Cargando…

Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) rely on a composite primary outcome to capture unfavorable treatment responses. However, variability between trials in the outcome definition and estimation methods complicates across-trial comparisons and hinders the advancement o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weir, Isabelle R, Dufault, Suzanne M, Phillips, Patrick PJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986887
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3486707/v1
_version_ 1785148333334986752
author Weir, Isabelle R
Dufault, Suzanne M
Phillips, Patrick PJ
author_facet Weir, Isabelle R
Dufault, Suzanne M
Phillips, Patrick PJ
author_sort Weir, Isabelle R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomized trials for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) rely on a composite primary outcome to capture unfavorable treatment responses. However, variability between trials in the outcome definition and estimation methods complicates across-trial comparisons and hinders the advancement of treatment guidelines. The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) provides international regulatory standards for clinical trials. The estimand framework outlined in the recent ICH E9(R1) addendum offers a timely opportunity for randomized trials of TB treatment to adopt broadly standardized outcome definitions and analytic approaches. We previously proposed and defined four estimands for use in this context. Our objective was to evaluate how the use of these estimands and choice of estimation method impacts results and interpretation of a large phase III TB trial. METHODS: We reanalyzed participant level data from the REMoxTB trial. We applied four estimands and various methods of estimation to assess non-inferiority of both novel 4-month treatment regimens against standard of care. RESULTS: With each of the four estimands we reached the same conclusion as the original trial analysis; that the novel regimens were not non-inferior to standard of care. Each estimand and method of estimation gave similar estimates of the treatment effect with fluctuations in variance and differences driven by the methods applied for handling intercurrent events. CONCLUSIONS: Our application of estimands defined by the ICH E9(R1) addendum offers a formalized framework for addressing the primary TB treatment trial objective and can promote uniformity in future trials by limiting heterogeneity in trial outcome definitions. We demonstrated the utility of our proposal using data from the REMoxTB randomized trial. We outlined methods for estimating each estimand and found consistent conclusions across estimands. We recommend future late-phase TB treatment trials to implement some or all of our estimands to promote rigorous outcome definitions and reduce variability between trials. Trial registration: NCT00864383
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10659528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106595282023-11-20 Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial Weir, Isabelle R Dufault, Suzanne M Phillips, Patrick PJ Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Randomized trials for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) rely on a composite primary outcome to capture unfavorable treatment responses. However, variability between trials in the outcome definition and estimation methods complicates across-trial comparisons and hinders the advancement of treatment guidelines. The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) provides international regulatory standards for clinical trials. The estimand framework outlined in the recent ICH E9(R1) addendum offers a timely opportunity for randomized trials of TB treatment to adopt broadly standardized outcome definitions and analytic approaches. We previously proposed and defined four estimands for use in this context. Our objective was to evaluate how the use of these estimands and choice of estimation method impacts results and interpretation of a large phase III TB trial. METHODS: We reanalyzed participant level data from the REMoxTB trial. We applied four estimands and various methods of estimation to assess non-inferiority of both novel 4-month treatment regimens against standard of care. RESULTS: With each of the four estimands we reached the same conclusion as the original trial analysis; that the novel regimens were not non-inferior to standard of care. Each estimand and method of estimation gave similar estimates of the treatment effect with fluctuations in variance and differences driven by the methods applied for handling intercurrent events. CONCLUSIONS: Our application of estimands defined by the ICH E9(R1) addendum offers a formalized framework for addressing the primary TB treatment trial objective and can promote uniformity in future trials by limiting heterogeneity in trial outcome definitions. We demonstrated the utility of our proposal using data from the REMoxTB randomized trial. We outlined methods for estimating each estimand and found consistent conclusions across estimands. We recommend future late-phase TB treatment trials to implement some or all of our estimands to promote rigorous outcome definitions and reduce variability between trials. Trial registration: NCT00864383 American Journal Experts 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10659528/ /pubmed/37986887 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3486707/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Weir, Isabelle R
Dufault, Suzanne M
Phillips, Patrick PJ
Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
title Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
title_full Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
title_fullStr Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
title_full_unstemmed Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
title_short Estimands for clinical endpoints in Tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
title_sort estimands for clinical endpoints in tuberculosis treatment randomized controlled trials: a retrospective application in a completed trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986887
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3486707/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT weirisabeller estimandsforclinicalendpointsintuberculosistreatmentrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaretrospectiveapplicationinacompletedtrial
AT dufaultsuzannem estimandsforclinicalendpointsintuberculosistreatmentrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaretrospectiveapplicationinacompletedtrial
AT phillipspatrickpj estimandsforclinicalendpointsintuberculosistreatmentrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaretrospectiveapplicationinacompletedtrial