Cargando…
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate
Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for folic acid/folate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965303 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353 |
_version_ | 1785146814461116416 |
---|---|
author | Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J. Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Crous‐Bou, Marta Molloy, Anne Ciccolallo, Laura de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès Fabiani, Lucia Horvath, Zsuzsanna Karavasiloglou, Nena Naska, Androniki |
author_facet | Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J. Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Crous‐Bou, Marta Molloy, Anne Ciccolallo, Laura de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès Fabiani, Lucia Horvath, Zsuzsanna Karavasiloglou, Nena Naska, Androniki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for folic acid/folate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to assess evidence on priority adverse health effects of excess intake of folate (including folic acid and the other authorised forms, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts), namely risk of cobalamin‐dependent neuropathy, cognitive decline among people with low cobalamin status, and colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. The evidence is insufficient to conclude on a positive and causal relationship between the dietary intake of folate and impaired cognitive function, risk of colorectal and prostate cancer. The risk of progression of neurological symptoms in cobalamin‐deficient patients is considered as the critical effect to establish an UL for folic acid. No new evidence has been published that could improve the characterisation of the dose–response between folic acid intake and resolution of megaloblastic anaemia in cobalamin‐deficient individuals. The ULs for folic acid previously established by the Scientific Committee on Food are retained for all population groups, i.e. 1000 μg/day for adults, including pregnant and lactating women, 200 μg/day for children aged 1–3 years, 300 μg/day for 4–6 years, 400 μg/day for 7–10 years, 600 μg/day for 11–14 years and 800 μg/day for 15–17 years. A UL of 200 μg/day is established for infants aged 4–11 months. The ULs apply to the combined intake of folic acid, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts, under their authorised conditions of use. It is unlikely that the ULs for supplemental folate are exceeded in European populations, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of folic acid/5‐methyl‐tetrahydrofolic acid salts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10641704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106417042023-11-14 Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J. Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Crous‐Bou, Marta Molloy, Anne Ciccolallo, Laura de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès Fabiani, Lucia Horvath, Zsuzsanna Karavasiloglou, Nena Naska, Androniki EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the revision of the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for folic acid/folate. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to assess evidence on priority adverse health effects of excess intake of folate (including folic acid and the other authorised forms, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts), namely risk of cobalamin‐dependent neuropathy, cognitive decline among people with low cobalamin status, and colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. The evidence is insufficient to conclude on a positive and causal relationship between the dietary intake of folate and impaired cognitive function, risk of colorectal and prostate cancer. The risk of progression of neurological symptoms in cobalamin‐deficient patients is considered as the critical effect to establish an UL for folic acid. No new evidence has been published that could improve the characterisation of the dose–response between folic acid intake and resolution of megaloblastic anaemia in cobalamin‐deficient individuals. The ULs for folic acid previously established by the Scientific Committee on Food are retained for all population groups, i.e. 1000 μg/day for adults, including pregnant and lactating women, 200 μg/day for children aged 1–3 years, 300 μg/day for 4–6 years, 400 μg/day for 7–10 years, 600 μg/day for 11–14 years and 800 μg/day for 15–17 years. A UL of 200 μg/day is established for infants aged 4–11 months. The ULs apply to the combined intake of folic acid, (6S)‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine and l‐5‐methyltetrahydrofolic acid calcium salts, under their authorised conditions of use. It is unlikely that the ULs for supplemental folate are exceeded in European populations, except for regular users of food supplements containing high doses of folic acid/5‐methyl‐tetrahydrofolic acid salts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10641704/ /pubmed/37965303 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Turck, Dominique Bohn, Torsten Castenmiller, Jacqueline de Henauw, Stefaan Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen‐Ildico Knutsen, Helle Katrine Maciuk, Alexandre Mangelsdorf, Inge McArdle, Harry J. Pentieva, Kristina Siani, Alfonso Thies, Frank Tsabouri, Sophia Vinceti, Marco Crous‐Bou, Marta Molloy, Anne Ciccolallo, Laura de Sesmaisons Lecarré, Agnès Fabiani, Lucia Horvath, Zsuzsanna Karavasiloglou, Nena Naska, Androniki Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
title | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
title_full | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
title_short | Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
title_sort | scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965303 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT turckdominique scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT bohntorsten scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT castenmillerjacqueline scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT dehenauwstefaan scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT hirschernstkarenildico scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT knutsenhellekatrine scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT maciukalexandre scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT mangelsdorfinge scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT mcardleharryj scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT pentievakristina scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT sianialfonso scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT thiesfrank scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT tsabourisophia scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT vincetimarco scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT crousboumarta scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT molloyanne scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT ciccolallolaura scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT desesmaisonslecarreagnes scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT fabianilucia scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT horvathzsuzsanna scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT karavasiloglounena scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate AT naskaandroniki scientificopiniononthetolerableupperintakelevelforfolate |