/day for 15–17 years. A UL of 200 μg/day is established for infants aged 4–11 months. The ULs apply to the combined intake of folic acid, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts, under their authorised conditions of use. It is unlikely that the ULs for supplemental folate are exceeded in European populations, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of folic acid/5‐methyl‐tetrahydrofolic acid salts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10641704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106417042023-11-14 Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J. Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Crous‐Bou, Marta Molloy, Anne Ciccolallo, Laura de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès Fabiani, Lucia Horvath, Zsuzsanna Karavasiloglou, Nena Naska, Androniki EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for folic acid/folate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to assess evidence on priority adverse health effects of excess intake of folate (including folic acid and the other authorised forms, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts), namely risk of cobalamin‐dependent neuropathy, cognitive decline among people with low cobalamin status, and colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. The evidence is insufficient to conclude on a positive and causal relationship between the dietary intake of folate and impaired cognitive function, risk of colorectal and prostate cancer. The risk of progression of neurological symptoms in cobalamin‐deficient patients is considered as the critical effect to establish an UL for folic acid. No new evidence has been published that could improve the characterisation of the dose–response between folic acid intake and resolution of megaloblastic anaemia in cobalamin‐deficient individuals. The ULs for folic acid previously established by the Scientific Committee on Food are retained for all population groups, i.e. 1000 μg/day for adults, including pregnant and lactating women, 200 μg/day for children aged 1–3 years, 300 μg/day for 4–6 years, 400 μg/day for 7–10 years, 600 μg/day for 11–14 years and 800 μg/day for 15–17 years. A UL of 200 μg/day is established for infants aged 4–11 months. The ULs apply to the combined intake of folic acid, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts, under their authorised conditions of use. It is unlikely that the ULs for supplemental folate are exceeded in European populations, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of folic acid/5‐methyl‐tetrahydrofolic acid salts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10641704/ /pubmed/37965303 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Turck, Dominique
Bohn, Torsten
Castenmiller, Jacqueline
de Henauw, Stefaan
Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
Maciuk, Alexandre
Mangelsdorf, Inge
McArdle, Harry J.
Pentieva, Kristina
Siani, Alfonso
Thies, Frank
Tsabouri, Sophia
Vinceti, Marco
Crous‐Bou, Marta
Molloy, Anne
Ciccolallo, Laura
de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès
Fabiani, Lucia
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Karavasiloglou, Nena
Naska, Androniki
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
title Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
title_full Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
title_fullStr Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
title_full_unstemmed Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
title_short Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
title_sort scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965303
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT turckdominique scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT bohntorsten scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT castenmillerjacqueline scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT dehenauwstefaan scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT hirschernstkarenildico scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT knutsenhellekatrine scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT maciukalexandre scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT mangelsdorfinge scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT mcardleharryj scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT pentievakristina scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT sianialfonso scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT thiesfrank scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT tsabourisophia scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT vincetimarco scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT crousboumarta scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT molloyanne scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT ciccolallolaura scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT desesmaisonslecarreagnes scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT fabianilucia scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT horvathzsuzsanna scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT karavasiloglounena scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate
AT naskaandroniki scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate