Cargando…

Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage

Sequences that form DNA secondary structures, such as G‐quadruplexes (G4s) and intercalated‐Motifs (iMs), are abundant in the human genome and play various physiological roles. However, they can also interfere with replication and threaten genome stability. Multiple lines of evidence suggest G4s inh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Sophie L, Casas‐Delucchi, Corella S, Raguseo, Federica, Guneri, Dilek, Li, Yunxuan, Minamino, Masashi, Fletcher, Emma E, Yeeles, Joseph TP, Keyser, Ulrich F, Waller, Zoë AE, Di Antonio, Marco, Coster, Gideon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781931
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023114334
_version_ 1785134920867250176
author Williams, Sophie L
Casas‐Delucchi, Corella S
Raguseo, Federica
Guneri, Dilek
Li, Yunxuan
Minamino, Masashi
Fletcher, Emma E
Yeeles, Joseph TP
Keyser, Ulrich F
Waller, Zoë AE
Di Antonio, Marco
Coster, Gideon
author_facet Williams, Sophie L
Casas‐Delucchi, Corella S
Raguseo, Federica
Guneri, Dilek
Li, Yunxuan
Minamino, Masashi
Fletcher, Emma E
Yeeles, Joseph TP
Keyser, Ulrich F
Waller, Zoë AE
Di Antonio, Marco
Coster, Gideon
author_sort Williams, Sophie L
collection PubMed
description Sequences that form DNA secondary structures, such as G‐quadruplexes (G4s) and intercalated‐Motifs (iMs), are abundant in the human genome and play various physiological roles. However, they can also interfere with replication and threaten genome stability. Multiple lines of evidence suggest G4s inhibit replication, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Moreover, evidence of how iMs affect the replisome is lacking. Here, we reconstitute replication of physiologically derived structure‐forming sequences to find that a single G4 or iM arrest DNA replication. Direct single‐molecule structure detection within solid‐state nanopores reveals structures form as a consequence of replication. Combined genetic and biophysical characterisation establishes that structure stability and probability of structure formation are key determinants of replisome arrest. Mechanistically, replication arrest is caused by impaired synthesis, resulting in helicase‐polymerase uncoupling. Significantly, iMs also induce breakage of nascent DNA. Finally, stalled forks are only rescued by a specialised helicase, Pif1, but not Rrm3, Sgs1, Chl1 or Hrq1. Altogether, we provide a mechanism for quadruplex structure formation and resolution during replication and highlight G4s and iMs as endogenous sources of replication stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10646557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106465572023-10-02 Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage Williams, Sophie L Casas‐Delucchi, Corella S Raguseo, Federica Guneri, Dilek Li, Yunxuan Minamino, Masashi Fletcher, Emma E Yeeles, Joseph TP Keyser, Ulrich F Waller, Zoë AE Di Antonio, Marco Coster, Gideon EMBO J Articles Sequences that form DNA secondary structures, such as G‐quadruplexes (G4s) and intercalated‐Motifs (iMs), are abundant in the human genome and play various physiological roles. However, they can also interfere with replication and threaten genome stability. Multiple lines of evidence suggest G4s inhibit replication, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Moreover, evidence of how iMs affect the replisome is lacking. Here, we reconstitute replication of physiologically derived structure‐forming sequences to find that a single G4 or iM arrest DNA replication. Direct single‐molecule structure detection within solid‐state nanopores reveals structures form as a consequence of replication. Combined genetic and biophysical characterisation establishes that structure stability and probability of structure formation are key determinants of replisome arrest. Mechanistically, replication arrest is caused by impaired synthesis, resulting in helicase‐polymerase uncoupling. Significantly, iMs also induce breakage of nascent DNA. Finally, stalled forks are only rescued by a specialised helicase, Pif1, but not Rrm3, Sgs1, Chl1 or Hrq1. Altogether, we provide a mechanism for quadruplex structure formation and resolution during replication and highlight G4s and iMs as endogenous sources of replication stress. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10646557/ /pubmed/37781931 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023114334 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Williams, Sophie L
Casas‐Delucchi, Corella S
Raguseo, Federica
Guneri, Dilek
Li, Yunxuan
Minamino, Masashi
Fletcher, Emma E
Yeeles, Joseph TP
Keyser, Ulrich F
Waller, Zoë AE
Di Antonio, Marco
Coster, Gideon
Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
title Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
title_full Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
title_fullStr Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
title_full_unstemmed Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
title_short Replication‐induced DNA secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
title_sort replication‐induced dna secondary structures drive fork uncoupling and breakage
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781931
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2023114334
work_keys_str_mv AT williamssophiel replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT casasdelucchicorellas replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT raguseofederica replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT guneridilek replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT liyunxuan replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT minaminomasashi replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT fletcheremmae replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT yeelesjosephtp replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT keyserulrichf replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT wallerzoeae replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT diantoniomarco replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage
AT costergideon replicationinduceddnasecondarystructuresdriveforkuncouplingandbreakage