Assessment of Decision-Making and Material Selection for Vital Pulp Therapy in Deep Carious Lesions: A Study at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to assess decision-making, material selection, and management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth requiring vital pulp therapy (VPT); investigate the intradepartmental and interdepartmental consensus in the management of those cases; and correlate this study's results to the current scientific literature, clinical experience, and postgraduate training among staff and postgraduate students at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University. Materials and methods: The survey included faculty from pedodontics, endodontics, and restorative/operative dentistry; postgraduate students; and interns, excluding specific categories such as retired faculty, external trainers, non-faculty hospital specialists, general practitioners, students, interns outside the institution, and other departments. An anonymous electronic questionnaire was developed and validated. Ethical approval was obtained, and the questionnaire was distributed to all 148 English-proficient members of the targeted population via email and WhatsApp, accompanied by a cover letter. The questionnaire encompassed demographic, education, experience, assessment, decision-making, and management sections. Data were collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel, with results presented using categorical variables, Pareto charts, and statistical tests. Results: There were 86 responses, representing 58% of the target population, with the key findings including the prominence of "Pre-operative vitality test result" as the most important factor in assessing deep carious lesions, with no significant differences among specialties. The (one-step and one-visit) management approach was preferred by 50% of participants, with no significant specialty differences. For deep carious lesions without pulpal exposure, glass ionomer (GI)/resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) base was the top choice, with no variation among all specialties. In cases with pulpal exposure, the one-visit approach (direct pulp capping (DPC), base, and restoration) was the most favored, with no specialty differences. Material availability significantly influenced decision-making, with no specialty variations. Conclusion: The study highlights the crucial role of pre-operative vitality tests in assessing deep carious lesions for VPT or root canal treatment (RCT). Participants generally favored VPT for cases with normal pulp vitality, with some departmental variation. Controlling bleeding post-pulpal exposure was a central concern. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was the most commonly used VPT material, followed by Ca(OH)(2) and Biodentine. Factors such as treatment access, patient compliance, remaining dentin thickness, and oral hygiene had minimal impact on treatment choice. Limited availability of VPT materials was the primary reason for non-use. The survey's acceptable response rate raises concerns about potential non-response bias, though limitations include a lack of data on non-responders. Nevertheless, the survey's strength lies in its comprehensive coverage of key clinical aspects, engaging professionals from diverse specialties and educational levels who are collectively interested in addressing deep caries cases.