Cargando…
From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching
BACKGROUND: This experimental study was performed to evaluate the role of blended learning for technical skill teaching on the European Trauma Course (ETC). While online modules are extensively used for theoretical teaching, their role in skills training remains less well explored. The ETC currently...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4 |
_version_ | 1785147276633571328 |
---|---|
author | Bergmans, Elonka Billington, Alistair Thies, Karl-Christian |
author_facet | Bergmans, Elonka Billington, Alistair Thies, Karl-Christian |
author_sort | Bergmans, Elonka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This experimental study was performed to evaluate the role of blended learning for technical skill teaching on the European Trauma Course (ETC). While online modules are extensively used for theoretical teaching, their role in skills training remains less well explored. The ETC currently relies on the established 4-step technique for teaching technical skills. However, the required large cohort of skilled instructors and the time intensity prove increasingly challenging in a current climate of staff shortages and funding constraints. This study assesses if blended learning, combining pre-course online elements with face-to-face training matches the effectiveness of the traditional 4-step approach whilst being more time-efficient. METHODS: In a randomised, multi-centre trial, the conventional face-to-face 4-step technique for teaching a skill of medium complexity, the application of a pelvic binder, was compared with an innovative blended approach. It was hypothesised that the blended approach was non-inferior for skill performance measured after the teaching session and after two days (skill retention) with the time needed for teaching and student/teacher satisfaction as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety participants, divided into 44 traditional and 46 blended method students, were analysed. Independent-samples t-test showed no significant difference in performance scores and non-inferiority of the blended approach with a half of one standard deviation margin. A statistically significant difference in mean retention scores favored the blended approach. A Mann–Whitney U Test revealed no significant difference in candidate satisfaction levels but a statistically significant difference in instructors' satisfaction levels in favour of the blended approach. Analysis with Welch' t-test demonstrated that the face-to-face teaching time needed for the blended approach was significantly shorter (by 6 min). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a blended approach with the 4-step technique for teaching pelvic binder application in the ETC streamlined teaching without compromising skill acquisition quality. This innovative approach addresses traditional limitations and shows promise in adapting medical education to modern learning and teaching demands. We suggest that blended learning could also be applied for other skills taught on life support courses. Trial registration: University of Dundee (Schools of Medicine and Life sciences Research Ethics Committee, REC number 22/59, 28th June 2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106446582023-11-14 From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching Bergmans, Elonka Billington, Alistair Thies, Karl-Christian Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: This experimental study was performed to evaluate the role of blended learning for technical skill teaching on the European Trauma Course (ETC). While online modules are extensively used for theoretical teaching, their role in skills training remains less well explored. The ETC currently relies on the established 4-step technique for teaching technical skills. However, the required large cohort of skilled instructors and the time intensity prove increasingly challenging in a current climate of staff shortages and funding constraints. This study assesses if blended learning, combining pre-course online elements with face-to-face training matches the effectiveness of the traditional 4-step approach whilst being more time-efficient. METHODS: In a randomised, multi-centre trial, the conventional face-to-face 4-step technique for teaching a skill of medium complexity, the application of a pelvic binder, was compared with an innovative blended approach. It was hypothesised that the blended approach was non-inferior for skill performance measured after the teaching session and after two days (skill retention) with the time needed for teaching and student/teacher satisfaction as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety participants, divided into 44 traditional and 46 blended method students, were analysed. Independent-samples t-test showed no significant difference in performance scores and non-inferiority of the blended approach with a half of one standard deviation margin. A statistically significant difference in mean retention scores favored the blended approach. A Mann–Whitney U Test revealed no significant difference in candidate satisfaction levels but a statistically significant difference in instructors' satisfaction levels in favour of the blended approach. Analysis with Welch' t-test demonstrated that the face-to-face teaching time needed for the blended approach was significantly shorter (by 6 min). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a blended approach with the 4-step technique for teaching pelvic binder application in the ETC streamlined teaching without compromising skill acquisition quality. This innovative approach addresses traditional limitations and shows promise in adapting medical education to modern learning and teaching demands. We suggest that blended learning could also be applied for other skills taught on life support courses. Trial registration: University of Dundee (Schools of Medicine and Life sciences Research Ethics Committee, REC number 22/59, 28th June 2022). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4. BioMed Central 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10644658/ /pubmed/37964361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bergmans, Elonka Billington, Alistair Thies, Karl-Christian From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
title | From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
title_full | From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
title_fullStr | From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
title_full_unstemmed | From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
title_short | From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
title_sort | from tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergmanselonka fromtraditiontoinnovationacomparisonofthetraditional4stepapproachversusablendedlearningmodificationfortechnicalskillsteaching AT billingtonalistair fromtraditiontoinnovationacomparisonofthetraditional4stepapproachversusablendedlearningmodificationfortechnicalskillsteaching AT thieskarlchristian fromtraditiontoinnovationacomparisonofthetraditional4stepapproachversusablendedlearningmodificationfortechnicalskillsteaching |