Cargando…

“Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning

INTRODUCTION: While feedback aims to support learning, students frequently struggle to use it. In studying feedback responses there is a gap in explaining them in relation to learning theory. This study explores how feedback experiences influence medical students’ self-regulation of learning. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spooner, Muirne, Larkin, James, Liew, Siaw Cheok, Jaafar, Mohamed Hasif, McConkey, Samuel, Pawlikowska, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04842-9
_version_ 1785148950884384768
author Spooner, Muirne
Larkin, James
Liew, Siaw Cheok
Jaafar, Mohamed Hasif
McConkey, Samuel
Pawlikowska, Teresa
author_facet Spooner, Muirne
Larkin, James
Liew, Siaw Cheok
Jaafar, Mohamed Hasif
McConkey, Samuel
Pawlikowska, Teresa
author_sort Spooner, Muirne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While feedback aims to support learning, students frequently struggle to use it. In studying feedback responses there is a gap in explaining them in relation to learning theory. This study explores how feedback experiences influence medical students’ self-regulation of learning. METHODS: Final-year medical students across three campuses (Ireland, Bahrain and Malaysia) were invited to share experiences of feedback in individual semi-structured interviews. The data were thematically analysed and explored through the lens of self-regulatory learning theory (SRL). RESULTS: Feedback interacts with learners’ knowledge and beliefs about themselves and about learning. They use feedback to change both their cognitive and behavioural learning strategies, but how they choose which feedback to implement is complex. They struggle to generate learning strategies and expect teachers to make sense of the “how” in addition to the “what”” in planning future learning. Even when not actioned, learners spend time with feedback and it influences future learning. CONCLUSION: By exploring our findings through the lens of self-regulation learning, we advance conceptual understanding of feedback responses. Learners’ ability to generate “next steps” may be overestimated. When feedback causes negative emotions, energy is diverted from learning to processing distress. Perceived non-implementation of feedback should not be confused with ignoring it; feedback that is not actioned often impacts learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04842-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106664392023-11-22 “Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning Spooner, Muirne Larkin, James Liew, Siaw Cheok Jaafar, Mohamed Hasif McConkey, Samuel Pawlikowska, Teresa BMC Med Educ Research INTRODUCTION: While feedback aims to support learning, students frequently struggle to use it. In studying feedback responses there is a gap in explaining them in relation to learning theory. This study explores how feedback experiences influence medical students’ self-regulation of learning. METHODS: Final-year medical students across three campuses (Ireland, Bahrain and Malaysia) were invited to share experiences of feedback in individual semi-structured interviews. The data were thematically analysed and explored through the lens of self-regulatory learning theory (SRL). RESULTS: Feedback interacts with learners’ knowledge and beliefs about themselves and about learning. They use feedback to change both their cognitive and behavioural learning strategies, but how they choose which feedback to implement is complex. They struggle to generate learning strategies and expect teachers to make sense of the “how” in addition to the “what”” in planning future learning. Even when not actioned, learners spend time with feedback and it influences future learning. CONCLUSION: By exploring our findings through the lens of self-regulation learning, we advance conceptual understanding of feedback responses. Learners’ ability to generate “next steps” may be overestimated. When feedback causes negative emotions, energy is diverted from learning to processing distress. Perceived non-implementation of feedback should not be confused with ignoring it; feedback that is not actioned often impacts learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04842-9. BioMed Central 2023-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10666439/ /pubmed/37993832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04842-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Spooner, Muirne
Larkin, James
Liew, Siaw Cheok
Jaafar, Mohamed Hasif
McConkey, Samuel
Pawlikowska, Teresa
“Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
title “Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
title_full “Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
title_fullStr “Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
title_full_unstemmed “Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
title_short “Tell me what is ‘better’!” How medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
title_sort “tell me what is ‘better’!” how medical students experience feedback, through the lens of self-regulatory learning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04842-9
work_keys_str_mv AT spoonermuirne tellmewhatisbetterhowmedicalstudentsexperiencefeedbackthroughthelensofselfregulatorylearning
AT larkinjames tellmewhatisbetterhowmedicalstudentsexperiencefeedbackthroughthelensofselfregulatorylearning
AT liewsiawcheok tellmewhatisbetterhowmedicalstudentsexperiencefeedbackthroughthelensofselfregulatorylearning
AT jaafarmohamedhasif tellmewhatisbetterhowmedicalstudentsexperiencefeedbackthroughthelensofselfregulatorylearning
AT mcconkeysamuel tellmewhatisbetterhowmedicalstudentsexperiencefeedbackthroughthelensofselfregulatorylearning
AT pawlikowskateresa tellmewhatisbetterhowmedicalstudentsexperiencefeedbackthroughthelensofselfregulatorylearning