Cargando…
Is two-point method a valid and reliable method to predict 1RM? A systematic review
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the two-point method in predicting 1RM compared to the direct method, as well as analyze the factors influencing its accuracy. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases was conducted. O...
Autores principales: | Chen, Zongwei, Gong, Zheng, Pan, Liwen, Zhang, Xiuli |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37983216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294509 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Validity and reliability of the motivation for physical activity (RM4-FM) questionnaire
por: Uimonen, Mikko, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Load-velocity relationships and predicted maximal strength: A systematic review of the validity and reliability of current methods
por: Marston, Kieran J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reliability and validity of the multi-point method and the 2-point method’s variations of estimating the one-repetition maximum for deadlift and back squat exercises
por: Çetin, Onat, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Test–Retest Reliability of the One-Repetition Maximum (1RM) Strength Assessment: a Systematic Review
por: Grgic, Jozo, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A systematic review on the validity and reliability of tape measurement method in leg length discrepancy
por: Farahmand, Behshid, et al.
Publicado: (2019)