Cargando…

Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

Cerebellum (CB) and primary motor cortex (M1) have been associated with motor learning, with different putative roles. Modulation of task performance through application of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) to brain structures provides causal evidence for their engagement in the task. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voegtle, Angela, Terlutter, Clara, Nikolai, Katharina, Farahat, Amr, Hinrichs, Hermann, Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-022-01487-0
_version_ 1785137185794555904
author Voegtle, Angela
Terlutter, Clara
Nikolai, Katharina
Farahat, Amr
Hinrichs, Hermann
Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M.
author_facet Voegtle, Angela
Terlutter, Clara
Nikolai, Katharina
Farahat, Amr
Hinrichs, Hermann
Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M.
author_sort Voegtle, Angela
collection PubMed
description Cerebellum (CB) and primary motor cortex (M1) have been associated with motor learning, with different putative roles. Modulation of task performance through application of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) to brain structures provides causal evidence for their engagement in the task. Studies evaluating and comparing TDCS to these structures have provided conflicting results, however, likely due to varying paradigms and stimulation parameters. Here we applied TDCS to CB and M1 within the same experimental design, to enable direct comparison of their roles in motor sequence learning. We examined the effects of anodal TDCS during motor sequence learning in 60 healthy participants, randomly allocated to CB-TDCS, M1-TDCS, or Sham stimulation groups during a serial reaction time task. Key to the design was an equal number of repeated and random sequences. Reaction times (RTs) to implicitly learned and random sequences were compared between groups using ANOVAs and post hoc t-tests. A speed–accuracy trade-off was excluded by analogous analysis of accuracy scores. An interaction was observed between whether responses were to learned or random sequences and the stimulation group. Post hoc analyses revealed a preferential slowing of RTs to implicitly learned sequences in the group receiving CB-TDCS. Our findings provide evidence that CB function can be modulated through transcranial application of a weak electrical current, that the CB and M1 cortex perform separable functions in the task, and that the CB plays a specific role in motor sequence learning during implicit motor sequence learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12311-022-01487-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10657296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106572962022-10-14 Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Voegtle, Angela Terlutter, Clara Nikolai, Katharina Farahat, Amr Hinrichs, Hermann Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M. Cerebellum Original Article Cerebellum (CB) and primary motor cortex (M1) have been associated with motor learning, with different putative roles. Modulation of task performance through application of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) to brain structures provides causal evidence for their engagement in the task. Studies evaluating and comparing TDCS to these structures have provided conflicting results, however, likely due to varying paradigms and stimulation parameters. Here we applied TDCS to CB and M1 within the same experimental design, to enable direct comparison of their roles in motor sequence learning. We examined the effects of anodal TDCS during motor sequence learning in 60 healthy participants, randomly allocated to CB-TDCS, M1-TDCS, or Sham stimulation groups during a serial reaction time task. Key to the design was an equal number of repeated and random sequences. Reaction times (RTs) to implicitly learned and random sequences were compared between groups using ANOVAs and post hoc t-tests. A speed–accuracy trade-off was excluded by analogous analysis of accuracy scores. An interaction was observed between whether responses were to learned or random sequences and the stimulation group. Post hoc analyses revealed a preferential slowing of RTs to implicitly learned sequences in the group receiving CB-TDCS. Our findings provide evidence that CB function can be modulated through transcranial application of a weak electrical current, that the CB and M1 cortex perform separable functions in the task, and that the CB plays a specific role in motor sequence learning during implicit motor sequence learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12311-022-01487-0. Springer US 2022-10-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10657296/ /pubmed/36239839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-022-01487-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Voegtle, Angela
Terlutter, Clara
Nikolai, Katharina
Farahat, Amr
Hinrichs, Hermann
Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M.
Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_full Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_fullStr Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_short Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_sort suppression of motor sequence learning and execution through anodal cerebellar transcranial electrical stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-022-01487-0
work_keys_str_mv AT voegtleangela suppressionofmotorsequencelearningandexecutionthroughanodalcerebellartranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT terlutterclara suppressionofmotorsequencelearningandexecutionthroughanodalcerebellartranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT nikolaikatharina suppressionofmotorsequencelearningandexecutionthroughanodalcerebellartranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT farahatamr suppressionofmotorsequencelearningandexecutionthroughanodalcerebellartranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT hinrichshermann suppressionofmotorsequencelearningandexecutionthroughanodalcerebellartranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT sweeneyreedcatherinem suppressionofmotorsequencelearningandexecutionthroughanodalcerebellartranscranialelectricalstimulation